Search

Introduction: The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG2018) is a scoring system used to recommend the clinical management of AC. However, such a scoring system must incorporate a variety of clinical outcomes of acute cholangitis (AC). In an emergency department (ED)-based setting, where efficiency and practicality are highly desired, clinicians may find the application of various parameters challenging. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and blood urea nitrogen-to-albumin ratio (BAR) are relatively common biomarkers used to assess disease severity. This study evaluated the potential value of TG2018 scores measured in an ED to predict a variety of clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the study also compared TG2018 scores with NLR and BAR scores to demonstrate their usefulness. Methods: This retrospective observational study was performed in an ED. In total, 502 patients with AC visited the ED between January 2016 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the TG2018 scoring system measured in the ED was a predictor of intensive care, long-term hospital stays (≥14 days), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) during admission care, and endotracheal intubation (ETI). Results: The analysis included 81 patients requiring intensive care, 111 requiring long-term hospital stays (≥14 days), 49 requiring PTBD during hospitalization, and 14 requiring ETI during hospitalization. For the TG2018 score, the adjusted OR (aOR) using (1) as a reference was 23.169 (95% CI: 9.788–54.844) for (3) compared to (1). The AUC of the TG2018 for the need for intensive care was 0.850 (95% CI: 0.815–0.881) with a cutoff of >2. The AUC for long-term hospital stays did not exceed 0.7 for any of the markers. the AUC for PTBD also did not exceed 0.7 for any of the markers. The AUC for ETI was the highest for BAR at 0.870 (95% CI: 0.837–0.899) with a cutoff value of >5.2. Conclusions: The TG2018 score measured in the ED helps predict various clinical outcomes of AC. Other novel markers such as BAR and NLR are also associated, but their explanatory power is weak. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is not well understood whether the severity of acute cholecystitis (AC) correlates with the extent of gallbladder (GB) inflammation or laboratory findings. This study aimed to assess whether the severity of AC, in accordance with the Tokyo Guidelines (TGs), is consistent with the extent of GB inflammation on histopathological and laboratory findings, including microbiological isolation in blood and bile. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent cholecystectomy for AC between January 2017 and May 2020 were reviewed. Demographic data, laboratory findings, the microbiologic culture of blood and bile, the extent of GB inflammation, and stone composition were compared in accordance with the TGs. Results: A total of 217 patients were divided into three groups of increasing severity—Grade I (n = 146), Grade II (n = 51), and Grade III (n = 20)—in accordance with the TGs. The Grade III group contained significantly older patients compared with the Grade I or Grade II groups (Grade I, 56.9 ± 13.9; Grade II, 64.3 ± 15.4; Grade III, 69.9 ± 9.9; p-value < 0.001). Patients in the Grade III group showed significantly higher levels of CRP, WBC, creatinine, and bilirubin and lower levels of platelets and albumin compared with the Grade I or Grade II group. As the grade of severity increased, the rate of microbiological isolation in blood (Grade I, 0% [0/146]; Grade II, 2.0% [1/51]; Grade III, 20% [4/20]; p-value < 0.001) and bile (Grade I, 19.9% [29/146]; Grade II, 33.3% [17/51]; Grade III, 70% [14/20]; p-value < 0.001) also increased significantly. However, there were no significant differences in the extent of GB inflammation between grades. Conclusions: AC severity, as stated by the TGs, does not correlate with the extent of GB inflammation on histopathological and laboratory findings. However, microbiological isolation in blood and bile was increased proportionally to the grade of the TGs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]