Search

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) holds a poor prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes, and the development of new effective treatment strategies is an unmet medical need. TNBC has traditionally been considered not amenable to treatment with targeted agents due to a lack of actionable targets. Therefore, chemotherapy has remained the mainstay of systemic treatment for many decades. The advent of immunotherapy raised very hopeful expectations in TNBC, possibly due to higher levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden compared to other breast cancer subtypes, that predict an effective anti-tumor immune-engagement. The results of clinical trials testing immunotherapy in TNBC led to the approval of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in both early and advanced settings. However, some open questions about the use of immunotherapy in TNBC still exist. These include a deeper understanding of the heterogeneity of the disease, identification of reliable predictive biomarkers of response, determination of the most appropriate chemotherapy backbone and appropriate management of potential long-term immune-related adverse events. In this review we aim to examine the available evidence on the use of immunotherapy strategies in both early and advanced TNBC, to critically discuss some of the limitations encountered in clinical research and to summarize data on novel promising immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD-(L)1 blockade that have been investigated in the most recent trials.

In clinical trials testing abemaciclib in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer, diarrhea is a very common adverse event (occurring in approximately 85% of patients, any grade). Nonetheless, this toxicity leads to abemaciclib discontinuation in a small proportion of patients (approximately 2%) thanks to the use of effective loperamide-based supportive therapy. We aimed to determine whether the incidence of abemaciclib-induced diarrhea in real-world trials was higher than the one reported in clinical trials, where patients are highly selected, and to evaluate the success rate of standard supportive care in this setting. We conducted a retrospective, observational, monocentric study including 39 consecutive patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with abemaciclib and endocrine therapy at our institution from July 2019 to May 2021. Overall, diarrhea of any grade occurred in 36 patients (92%), of whom 6 (17%) had diarrhea of grade ≥3. In 30 patients (77%), diarrhea was associated with other adverse events, including fatigue (33%), neutropenia (33%), emesis (28%), abdominal pain (20%), and hepatotoxicity (13%). Loperamide-based supportive therapy was administered to 26 patients (72%). Abemaciclib dose was reduced in 12 patients (31%) due to diarrhea, and treatment was permanently discontinued in 4 patients (10%). In 58% of patients (15/26), diarrhea was effectively managed with supportive care and did not require abemaciclib dose reduction and/or discontinuation. In our real-world analysis, we observed a higher incidence of diarrhea related to abemaciclib compared to data from clinical trials, and a higher rate of permanent treatment discontinuation due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Better implementation of guideline-based supportive care could help to manage this toxicity.