1. 3D Printed Silicone Meniscus Implants: Influence of the 3D Printing Process on Properties of Silicone Implants
- Author
-
Juha Song, Swee Leong Sing, Ram Bajpai, Wai Yee Yeong, Eric Luis, Houwen Matthew Pan, Anil K. Bastola, School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine), and Singapore Centre for 3D Printing
- Subjects
Materials science ,Polymers and Plastics ,Scanning electron microscope ,Additive Manufacturing ,3D printing ,02 engineering and technology ,Meniscus (anatomy) ,010402 general chemistry ,Meniscus Implants ,01 natural sciences ,Article ,lcsh:QD241-441 ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Differential scanning calorimetry ,Silicone ,Engineering ,lcsh:Organic chemistry ,X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy ,RC925 ,medicine ,Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy ,validation ,business.industry ,technology, industry, and agriculture ,R735 ,General Chemistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,0104 chemical sciences ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,meniscus implants ,chemistry ,silicone ,Implant ,0210 nano-technology ,business ,RA ,additive manufacturing ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
Osteoarthritis of the knee with meniscal pathologies is a severe meniscal pathology suffered by the aging population worldwide. However, conventional meniscal substitutes are not 3D-printable and lack the customizability of 3D printed implants and are not mechanically robust enough for human implantation. Similarly, 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds suffer from drawbacks of being mechanically weak and as a result patients are unable to execute immediate post-surgical weight-bearing ambulation and rehabilitation. To solve this problem, we have developed a 3D silicone meniscus implant which is (1) cytocompatible, (2) resistant to cyclic loading and mechanically similar to native meniscus, and (3) directly 3D printable. The main focus of this study is to determine whether the purity, composition, structure, dimensions and mechanical properties of silicone implants are affected by the use of a custom-made in-house 3D-printer. We have used the phosphate buffer saline (PBS) absorption test, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, surface profilometry, thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to effectively assess and compare material properties between molded and 3D printed silicone samples. National Research Foundation (NRF) Published version This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Medium-Sized Center Funding scheme and the NTU Start-Up Grant.
- Published
- 2020