1. The Different Effects of Noradrenaline on Rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma Cancer Hallmarks—Implications for Exercise Oncology.
- Author
-
Weeber, Peter, Bremer, Stephanie, Haferanke, Jonas, Regina, Carla, Schönfelder, Martin, Wackerhage, Henning, and von Luettichau, Irene
- Subjects
ADRENERGIC receptors ,EWING'S sarcoma ,CANCER cell culture ,CELL migration ,NORADRENALINE - Abstract
Simple Summary: High-impact publications have reported both the beneficial and harmful effects of catecholamines on cancer hallmarks and outcomes—a contradiction that is underappreciated and poorly explained. Here, we aimed to investigate whether differences in adrenergic receptor isoform expression can explain different cancer hallmark responses to catecholamines, since cancer cells can vary greatly in the expressions of nine adrenergic receptors. For this purpose, we cultured two cancer cell lines that systematically differ in their adrenergic receptor expressions: A673 cells, which express α1D-, α2C-, β1-, and β3-adrenergic receptors, and RD sarcoma cells, which barely express any adrenergic receptors. The cells were treated with noradrenaline to elucidate the effects of noradrenaline exposure on cell proliferation, migration, and cAMP signaling. While the A673 cells responded to noradrenaline treatment with decreased cell numbers, cell proliferation and migration, and increased cAMP signaling, the RD cells did not respond to noradrenaline. Therefore, our findings indicate that the adrenergic receptor isoform expressions might indeed explain why cancers can respond differently to increases in catecholamine concentrations due to, e.g., a bout of exercise, psychosocial stress, surgery, or drugs such as β-blockers. Background: Exercise has beneficial effects on cancer and its treatment, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Some studies have linked the positive impact of exercise to catecholamine signaling. In contrast, cancer stress studies have typically reported that catecholamines worsen cancer hallmarks and outcomes. Here, we aimed to investigate whether adrenergic receptor isoform expression can explain the contradictory effects of catecholamines in cancer. Methods: We cultured two pediatric sarcoma cancer cell lines that either express (A673 cell line) or do not express (RD cell line) adrenergic receptors. The cells were treated with a 5× dilution series of noradrenaline to assess the effects of noradrenaline on cell numbers. After these dose-finding experiments, we treated both cancer cell lines with 60 μM noradrenaline to examine its effect on cell proliferation and migration and cAMP signaling. Results: Treatment with 60 μM noradrenaline significantly decreased the cell numbers by 61.89% ± 10.36 (p ≤ 0.001), decreased cell proliferation by 15.88% ± 6.76 (p ≤ 0.05), decreased cell migration after 24 h (p ≤ 0.001), and increased cAMP concentrations 38-fold (p ≤ 0.001) in the A673 cells, which express adrenergic receptors, but not in the RD cells, which do not express adrenergic receptors. Conclusions: Our results indicate, as a proof of principle, that the effects of catecholamines on cancer progression and metastasis might depend on the expressions of the nine adrenergic receptor isoforms. As cancers express adrenergic and other receptors differentially, this has implications for the response of cancers to exercise, stress, and medication and may help to further personalize cancer treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF