1. Comparative Performance of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and Conventional Imaging in the Primary Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy.
- Author
-
Rovera G, Grimaldi S, Oderda M, Marra G, Calleris G, Iorio GC, Falco M, Grossi C, Passera R, Campidonico G, Mangia ML, Deandreis D, Faletti R, Ricardi U, Gontero P, and Morbelli S
- Abstract
This prospective study aimed to (1) compare the diagnostic performance of
68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with respect to conventional imaging (computed tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS)) in the primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients and (2) validate PSMA-PET/CT accuracy in pelvic nodal staging in comparison with postoperative histopathology and assess PSMA-PET/CT's impact on patient management. Sixty castration-sensitive high-risk (ISUP 4-5 and/or PSA > 20 ng/mL and/or cT3) PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy were enrolled (median PSA 10.10 [IQR: 6.22-17.95] ng/mL). PSMA-PET/CT, compared with CT, identified nodal (N) and/or distant metastases (M1) in 56.7% (34/60) vs. 13.3% (8/60) ( p < 0.001) of patients: N + 45% vs. 13.3% ( p < 0.001), M1a 11.7% vs. 1.7% ( p = 0.03), M1b 23.3% vs. 1.7% ( p < 0.001). Compared with BS, PSMA-PET/CT localized unknown skeletal metastases in 15% (9/60) of cases, with no false negative findings. Overall, PSMA-PET/CT led to a TNM upstaging in 45.0% (27/60) of cases, with no evidence of downstaging, resulting in a change in management in up to 28.8% (17/59) of patients. Compared with histopathology data ( n = 32 patients), the per-patient accuracy of PSMA-PET/TC for detecting pelvic nodal metastases was 90.6%. Overall, the above evidence supports the use of PSMA-PET/CT in the diagnostic workup of high-risk prostate cancer staging.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF