Search

Simple Summary: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with a higher risk of lung cancer. The impact of underlying ILD on cancer's clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcome is unclear, particularly in Caucasian populations. In this article, we reviewed the files of all patients diagnosed with lung cancer in a 38-month period and compared the patients with and without underlying interstitial changes for population and lung cancer characteristics, treatment and clinical outcome. Seven percent of patients with lung cancer had associated ILD at diagnosis. They were significantly older, but no other significant difference in population or cancer characteristics was observed. Patients with combined lung cancer and ILD had a worse clinical outcome even when similar treatment modalities were offered. Therefore, the choice of aggressive treatment strategies needs to be made carefully, with an awareness of the risk of acute exacerbation of ILD. Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is associated with a higher lung cancer (LC) risk and may impact cancer's clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes. This impact's extent is unclear, particularly in Caucasians. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the files of all LC patients diagnosed in a 38-month period. Expert radiologists reviewed the computed tomography scans performed at diagnosis. Patients with LC and ILD (n = 29, 7%) were compared to those without ILD (n = 363, 93%) for population and cancer characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes. Results: Patients with LC and ILD were older (73 ± 8 vs. 65 ± 11 years; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in LC histology, localization, stage, or treatment modalities. The respiratory complication rate after cancer treatment was significantly higher in the ILD group (39% vs. 6%; p < 0.01). Overall survival rates were similar at 12 (52% vs. 59%; p = 0.48) and 24 months (41% vs. 45%; p = 0.64) but poorer in the ILD group at 36 months, although not statistically significant (9% vs. 39%; p = 0.06). The ILD group had a higher probability of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.49 [0.96;2.27]), but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.06). In a Cox regression model, patients with ILD treated surgically had a significantly higher mortality risk (HR = 2.37 [1.1;5.09]; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients with combined LC and ILD have worse clinical outcomes even when similar treatment modalities are offered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biomarkers of systemic inflammation/nutritional status have been associated with outcomes in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, most of them were not tested in cohorts of patients treated with ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (CT) (ICI + CT) or with CT alone, making it impossible to discriminate a predictive from a prognostic effect. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to search for associations between various baseline biomarkers/scores that reflected the systemic inflammation/nutritional status (Lung Immune Prognostic Index, Modified Lung Immune Prognostic Index, Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score, Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index, EPSILoN, Prognostic Nutritional Index, Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index, Gustave Roussy Immune Score, Royal Marsden Hospital Prognostic Score, Lung Immuno-oncology Prognostic Score 3, Lung Immuno-oncology Prognostic Score 4, score published by Holtzman et al., and Glasgow Prognostic Score) and outcomes in metastatic NSCLC treated in a first-line setting either with ICI in monotherapy (cohort 1; n = 75), ICI + CT (cohort 2; n = 56), or CT alone (cohort 3; n = 221). In the three cohorts, the biomarkers/scores were moderately associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Their prognostic performance was relatively poor, with a maximum c-index of 0.66. None of them was specific to ICIs and could help to choose the best treatment modality. The systemic inflammation/nutritional status, associated with outcomes independently of the treatment, is therefore prognostic but not predictive in metastatic NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]