Search

Objectives: Activated platelets might play an important role in tumor progression. Mean platelet volume (MPV) has been used as a surrogate marker for platelet activation, and therefore its value as a marker of tumor prognosis has attracted recent attention. In this study, we aimed to critically evaluate the prognostic significance of the perioperative platelet count (COP), MPV and the MPV/COP ratio in head and neck cancer patients. Additionally, we explored the individual postoperative trajectory of these indices and their association with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 122 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving surgery with curative intent followed by postoperative radiotherapy. Platelet indices were measured preoperatively and on days 1 and 7 postoperatively. OS and DFS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimators, the log-rank test and uni and multivariable Cox models. Cutoffs to dichotomize patients for Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were empirically chosen at the respective median. The median follow-up was 8.8 years., Results: The adjusted preoperative COP, MPV and MPV/COP ratio were not associated with disease outcome. A low postoperative COP and a high MPV/COP ratio on the first postoperative day were independently associated with worse OS and DFS. In comparison to the preoperative measurements, patients whose COP increased by day 1 post-op showed a better OS (hazard ratio (HR) per 50 G/L increase: 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.93, p = 0.013) and DFS (HR per 50 G/L increase: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94, p = 0.018) in multivariable analysis., Conclusions: Our results suggest that a low postoperative COP and a high MPV/COP ratio represent a negative prognostic factor for OS and DFS. Notably, patients with an increase in COP by day 1 post-op when compared to their preoperative value showed a significantly better OS and DFS., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Bone-conduction implants are a standard therapeutic option for patients with conductive, unilateral, or mixed hearing loss who either do not tolerate conventional hearing aids or can benefit from surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term medical and technical outcomes, and audiological results with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. This retrospective study included all patients implanted with a bone-conduction hearing implant at a tertiary medical referral center between March 2012 and October 2018. Medical and technical outcomes included the mean length of implant usage, medical and technical complications (skin and wound infection, lack of benefit, technical failure), explantations and revisions, coupling approaches, implant failure rate, implant survival and the implant loss for added follow-up years. Auditory results were measured by functional hearing gain and the Freiburger monosyllabic test at 65 dB sound pressure level. Sixty-four patients were included in the study; five of these were implanted bilaterally (69 devices). Five unilaterally implanted patients were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up was 27.1 months (range: 0.2 months-6.3 years). The mean implant usage was 25.9 months (range: 0.2 months-6.3 years). Fifty-seven implants (89.1%) were in use at the end of the follow-up period. Complications occurred in six ears (9.4%). Five implants (7.8%) were explanted without reimplantation. Device failure occurred in one implant (1.6%), which was possibly caused by recurrent head trauma. The rate of implant loss due to technical device failure (damage to device) was 1 per 72 follow-up years. The mean improvement on the Freiburger monosyllabic test (52.1%, p = 0.0001), and in functional hearing gain across frequencies (26.5 dB, p = 0.0001) was significant. This single-center follow-up reveals the medical and technical reliability of a transcutaneous bone-conduction implant for hearing rehabilitation because complication and revision rates were low. The majority of patients still used the device at the end of the observation period. Implantation resulted in favorable hearing outcomes in comparison to that of unaided conditions. Cautious patient selection mainly regarding co-morbidities, the history of chronic otologic diseases and proper surgical technique seems to be crucial in reducing complications., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.