Search

Background: Postimplantation syndrome (PIS) is a known inflammatory response following endovascular stent placement, yet comparative data between venous and arterial stenting remains limited. This study seeks to evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and clinical implications of PIS across these two distinct vascular territories. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 191 patients who underwent either venous (n = 36) or arterial (n = 155) stent placement. Data collection encompassed demographic profiles, perioperative laboratory findings, and clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PIS, defined as the presence of fever (≥38 °C), leukocytosis, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) within 30 days postprocedure. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital and ICU stay, incidence of endoleaks, reintervention rates, and 30-day mortality. Comparative statistical analyses were conducted to assess differences between the venous and arterial stent groups. Results: PIS was observed more frequently in arterial stent patients, as evidenced by significantly elevated postoperative white blood cell counts at 24 and 48 h ( p = 0.046 and p = 0.014, respectively), along with borderline CRP increases ( p = 0.052). Fever occurrence peaked at 72 and 96 h postprocedure, predominantly in the arterial cohort. Furthermore, patients with arterial stents had significantly longer hospital stays (5.59 ± 0.46 days vs. 3.42 ± 0.36 days; p = 0.0018) and a higher rate of 30-day endoleaks (7.1% vs. 0%; p = 0.005). Despite similar mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates between groups, arterial stent patients exhibited a greater need for reintervention. While PIS was less common among venous stent recipients, its potential impact on postoperative recovery warrants careful monitoring. Conclusions: Arterial stenting is associated with a higher incidence of PIS and a more pronounced systemic inflammatory response, contributing to longer hospitalization and increased postoperative complications. Although venous stent patients experience PIS less frequently, its occurrence should not be overlooked, as it may influence overall recovery and clinical outcomes. Recognition and management of PIS in both venous and arterial stent patients are critical to improving patient care and optimizing procedural success.

Background: Aortic coarctation, a condition characterized by localized narrowing of the aorta, can be managed with either surgical or endovascular techniques. This study aims to compare these approaches concerning long-term outcomes, particularly re-coarctation rates and late arterial hypertension. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with native, isolated aortic coarctation treated by surgical or endovascular methods between 2015 and 2024. Clinical and demographic data were collected from electronic health records. Blood pressure was measured using oscillometric devices, and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed by an experienced sonographer. The primary endpoint was to identify which treatment predicted re-coarctation during follow-up, while the secondary endpoint assessed the incidence of late arterial hypertension. Results: Sixty-nine patients were included, with a mean age of 18.14 ± 8.18 years (median 16 years; range 8 to 37 years) and a median follow-up of 3 years (range 6 months to 8 years). Of these, 67 (97.1%) underwent elective repairs. Repair techniques included endovascular treatment (24.6%), surgical end-to-end anastomosis (47.8%), and surgical patchplasty (27.5%). The endovascular group was significantly older (29.82 ± 5.9 years vs. 14.33 ± 4.25 years, p = 0.056) and had shorter procedure durations and hospital stays. One-year freedom from reintervention was significantly higher in the surgical group (98.7%) compared to the endovascular group (88.23%) ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both techniques effectively treat aortic coarctation, but surgical repair offers better long-term outcomes, while endovascular repair provides shorter recovery times. These findings should inform the choice of treatment modality based on patient-specific factors and clinical priorities.

Background: This study assessed vascular complications in patients who received extracorporeal membrane support following cardiac surgery. Methods: We included 84 post-cardiotomy patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) from July 2018 to May 2022. Only patients connected to VA-ECMO (Veno-Arterial) via peripheral cannulation were included in this study. Vascular complications were compared between those who had ECMO placed using the percutaneous technique ( n = 52) and those who had it placed via femoral incision ( n = 32). Results: The incidence of vascular thromboembolism was significantly higher in the percutaneous technique group compared with the open technique group ( p < 0.05). Hematomas were also more frequent in the percutaneous technique group ( p = 0.04). Conversely, bleeding and leakage were significantly more frequent in the open technique group ( p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of wound infections or revisions in the inguinal area following ECMO removal. The mortality rate associated with vascular ischemia was 81.2%, while the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 60.7%. Conclusions: The open technique for ECMO placement may reduce the risk of thromboembolic events and hematomas compared to the percutaneous technique. However, it may be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding and leakage. Both techniques show similar outcomes in terms of overall mortality and wound infections.