Search

Simple Summary: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most diagnosed malignancy of men worldwide, and radiotherapy (RT) is a main treatment option for patients in all disease stages. Modern diagnostic imaging and RT techniques enable an effective and safe delivery of high RT doses and a reduction of treatment time. We present a study protocol of a phase III trial implementing most modern imaging techniques and RT approaches. We compare the standard RT treatment with an RT concept of reduced treatment time and focal dose escalation based on the patient's individual tumor morphology. This HypoFocal-SBRT trial aims to individualize treatment of PCa patients. Technical advances in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and delivery have substantially changed RT concepts for primary prostate cancer (PCa) by (i) enabling a reduction of treatment time, and by (ii) enabling safe delivery of high RT doses. Several studies proposed a dose–response relationship for patients with primary PCa and especially in patients with high-risk features, as dose escalation leads to improved tumor control. In parallel to the improvements in RT techniques, diagnostic imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific-membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) evolved and enable an accurate depiction of the intraprostatic tumor mass for the first time. The HypoFocal-SBRT study combines ultra-hypofractionated RT/stereotactic body RT, with focal RT dose escalation on intraprostatic tumor sides by applying state of the art diagnostic imaging and most modern RT concepts. This novel strategy will be compared with moderate hypofractionated RT (MHRT), one option for the curative primary treatment of PCa, which has been proven by several prospective trials and is recommended and carried out worldwide. We suspect an increase in relapse-free survival (RFS), and we will assess quality of life in order to detect potential changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Radiation therapy can promote chemotaxis of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes by triggering the release of chemokines and altering the tumor's vascular endothelium, triggering both pro- and anti-inflammatory immune responses and altering the tumor microenvironment. These effects of local irradiation may have systemic consequences and can be enhanced through the combination of available immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). The study and validation of minimally invasive blood biomarkers for response and toxicity assessment are critical to stratify patients that would benefit from combination treatments. This exploratory prospective study evaluated the impact of thoracic radiotherapy approaches on the immune system using longitudinal assessment of a panel of blood biomarkers of angiogenesis and inflammation. We show that changes in circulating TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 levels could potentially indicate an early reduction in immunosuppression after radiotherapy. If validated in larger studies, these biomarker candidates might potentially help in optimally scheduling radiotherapy in combination with ICBs. The effects of radiotherapy on systemic immunity remain to be fully characterized in a disease-specific manner. The aim of the study was to examine potential biomarkers of systemic immunomodulation when using radiotherapy for thoracic malignancies. Serial blood samples were collected from 56 patients with thoracic malignancies prior (RTbaseline), during (RTduring) and at the end of radiotherapy (RTend), as well as at the first (FU1) and second follow-up (FU2). The changes in serum levels of IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, bFGF, sFlt-1, PlGF, VEGF, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and HGF were measured by multiplexed array and tested for associations with clinical outcomes. We observed an increase in the levels of IL-10, IFN-γ, PlGF and VEGF-D and a decrease in those of IL-8, VEGF, VEGF-C and sFlt-1 during and at the end of radiotherapy. Furthermore, baseline concentration of TNF-α significantly correlated with OS. IL-6 level at RTend and FU1,2 correlated with OS (RTend: p = 0.039, HR: 1.041, 95% CI: 1.002–1.082, FU1: p = 0.001, HR: 1.139, 95% CI: 1.056–1.228, FU2: p = 0.017, HR: 1.101 95% CI: 1.018–1.192), while IL-8 level correlated with OS at RTduring and RTend (RTduring: p = 0.017, HR: 1.014, 95% CI: 1.002–1.026, RTend: p = 0.004, HR: 1.007, 95% CI: 1.061–1.686). In conclusion, serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 are potential biomarkers of response to radiotherapy. Given the recent implementation of immunotherapy in lung and esophageal cancer, these putative blood biomarkers should be further validated and evaluated in the combination or sequential therapy setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: As the long-term effects of radiotherapy on the quality of life (QoL) of elderly (≥65 years) patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are not well understood, we examined the QoL of surviving elderly HNSCC patients who were treated with radiotherapy. In this cross-sectional study, long-term quality of life (QoL) at ≥1 year after radiotherapy completion was comparable to the general German population of the same age and gender. Patients whose HNSCC was induced by human papillomavirus (HPV) exhibited a superior long-term global QoL than elderly patients with HPV-negative tumors. Interestingly, concomitant chemotherapy administration did not deteriorate patients' global QoL in the long-term. We did not observe differences in patients' health-related QoL in dependence of the treatment (definitive versus adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy). Our data are important for clinicians treating elderly HNSCC patients as well as for elderly HNSCC patients themselves. The effects of radiotherapy on the long-term quality of life (QoL) of surviving elderly HNSCC patients are not well understood, therefore, we analyzed QoL in this population. A cross-sectional analysis was performed at a tertiary cancer center to assess long-term QoL in elderly HNSCC patients. Eligible patients were ≥65 years at the time of treatment who had to be alive for ≥1 year after radiotherapy and without current anti-cancer treatment. QoL and patient satisfaction were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35 and ZUF-8 questionnaires, respectively, and treatment-related toxicities were graded according to CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Effects) v.5.0. Seventy-four patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 50 consented to participate. Median time between radiotherapy and QoL assessment was 32 months (range 12–113). The QLQ-C30 global QoL median amounted to 66.7 points (interquartile range (IQR) 50.0–83.3), which was comparable to the age- and gender-adjusted German population (median 65.3). Median global QoL was similar between patients undergoing definitive (75.0, IQR 50.0–83.3) and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (66.7, IQR 41.7–83.3, p = 0.219). HPV-positive HNSCC patients had superior global QoL after radiotherapy than their HPV-negative counterparts (p < 0.05), and concomitant chemotherapy did not influence the long-term QoL (p = 0.966). Median global QoL did not correspond with physician-assessed highest-graded chronic toxicities (p = 0.640). The ZUF-8 ranged at 29 points in median (IQR 27–31), showing high patient satisfaction. Surviving elderly HNSCC patients treated by radiotherapy exhibit a relatively high long-term global QoL which is a relevant information for clinicians treating elderly HNSCC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]