Search

A black-spotted duodenal mucosa was observed during endoscopy of a man with several comorbidities including hypertension and end-stage kidney disease. Histopathological examination revealed pigment-laden macrophages in the lamina propria of the duodenal villi, which was consistent with duodenal pseudomelanosis.

High-risk Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent therapeutical challenges and are usually managed with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine. Given the lack of data in the literature concerning azacitidine effects on bone marrow, we retrospectively analyzed 57 high-risk MDS cases in order to identify any changes induced by azacitidine therapy or relevant correlations between therapy response and pre- or post-treatment features. Azacitidine treatment had no significant impact on bone marrow cellularity or morphological dysplastic features. On the contrary, although not statistically significant, we observed a slight decrease in CD34+ and CD117+ blasts and p53+ precursors after treatment. Moreover, pre-treatment IPSS-R cytogenetic score (p = 0.004), lymphocytic infiltrate (p = 0.017) and p53+ elements (p = 0.001) correlated with AML progression, pre-treatment lymphocytic infiltrate was also linked to better response to therapy (p = 0.004), suggesting an anti-tumoral role of bone marrow microenvironment. Post-treatment blast count impacted negatively on overall survival (p = 0.035) and risk of leukemic progression (p = 0.04), while both post-treatment lymphocytic infiltrate and p53+ elements showed significant correlation with treatment response (p = 0.004 and p = 0.003 respectively). Higher post-treatment p53+ elements correlated also with risk of leukemic progression (p = 0.013). Our results suggest the possible role of lymphocytic infiltrate and p53+ elements as predictive markers in MDS treated with azacitidine, disclosing new chapters in the understanding of MDS evolution and treatment.

Simple Summary Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the treatment of choice for BCR-ABL1-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Dasatinib is a second generation TKI frequently associated with pleural effusion in up to 33% of patients. Here, we describe two cases of HHV8-negative large B cell effusion-based lymphoma (EBL) confined to the pleura, incidentally, diagnosed in patients presenting with dasatinib-related pleural effusion. One patient is alive and is in remission at 17 months from diagnosis, while unfortunately the other patient died of progressive disease and novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related pneumonia 16 months from diagnosis. These cases of large B cell EBL in patients receiving dasatinib raise concern about a possible association and we strongly recommend cytological investigation in patients with persistent/relapsing pleural effusion under dasatinib to improve the knowledge about this entity. Abstract Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the treatment of choice for BCR-ABL1-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Although TKIs have substantially improved prognosis of CML patients, their use is not free of adverse effects. Dasatinib is a second generation TKI frequently associated with pleural effusion in up to 33% of patients. This results in symptoms as dyspnea, cough and chest pain that may require therapy discontinuation. In the present report, we describe two exceptional cases of HHV8-negative large B-cell effusion-based lymphoma (EBL) confined to the pleura, incidentally, diagnosed in patients presenting with dasatinib-related pleural effusion. One patient (case 1) is alive and is in remission at 17 months from large B-cell EBL diagnosis while unfortunately the other patient (case 2) died of progressive disease and COVID-19 pneumonia 16 months from large B-cell EBL diagnosis. These cases raise concern about a possible association between large B-cell EBL and dasatinib, and the different clinical outcome of the two cases poses a challenge in treatment decision. For this reason, we strongly recommend cytological investigation in patients with persistent/relapsing pleural effusion under dasatinib, primarily to validate its possible association with lymphoma development and to improve the knowledge about this entity.

Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for approximately 80–85% of all lung cancers and at present represents the main cause of cancer death among both men and women. To date, surgery represents the cornerstone; nevertheless, around 40% of completely resected patients develop disease recurrence. Therefore, combining neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy and surgery might lead to improved survival. Immunotherapy is normally well tolerated, although significant adverse reactions have been reported in certain patients treated with inhibitors of immune checkpoints. In this review, we explore the current literature on the use of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy followed by surgery for treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, with particular attention to the histological aspects, ongoing trials, and the most common surgical approaches. In conclusion, neoadjuvant immunotherapy whether combined or not with chemotherapy reveals a promising survival benefit for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer; nevertheless, more data remain necessary to identify the best candidates for neoadjuvant regimens.

Simple Summary Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematological disorders, characterized by increased proliferation of the myeloid lineages in the bone marrow. Since their original recognition by William Damashek in 1951, MPNs have been extensively investigated at a clinical-pathological and molecular level. This prompted a progressive refinement of their classification and diagnostic criteria. Uncertainties nonetheless remain in a small (yet consistent) subset of cases, characterized by unconventional and/or overlapping clinical-pathological features. Such cases (referred to as MPN, unclassifiable [MPN-U]) encompass a broad spectrum of entities, including early phase MPNs, terminal (i.e., fibrotic) MPNs, MPNs associated with inflammatory or neoplastic disorders, and poorly characterized MPNs with clinical-pathological mismatch or atypical molecular features. In this review, we discuss the rationale behind the classification and diagnostic criteria of MPNs, focusing on the still open issues concerning MPN-U. Abstract Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders, characterized by increased proliferation of one or more myeloid lineages in the bone marrow. The classification and diagnostic criteria of MPNs have undergone relevant changes over the years, reflecting the increased awareness on these conditions and a better understanding of their biological and clinical-pathological features. The current World Health Organization (WHO) Classification acknowledges four main sub-groups of MPNs: (i) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; (ii) classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Polycythemia Vera; Essential Thrombocythemia; Primary Myelofibrosis); (iii) non-classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia; Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia); and (iv) MPNs, unclassifiable (MPN-U). The latter are currently defined as MPNs with clinical-pathological findings not fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for any other entity. The MPN-U spectrum traditionally encompasses early phase MPNs, terminal (i.e., advanced fibrotic) MPNs, and cases associated with inflammatory or neoplastic disorders that obscure the clinical-histological picture. Several lines of evidence and clinical practice suggest the existence of additional myeloid neoplasms that may expand the spectrum of MPN-U. To gain insight into such disorders, this review addresses the history of MPN classification, the evolution of their diagnostic criteria and the complex clinical-pathological and biological features of MPN-U.

Immunotherapy has become the standard-of-care in many solid tumors. Despite the significant recent achievements in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer, several issues related to patients’ selection for immunotherapy remain unsolved. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that, in this setting, the vision of a single biomarker is somewhat naïve and imprecise, given that immunotherapy does not follow the rules that we have experienced in the past for targeted therapies. On the other hand, additional immune-related biomarkers that are reliable in real-life clinical practice remain to be identified. Recently, the immune-checkpoint blockade has been approved in the US irrespective of the tumor site of origin. Further histology-agnostic approvals, coupled with with tumor-specific companion diagnostics and guidelines, are expected in this field. In addition, immune-related biomarkers can also have a significant prognostic value. In this review, we provide an overview of the role of these biomarkers and their characterization in the management of lung cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial cancers, and breast cancer.