Search

Software reliability growth models (SRGMs) based on the non-homogeneous Poisson process have played a significant role in predicting the number of remaining errors in software, enhancing software reliability. Software errors are commonly attributed to the mental errors of software developers, which necessitate timely detection and resolution. However, it has been observed that the human error-making mechanism is influenced by factors such as learning and fatigue. In this paper, we address the issue of integrating the fatigue factor of software testers into the learning process during debugging, leading to the development of more realistic SRGMs. The first model represents the software tester's learning phenomenon using the tangent hyperbolic function, while the second model utilizes an exponential function. An exponential decay function models fatigue. We investigate the behavior of our proposed models by comparing them with similar SRGMs, including two corresponding models in which the fatigue factor is removed. Through analysis, we assess our models' quality of fit, predictive power, and accuracy. The experimental results demonstrate that the model of tangent hyperbolic learning with fatigue outperforms the existing ones regarding fit, predictive power, or accuracy. By incorporating the fatigue factor, the models provide a more comprehensive and realistic depiction of software reliability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the software development life cycle, the quality and reliability of software are critical to software developers. Poor quality and reliability not only cause the loss of customers and sales but also increase the operational risk due to unreliable codes. Therefore, software developers should try their best to reduce such potential software defects by undertaking a software testing project. However, to pursue perfect and faultless software is unrealistic since the budget, time, and testing resources are limited, and the software developers need to reach a compromise that balances software reliability and the testing cost. Using the model presented in this study, software developers can devise multiple alternatives for a software testing project, and each alternative has its distinct allocation of human resources. The best alternative can therefore be selected. Furthermore, the allocation incorporates debuggers' learning and negligent factors, both of which influence the efficiency of software testing in practice. Accordingly, the study considers both human factors and the nature of errors during the debugging process to develop a software reliability growth model to estimate the related costs and the reliability indicator. Additionally, the issue of error classification is also extended by considering the impacts of errors on the system, and the expected time required to remove simple or complex errors can be estimated based on different truncated exponential distributions. Finally, numerical examples are presented and sensitivity analyses are performed to provide managerial insights and useful directions to inform software release strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, an imperfect debugging software reliability growth model (SRGM) with Bayesian analysis was proposed to determine an optimal software release in order to minimize software testing costs and also enhance the practicability. Generally, it is not easy to estimate the model parameters by applying MLE (maximum likelihood estimation) or LSE (least squares estimation) with insufficient historical data. Therefore, in the situation of insufficient data, the proposed Bayesian method can adopt domain experts' prior judgments and utilize few software testing data to forecast the reliability and the cost to proceed with the prior analysis and the posterior analysis. Moreover, the debugging efficiency involves testing staff's learning and negligent factors, and therefore, the human factors and the nature of debugging process are taken into consideration in developing the fundamental model. Based on this, the estimation of the model's parameters would be more intuitive and can be easily evaluated by domain experts, which is the major advantage for extending the related applications in practice. Finally, numerical examples and sensitivity analyses are performed to provide managerial insights and useful directions for software release strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many NHPP software reliability growth models (SRGMs) have been proposed to assess software reliability during the past 40 years, but most of them have focused on modeling the fault detection process (FDP) in two ways: one is to ignore the fault correction process (FCP), i.e., faults are assumed to be instantaneously removed after the failure caused by the faults is detected. However, in real software development, it is not always reliable as fault removal usually needs time, i.e., the faults causing failures cannot always be removed at once and the detected failures will become more and more difficult to correct as testing progresses. Another way to model the fault correction process is to consider the time delay between the fault detection and fault correction. The time delay has been assumed to be constant and function dependent on time or random variables following some kind of distribution. In this paper, some useful approaches to the modeling of dual fault detection and correction processes are discussed. The dependencies between fault amounts of dual processes are considered instead of fault correction time-delay. A model aiming to integrate fault-detection processes and fault-correction processes, along with the incorporation of a fault introduction rate and testing coverage rate into the software reliability evaluation is proposed. The model parameters are estimated using the Least Squares Estimation (LSE) method. The descriptive and predictive performance of this proposed model and other existing NHPP SRGMs are investigated by using three real data-sets based on four criteria, respectively. The results show that the new model can be significantly effective in yielding better reliability estimation and prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]