Search

Background/Objectives : Carotid artery stenosis (CAS) is one of the main causes of stroke, and the vulnerability of plaque has been proved to be a determinant. A joint analysis of shear wave elastography, a radiofrequency echo-based wall tracking technique for arterial stiffness evaluation, and of autonomic and baroreflex function is proposed to noninvasively, preoperatively assess plaque vulnerability in asymptomatic CAS patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Methods : Elastographic markers of arterial stiffness were derived preoperatively in 78 CAS patients (age: 74.2 + 7.7 years, 27 females). Autonomic and baroreflex markers were also assessed by means of an analysis of the beat-to-beat fluctuations in heart period and systolic arterial pressure, derived at rest in supine position (REST) and during active standing. Postoperative analysis identified 36 patients with vulnerable plaque (VULN) and 42 with stable plaque (STABLE). Results : Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) at a respiratory rate decreased during STAND only in VULN patients, being much higher at REST compared to STABLE levels. Autonomic indexes were not helpful in separating experimental conditions and/or populations. The Young's modulus (YM) of the plaque was lower in the VULN group than in the STABLE one. Cardiovascular control and elastographic markers were significantly correlated only in VULN patients. A multivariate logistic regression model built combining YM and BRS at the respiratory rate improved the prediction of plaque vulnerability, reporting an area under the ROC curve of 0.694. Conclusions : Noninvasive techniques assessing shear wave elastography and baroreflex control could contribute to the early detection of plaque vulnerability in patients with asymptomatic CAS.

Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is a common valvular heart disease affecting millions of people worldwide. It leads to significant neurocognitive and neuropsychological impairments, impacting patients' quality of life., Objective: The objective of this article is to identify and discuss the potential neurocognitive effects on patients with aortic stenosis before and after undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)., Method: Our study involved the assessment of 64 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using a neurocognitive evaluation comprising a battery of 11 different cognitive tests. These tests were designed to analyze the patients' overall cognitive functioning, executive abilities, short- and long-term memory, and attentional performance. The tests were administered to patients before the aortic valve surgery (T0) and after the surgery (T1). From a statistical perspective, numerical variables are presented as means (±standard deviation) and medians (IQR), while categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. T0 and T1 scores were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4., Results: Conducted as part of a fully financed Italian Ministry of Health project (RF-2016-02361069), the study found that most patients showed normal cognitive functioning at baseline. Cognitive assessments showed that executive functions, attention, language, and semantic knowledge were within the normal range for the majority of participants. After SAVR, cognitive outcomes remained stable or improved, particularly in executive functions and language. Notably, verbal episodic memory demonstrated significant improvement, with the percentage of patients scoring within the normal range on the BSRT increasing from 73.4% at T0 to 92.2% at T1 ( p < 0.0001). However, visuospatial and visuoconstructive abilities showed stability or slight decline, while attentional skills remained relatively stable. The Clock Drawing Test indicated the maintenance of cognitive functions., Conclusions: The findings of our study indicate a global stability in cognitive status among patients after undergoing SAVR, with significant improvement noted in verbal episodic memory. While other cognitive domains did not demonstrate statistically significant changes, these insights are valuable for understanding the cognitive effects of SAVR and can guide future research and clinical practice in selecting the most effective surgical and rehabilitative options for patients. Monitoring cognitive outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery remains crucial.

Background : Autonomic function and baroreflex control might influence the survival rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) compared to respiratory failure patients without COVID-19 (non-COVID-19). This study describes physiological control mechanisms in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU in comparison to non-COVID-19 individuals with the aim of improving stratification of mortality risk. Methods : We evaluated autonomic and baroreflex control markers extracted from heart period (HP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) variability acquired at rest in the supine position (REST) and during a modified head-up tilt (MHUT) in 17 COVID-19 patients (age: 63 ± 10 years, 14 men) and 33 non-COVID-19 patients (age: 60 ± 12 years, 23 men) during their ICU stays. Patients were categorized as survivors (SURVs) or non-survivors (non-SURVs). Results : We found that COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 populations exhibited similar vagal and sympathetic control markers; however, non-COVID-19 individuals featured a smaller baroreflex sensitivity and an unexpected reduction in the HP-SAP association during the MHUT compared to the COVID-19 group. Nevertheless, none of the markers of the autonomic and baroreflex functions could distinguish SURVs from non-SURVs in either population. Conclusions : We concluded that COVID-19 patients exhibited a more preserved baroreflex control compared to non-COVID-19 individuals, even though this information is ineffective in stratifying mortality risk.

Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) has been associated with tuberculosis (TB), but the true incidence is unknown. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the PTE prevalence in TB patients hospitalized at the National Institute for Infectious Diseases L. Spallanzani during the January 2016-December 2021 period. Retrospective data collection and evaluation were conducted. Among 1801 TB patients, 29 (1.61%) exhibited PTE. Twenty (69%) had comorbidities; eleven (37.9%) had predisposing factors for PTE. Nineteen (65.5%) had extensive TB disease. The commonest respiratory symptoms were cough (37.9%), dyspnea (31%), chest pain (10.3%), and hemoptysis (6.9%). Twenty-five (86.2%) had elevated serum D-dimer levels. An increased prevalence of PTE from 0.6% in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period to 4.6% in the pandemic period was found. Acute respiratory failure and extensive TB disease increased significantly in the pandemic period. The increase in PTE could be explained by the increased severity of TB in patients in the pandemic period and by increased clinical suspicion and, consequently, increased requests for D-dimer testing, including in patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients with extensive pulmonary disease are at high risk of developing PTE. Clinicians should be aware of this potentially life-threatening complication of TB, and patients should receive a thromboembolism risk assessment.

Background: The WHO advised that the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on TB services was estimated to be dramatic due to the disruption of TB services., Methods: A retrospective data collection and evaluation was conducted to include all the patients hospitalized for TB at INMI from 9 March to 31 August 2020 (lockdown period and three months thereafter). For the purpose of the study, data from patients hospitalized in the same period of 2019 were also collected., Results: In the period of March-August 2019, 201 patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of TB, while in the same period of 2020, only 115 patients, with a case reduction of 43%. Patients with weight loss, acute respiratory failure, concurrent extrapulmonary TB, and higher Timika radiographic scores were significantly more frequently hospitalized during 2020 vs. 2019. The median patient delay was 75 days (IQR: 40-100) in 2020 compared to 30 days (IQR: 10-60) in 2019 ( p < 0.01). Diagnostic delays in 2020 remain significant in the multiple logistic model (AOR = 6.93, 95%CI: 3.9-12.3)., Conclusions: Our experience suggests that COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on TB patient care in terms of higher diagnostic delay, reduction in hospitalization, and a greater severity of clinical presentations., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest