Search

This study aimed to analyze the treatment effects of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion using dental cone-beam computed tomography (CT) in adolescents. The study group comprised 20 patients who underwent cone-beam CT before and after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE). Paired t-test and analysis of variance were used to analyze significant differences before and after treatment. Skeletal and dentoalveolar measurements indicated highly significant differences, with these expansions increasing progressively in the downward direction. The extent of anterior midpalatal suture expansion was significantly greater than that of the posterior part. Significant expansion was observed at the nasal width and inter-zygomaticomaxillary suture distance. MARPE can expand the craniofacial skeletal structure to the uppermost nasal bone and lateral to the zygomaticomaxillary sutures. The expansion was greater in the lower maxillary part, demonstrating an overall triangular maxillary expansion. The midpalatal suture opening was greater in the anterior than in the posterior side, whereas the posterior suture opening proportion was higher than that of the conventional rapid palatal expansion previously reported.

Background: We conducted a narrative review of studies analyzing the occlusal and mandibular plane angles after maxillary molar distalization using temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TADs). An original preliminary investigation was conducted on the occlusal and mandibular plane angle changes according to the design of TAD-supported distalization. Methods: We included 51 participants stratified into three groups (buccal TAD, lingual arch TAD, and pendulum TAD) who underwent lateral cephalography before and after treatment. The paired t-test and ANOVA were used to analyze the significant differences among the groups. Results: The pterygoid vertical to maxillary second molar (p < 0.01) significantly differed before and after treatment within each group (group 1, 1.29 ± 1.73 mm; group 2, 2.01 ± 1.46 mm; group 3, 1.12 ± 1.43 mm). The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and anatomical occlusal plane increased by 1.96 ± 2.88° (p < 0.05) and 2.51 ± 2.57° (p < 0.01) in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: The measured variables did not significantly differ among the three groups. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle and functional occlusal plane did not change after maxillary molar distalization. The anatomical occlusal plane is influenced by the anterior teeth and may be unrelated to maxillary molar distalization. Further studies are required to verify the exact relationship between maxillary molar distalization and occlusal plane angle.