Search

Simple Summary: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men worldwide, and its causes are influenced by both genetic and lifestyle factors. One lifestyle factor that has shown mixed evidence is alcohol consumption. While some studies suggest that heavy drinking increases prostate cancer risk, others show little to no connection. This research aims to clarify the relationship between alcohol consumption and prostate cancer by reviewing and analyzing global studies. By exploring how different types of alcohol and drinking patterns may influence cancer risk, the goal is to provide more precise guidance for healthcare providers and patients. These findings can help inform public health recommendations and future research on cancer prevention strategies, especially for higher-risk populations. Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a significant global health issue. The relationship between alcohol consumption and PCa risk has been the subject of extensive research, yet findings remain inconsistent. This review aims to clarify the association between alcohol intake and PCa risk, its aggressiveness, and the potential metabolic pathways involved in PCa onset. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed and MEDLINE, focusing on epidemiological studies, meta-analyses, cohort studies, and case–control studies. Studies evaluating alcohol consumption, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and PCa risk were included. The review also explored the roles of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) in alcohol metabolism. Results: The analysis reveals a complex relationship between alcohol consumption and PCa. Heavy alcohol intake is associated with an increased risk of PCa, particularly more aggressive forms, and higher mortality rates. However, studies also show weak or no association between moderate alcohol consumption and PCa. The variability in findings may be attributed to differences in alcohol types, regional factors, and study methodologies. Conclusions: The link between alcohol consumption and PCa risk is multifaceted. While heavy drinking appears to increase the risk of aggressive PCa, the overall relationship remains unclear. Further research is needed to better understand these associations and inform public health recommendations and cancer prevention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The review explores the critical role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging in diagnosing, staging, and treating prostate cancer. PSMA PET/CT offers superior diagnostic capabilities for identifying prostate cancer's spread, with potential as a prognostic indicator for the disease's recurrence and survival. It highlights PSMA's variability in expression, impacting personalised treatment plans, notably in radioligand therapy with [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617. This technology enhances treatment strategies, improves outcomes, and reduces unnecessary interventions, marking a significant advancement in personalised prostate cancer management. The review examines the vital role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). It focuses on the superior diagnostic abilities of PSMA PET/CT for identifying both nodal and distant PCa, and its potential as a prognostic indicator for biochemical recurrence and overall survival. Additionally, we focused on the variability of PSMA's expression and its impact on personalised treatment, particularly the use of [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. This review emphasises the essential role of PSMA PET/CT in enhancing treatment approaches, improving patient outcomes, and reducing unnecessary interventions, positioning it as a key element in personalised PCa management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Active surveillance is a strategy used to manage early-stage prostate cancer without immediate treatment, aiming to maintain patients' quality of life. However, concerns remain about identifying "aggressive prostate cancer" within the active surveillance cohort, which refers to cancers with a higher potential for progression. We defined aggressive prostate cancer within the active surveillance cohort as follows: a cancer that is not an indication for active surveillance, despite low-risk or favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, and will undergo pathological upgrading during the course of active surveillance monitoring. The identification of aggressive prostate cancer during active surveillance is crucial, as it indicates the need for a shift in the treatment strategy. The detection of aggressive prostate cancer in these cohorts enables a timely intervention and the initiation of appropriate definitive treatment options to improve patient outcomes. To tackle this, previous studies have suggested a personalized follow-up approach that uses a mix of clinical data, biomarkers, and genetic factors to assess risk. As active surveillance indications expand, the importance of identifying aggressive prostate cancer through a personalized risk-based follow-up is expected to increase. Active surveillance has emerged as a promising approach for managing low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC), with the aim of minimizing overtreatment and maintaining the quality of life. However, concerns remain about identifying "aggressive prostate cancer" within the active surveillance cohort, which refers to cancers with a higher potential for progression. Previous studies are predictors of aggressive PC during active surveillance. To address this, a personalized risk-based follow-up approach that integrates clinical data, biomarkers, and genetic factors using risk calculators was proposed. This approach enables an efficient risk assessment and the early detection of disease progression, minimizes unnecessary interventions, and improves patient management and outcomes. As active surveillance indications expand, the importance of identifying aggressive PC through a personalized risk-based follow-up is expected to increase. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Mutation in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) has been reportedly related to risks of prostate cancer (PCa). However, prior genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were limited to inconsistency, small-scale, one-outcome phenotype, or single ancestry. In this study, we used two large-scale population datasets from European and Chinese ancestries to comprehensively estimate the association of TERT loci polymorphisms with prostate tumorigenesis and severity. Results of this study showed that (1) over half of the risk variants were located at the intron 2 region in both populations; (2) seven novel loci situated at intron 2, intron 6, intron 9, and intron 12 were first identified to be related to PCa risk; (3) SNPs rs2736100 and rs2853677 were significantly associated with aggressive PCa, whereas rs35812074 was marginally related to PCa death; (4) most identified loci were different between Europeans and Chinese. These findings support the evidence regarding TERT polymorphisms in relation to PCa risk and prognosis, and indicate the heterogeneous genetic architectures of PCa susceptibility loci among distinct ancestries. Background: Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) has been consistently associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk. However, few studies have explored the association between TERT variants and PCa aggressiveness. Methods: Individual and genetic data were obtained from UK Biobank and a Chinese PCa cohort (Chinese Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics). Results: A total of 209,694 Europeans (14,550 PCa cases/195,144 controls) and 8873 Chinese (4438 cases/4435 controls) were involved. Nineteen susceptibility loci with five novel ones (rs144704378, rs35311994, rs34194491, rs144020096, and rs7710703) were detected in Europeans, whereas seven loci with two novel ones (rs7710703 and rs11291391) were discovered in the Chinese cohort. The index SNP for the two ancestries was rs2242652 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.12–1.20, p = 4.12 × 10−16) and rs11291391 (OR = 1.73, 95%CI:1.34–2.25, p = 3.04 × 10−5), respectively. SNPs rs2736100 (OR = 1.49, 95%CI:1.31–1.71, p = 2.91 × 10−9) and rs2853677 (OR = 1.74, 95%CI:1.52–1.98, p = 3.52 × 10−16) were found significantly associated with aggressive PCa, while rs35812074 was marginally related to PCa death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61, 95%CI:1.04–2.49, p = 0.034). Gene-based analysis showed a significant association of TERT with PCa (European: p = 3.66 × 10−15, Chinese: p = 0.043) and PCa severity (p = 0.006) but not with PCa death (p = 0.171). Conclusion: TERT polymorphisms were associated with prostate tumorigenesis and severity, and the genetic architectures of PCa susceptibility loci were heterogeneous among distinct ancestries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in CHEK2 have been associated with increased prostate cancer (PrCa) risk. Our objective was to analyze their occurrence in Croatian PrCa men and to evaluate the clinical characteristics of P/LP variant carriers. Therefore, we analyzed CHEK2 in 150 PrCa patients unselected for age of onset, family history of PrCa or clinical outcome, and the frequency of identified variants was compared to findings in 442 cancer-free men, of Croatian ancestry. We identified four PrCa cases harboring a P/LP variant in CHEK2 (4/150, 2.67%), which reached a statistical significance (p = 0.004) as compared to the control group. Patients with P/LP variants in CHEK2 developed PrCa almost 9 years earlier than individuals with CHEK2 wild-type alleles (8.9 years; p = 0.0198) and had an increased risk for lymph node involvement (p = 0.0047). No association was found between CHEK2 status and further clinical characteristics, including the Gleason score, occurrence of aggressive PrCa, the tumor or metastasis stage. However, carriers of the most common P/LP CHEK2 variant, the c.1100delC, p.Thr367Metfs15*, had a significantly higher Gleason score (p = 0.034), risk for lymph node involvement (p = 0.0001), and risk for developing aggressive PrCa (p = 0.027). Thus, in a Croatian population, CHEK2 P/LP variant carriers were associated with increased risk for early onset prostate cancer, and carriers of the c.1100delC, p.Thr367Metfs15* had increased risk for aggressive PrCa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

African American men have higher incidence rates of aggressive prostate cancer, where high levels of calcium and serum vitamin D deficient levels play a role in the racial differences in incidence. In this study, we examined associations of serum vitamin D with aggressive prostate cancer to improve our understanding of higher susceptibility of aggressive disease in this racial cohort. From Howard University Hospital, 155 African American men with clinically-identified prostate cancer were identified; 46 aggressive cases, and 58 non-aggressive cases. Serum vitamin D was assessed from fasting blood samples, and total calcium intake was assessed using the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms from three different loci were genotyped; rs731236, rs1544410, and rs11568820. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing aggressive to non-aggressive prostate cancer. Vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) significantly increased risk of aggressive disease (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.03-9.57, p-value = 0.04). Stratification by total calcium showed high calcium levels (≥800 mg/day) modified this association (OR: 7.3, 95% CI: 2.15-47.68, p-interaction = 0.03). Genetic variant rs11568820 appeared to increase the magnitude of association between deficient serum vitamin D and aggressive prostate cancer (OR: 3.64,95% CI: 1.12-11.75, p-value = 0.05). These findings suggest that high incidence of aggressive prostate cancer risk in African American men may be due in-part to deficient levels of serum vitamin D. Other factors, including genetics, should be considered for future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Identifying which men at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis have, or will progress to, an aggressive fatal disease will allow clinicians to assist men in making better informed treatment decisions. This will not only be important for those men whose disease is likely to remain indolent and who are currently undergoing unnecessary treatment procedures, but also for those who may need to be targeted with immediate and potentially life-saving therapy. Our case-control study confirms that men who carry BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM germline pathogenic variants are at increased risk of aggressive disease and provides risk estimates that will be used by clinicians to improve counselling. While gene panel sequencing is becoming widely used for cancer risk prediction, its clinical utility with respect to predicting aggressive prostate cancer (PrCa) is limited by our current understanding of the genetic risk factors associated with predisposition to this potentially lethal disease phenotype. This study included 837 men diagnosed with aggressive PrCa and 7261 controls (unaffected men and men who did not meet criteria for aggressive PrCa). Rare germline pathogenic variants (including likely pathogenic variants) were identified by targeted sequencing of 26 known or putative cancer predisposition genes. We found that 85 (10%) men with aggressive PrCa and 265 (4%) controls carried a pathogenic variant (p < 0.0001). Aggressive PrCa odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. Increased risk of aggressive PrCa (OR (95% confidence interval)) was identified for pathogenic variants in BRCA2 (5.8 (2.7–12.4)), BRCA1 (5.5 (1.8–16.6)), and ATM (3.8 (1.6–9.1)). Our study provides further evidence that rare germline pathogenic variants in these genes are associated with increased risk of this aggressive, clinically relevant subset of PrCa. These rare genetic variants could be incorporated into risk prediction models to improve their precision to identify men at highest risk of aggressive prostate cancer and be used to identify men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who require urgent treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The potential importance of germline genetic variation for identifying men at increased risk of prostate cancer has become increasingly recognised in recent years. We present an extensive review of the major developments in the identification of genetic loci, genes and individual variants associated with greater risk of prostate cancer, and what is currently known regarding whether these heritable prostate cancer risk factors can also inform likelihood of experiencing clinically significant rather than indolent forms of the disease. We finally discuss how these research discoveries might serve to inform clinical germline genetic testing guidelines and treatment options for prostate cancer in the future. Prostate cancer (PrCa) is a heterogeneous disease, which presents in individual patients across a diverse phenotypic spectrum ranging from indolent to fatal forms. No robust biomarkers are currently available to enable routine screening for PrCa or to distinguish clinically significant forms, therefore late stage identification of advanced disease and overdiagnosis plus overtreatment of insignificant disease both remain areas of concern in healthcare provision. PrCa has a substantial heritable component, and technological advances since the completion of the Human Genome Project have facilitated improved identification of inherited genetic factors influencing susceptibility to development of the disease within families and populations. These genetic markers hold promise to enable improved understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning PrCa development, facilitate genetically informed PrCa screening programmes and guide appropriate treatment provision. However, insight remains largely lacking regarding many aspects of their manifestation; especially in relation to genes associated with aggressive phenotypes, risk factors in non-European populations and appropriate approaches to enable accurate stratification of higher and lower risk individuals. This review discusses the methodology used in the elucidation of genetic loci, genes and individual causal variants responsible for modulating PrCa susceptibility; the current state of understanding of the allelic spectrum contributing to PrCa risk; and prospective future translational applications of these discoveries in the developing eras of genomics and personalised medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In 2020, approximately 191,930 new prostate cancer (PCa) cases are estimated in the United States (US). Hispanic/Latinos (H/L) are the second largest racial/ethnic group in the US. This study aims to assess methylation patterns between aggressive and indolent PCa including DNA repair genes along with ancestry proportions. Prostate tumors classified as aggressive (n = 11) and indolent (n = 13) on the basis of the Gleason score were collected. Tumor and adjacent normal tissue were annotated on H&E (Haemotoxylin and Eosin) slides and extracted by macro-dissection. Methylation patterns were assessed using the Illumina 850K DNA methylation platform. Raw data were processed using the Bioconductor package. Global ancestry proportions were estimated using ADMIXTURE (k = 3). One hundred eight genes including AOX1 were differentially methylated in tumor samples. Regarding the PCa aggressiveness, six hypermethylated genes (RREB1, FAM71F2, JMJD1C, COL5A3, RAE1, and GABRQ) and 11 hypomethylated genes (COL9A2, FAM179A, SLC17A2, PDE10A, PLEKHS1, TNNI2, OR51A4, RNF169, SPNS2, ADAMTSL5, and CYP4F12) were identified. Two significant differentially methylated DNA repair genes, JMJD1C and RNF169, were found. Ancestry proportion results for African, European, and Indigenous American were 24.1%, 64.2%, and 11.7%, respectively. The identification of DNA methylation patterns related to PCa in H/L men along with specific patterns related to aggressiveness and DNA repair constitutes a pivotal effort for the understanding of PCa in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]