Search

Objectives: Although peroral cholangioscopy has improved the endoscopic treatment of difficult stones, the treatment of intrahepatic stones remains challenging. The incidence of cholangitis is high when peroral cholangioscopy is used to treat intrahepatic stones. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment with peroral cholangioscopy for intrahepatic and common bile duct stones. Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years, who underwent endoscopic treatment with peroral cholangioscopy for intrahepatic or common bile duct stones at Tottori University Hospital from January 2016 to December 2022, were retrospectively evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of the treatment. Results: Overall, 70 patients were included in this study: 22 in the intrahepatic stone group and 48 in the common bile duct stone group. Stones were smaller (8 vs. 17.5 mm, p < 0.001) and more numerous (p = 0.016) in the intrahepatic stone group than in the common bile duct stone group. Although the common bile duct stone group exhibited a higher rate of complete stone clearance in the first session, no significant differences were observed in the final results. The intrahepatic stone group had a higher incidence of cholangitis (36% vs. 8%, p = 0.007); however, all cases were mild. Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment with peroral cholangioscopy for intrahepatic stones may be associated with a higher incidence of cholangitis than that for common bile duct stones. Since saline irrigation may contribute to the development of cholangitis, it is important to be aware of intraductal bile duct pressure when performing peroral cholangioscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: There is controversy regarding stent placement for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO). We mainly use the partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) method with an uncovered self-expandable metallic stent (UCSEMS) based on the drainage area and patency period. In this study, we investigated the usefulness and safety of the PSIS method. (2) Methods: In total, 59 patients who underwent the PSIS method for UMHBO at our hospital were included in the study. The technical success rate, clinical success rate, time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) and overall survival (OS) from the first placement, factors affecting TRBO and OS, and early complications within 30 days after the procedure were evaluated retrospectively. (3) Results: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 96.6%, respectively, with a TRBO of 121 days [95% confidence interval: 82–231] and an OS of 194 days [95% confidence interval: 113–305] after the first placement. Early complications occurred in nine patients (15.3%), including five cases of cholangitis, three cases of pancreatitis, and one case of cholecystitis. (4) Conclusions: The PSIS method for UMHBO is safe and useful with high technical and clinical success rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pathological examination by endoscopic ultrasound–fine needle aspiration is not possible in approximately 10% of pancreatic tumor cases. Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is considered an alternative diagnostic method. However, its diagnostic capability is insufficient, and PJC has been repeatedly redevised. Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytological examination (SPACE) and secretin-loaded PJC (S-PJC) have been recently introduced as alternative diagnostic methods. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic capacity and safety of SPACE and S-PJC using a propensity score-matched analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 75.0%, 100%, and 92.3% for S-PJC, respectively, and 71.4%, 100%, and 92.3% for SPACE, respectively, meaning that there was no significant difference between the groups. Four patients (15.4%) each in the S-PJC and SPACE groups experienced complications, including postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. Overall, there was no difference in efficacy and safety between the SPACE and S-PJC groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an essential endoscopic tissue sampling method for diagnosing pancreatobiliary diseases; however, determining the presence of target specimens mixed in the blood by conventional observation is challenging due to the small size of the obtained sample. This study investigated the usefulness of a target sample check illuminator (TSCI) that emits a specific wavelength of light to determine the presence of target specimens. Twenty-seven patients who underwent EUS-FNA at our hospital were included. Conventional white light observation was performed for the collected samples, followed by TSCI; six people evaluated the presence of the target specimen on a 5-point scale. The target specimen discrimination score using TSCI (median: 5) was significantly higher than that using conventional white light observation (median: 1) (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discrimination score between the evaluator (novice vs. expert, p = 0.162) and puncture needle (22G vs. 25G, p = 0.196). The discriminability of TSCI in the samples obtained using EUS-FNA was significantly higher than that of conventional observation. TSCI does not depend on the evaluator or puncture needle for the identification of the target specimen; hence, it can provide a good pathological specimen and may contribute to the improvement of the diagnostic ability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) is believed to be effective in treating intrahepatic stones; however, reports on its efficacy are few. We reviewed the results of intrahepatic stones treated with fluoroscopic guidance or POCS. This study included 26 patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for intrahepatic stones at our institution between January 2017 and December 2021. We retrospectively evaluated the procedure time and adverse events in the first session and the rate of complete stone removal. Complete stone removal was achieved in 92% (24/26); POCS was required in 16 of 26 (62%) procedures and the complete stone removal was achieved in 15 of 16 (94%) of these procedures. The POCS group had a significantly longer procedure time than the fluoroscopy group. Cholangitis incidence was high; however, no difference was noted between patients with and without POCS, and all cases were mild and treated conservatively. Endoscopic treatment for intrahepatic stones may lead to an increase in the incidence of cholangitis, requires specialized devices such as a cholangioscope, and should be performed in an established institution by experienced staff. POCS is useful for intrahepatic stones formed upstream of the stenosis and intrahepatic stones piled in the bile duct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The risk of malignant transformation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is presently assessed using imaging, which remains unsatisfactory. Given the high viscosity of pancreatic juice, pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) is considered an investigational procedure. We previously demonstrated that the diagnostic performance of PJC was improved via synthetic secretin loading in pancreatic ductal carcinoma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of synthetic secretin-loaded PJC (S-PJC) for IPMN. The usefulness and safety of S-PJC were prospectively evaluated in 133 patients with IPMN. Overall, 92, 12, and 26 patients had branch duct, main duct, and mixed-type lesions, respectively. The risk classifications based on the 2017 international consensus guidelines were high-risk stigmata, worrisome features, and no risk in 29, 59, and 45 patients, respectively. Synthetic secretin loading improved the sensitivity of PJC from 50.0% to 70.8%. Complications included 13 (9.8%) cases of mild pancreatitis, 1 (0.8%) case of acute cholangitis, and 1 (0.8%) case of Mallory–Weiss syndrome, all of which resolved with conservative treatment. In conclusion, synthetic secretin-loaded PJC improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for malignant IPMN. We recommend using synthetic secretin-loaded PJC for the preoperative pathological diagnosis of malignant IPMN in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]