Search

Simple Summary: Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is the source of significant graft inflammation in liver transplantation. Such injuries can lead to increased recurrence of both benign and malignant diseases of the biliary tree after transplant. Herein, we review the mechanisms and risk factors for the link between IRI and biliary recurrence, as well as evidence for strategies to mitigate this damage. Liver transplantation is known to generate significant inflammation in the entire organ based on the metabolic profile and the tissue's ability to recover from the ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). This cascade contributes to post-transplant complications, affecting both the synthetic liver function (immediate) and the scar development in the biliary tree. The new occurrence of biliary strictures, and the recurrence of malignant and benign liver diseases, such as cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), are direct consequences linked to this inflammation. The accumulation of toxic metabolites, such as succinate, causes undirected electron flows, triggering the releases of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from a severely dysfunctional mitochondrial complex 1. This initiates the inflammatory IRI cascade, with subsequent ischemic biliary stricturing, and the upregulation of pro-tumorigenic signaling. Such inflammation is both local and systemic, promoting an immunocompromised status that can lead to the recurrence of underlying liver disease, both malignant and benign in nature. The traditional treatment for CCA was resection, when possible, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Liver transplant oncology is increasingly recognized as a potentially curative approach for patients with intrahepatic (iCCA) and perihilar (pCCA) cholangiocarcinoma. The link between IRI and disease recurrence is increasingly recognized in transplant oncology for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, smaller numbers have prevented similar analyses for CCA. The mechanistic link may be even more critical in this disease, as IRI causes the most profound damage to the intrahepatic bile ducts. This article reviews the underlying mechanisms associated with biliary inflammation and biliary pathology after liver transplantation. One main focus is on the link between transplant-related IRI-associated inflammation and the recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma and benign liver diseases of the biliary tree. Risk factors and protective strategies are highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: This review article serves to update physicians on what biomarker tests are available for the surveillance and follow up of hepatocellular carcinoma. Our goal is to provide an update on newly arising tests and their diagnostic accuracy when compared to the standard protocol. Findings from this article hope to promote further investigation into high utility tests and continue the pursuit of clinical utility for emerging biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death and the sixth most diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the traditional, ubiquitous biomarker for HCC. However, there has been an increasing call for the use of multiple biomarkers to optimize care for these patients. AFP, AFP-L3, and prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence II (DCP) have described clinical utility for HCC, but unfortunately, they also have well established and significant limitations. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), genomic glycosylation, and even totally non-invasive salivary metabolomics and/or micro-RNAS demonstrate great promise for early detection and long-term surveillance, but still require large-scale prospective validation to definitively validate their clinical validity. This review aims to provide an update on clinically available and emerging biomarkers for HCC, focusing on their respective clinical strengths and weaknesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a diagnostic and surveillance tool in cancer and recurrence. The recurrence rates after liver transplant for cancer are significant, highlighting the need for early detection and treatment. We report a cohort of patients who underwent liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, or colorectal cancer liver metastasis and received ctDNA testing pre- and/or post-transplant. We aim to show how ctDNA testing can be incorporated into pre-transplant work-up and post-transplant surveillance and discuss the benefits of this testing modality in the identification of genetic targets and surveillance of recurrence. Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a promising, non-invasive diagnostic and surveillance biomarker in solid organ malignancy. However, its utility before and after liver transplant (LT) for patients with primary and secondary liver cancers is still underexplored. Methods: Patients undergoing LT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with ctDNA testing were included. CtDNA testing was conducted pre-transplant, post-transplant, or both (sequential) from 11/2019 to 09/2023 using Guardant360, Guardant Reveal, and Guardant360 CDx. Results: 21 patients with HCC (n = 9, 43%), CRLM (n = 8, 38%), CCA (n = 3, 14%), and mixed HCC/CCA (n = 1, 5%) were included in the study. The median follow-up time was 15 months (range: 1–124). The median time from pre-operative testing to surgery was 3 months (IQR: 1–4; range: 0–5), and from surgery to post-operative testing, it was 9 months (IQR: 2–22; range: 0.4–112). A total of 13 (62%) patients had pre-transplant testing, with 8 (62%) having ctDNA detected (ctDNA+) and 5 (32%) not having ctDNA detected (ctDNA-). A total of 18 (86%) patients had post-transplant testing, 11 (61%) of whom were ctDNA+ and 7 (33%) of whom were ctDNA-. The absolute recurrence rates were 50% (n = 5) in those who were ctDNA+ vs. 25% (n = 1) in those who were ctDNA- in the post-transplant setting, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.367). Six (29%) patients (HCC = 3, CCA = 1, CRLM = 2) experienced recurrence with a median recurrence-free survival of 14 (IQR: 6–40) months. Four of these patients had positive post-transplant ctDNA collected following diagnosis of recurrence, while one patient had positive post-transplant ctDNA collected preceding recurrence. A total of 10 (48%) patients had sequential ctDNA testing, of whom n = 5 (50%) achieved ctDNA clearance (+/−). The remainder were ctDNA+/+ (n = 3, 30%), ctDNA−/− (n = 1, 10%), and ctDNA−/+ (n = 1, 11%). Three (30%) patients showed the acquisition of new genomic alterations following transplant, all without recurrence. Overall, the median tumor mutation burden (TMB) decreased from 1.23 mut/Mb pre-transplant to 0.00 mut/Mb post-transplant. Conclusions: Patients with ctDNA positivity experienced recurrence at a higher rate than the ctDNA- patients, indicating the potential role of ctDNA in predicting recurrence after curative-intent transplant. Based on sequential testing, LT has the potential to clear ctDNA, demonstrating the capability of LT in the treatment of systemic disease. Transplant providers should be aware of the potential of donor-derived cell-free DNA and improved approaches are necessary to address such concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]