Search

Amplification of the mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene is a mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs) in over 20% of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated (EGFRm+) non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it may also occur de novo in 2–8% of EGFRm+ NSCLC cases as a potential mechanism of intrinsic resistance. These patients represent a group with unmet needs, since there is no standard therapy currently approved. Several new MET inhibitors are being investigated in clinical trials, but the results are awaited. Meanwhile, as an alternative strategy, combinations of EGFR-TKIs with the MET/ALK/ROS1-TKI Crizotinib may be used in this setting, despite this use is principally off-label. Thus, we studied five of these MET amplified cases receiving EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib doublet after progression on EGFR-TKI treatment to assess the benefits and challenges related to this combination and the possible occurrence of genomic and phenotypic co-alterations. Furthermore, we compared our cases with other real-world reports on Crizotinib/EGFR-TKI combinations, which appeared effective, especially in patients with high-level MET amplification. Yet, we observed that the co-occurrence of other genomic and phenotypical alterations may affect the response to combined EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib. Finally, given the heterogeneity of MET amplification, the diagnostic methods for assessing it may be discrepant. In this respect, we observed that for optimal detection, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing should be used together, as these methods possess different sensitivities and complement each other in characterizing MET amplification. Additionally, we addressed the issue of managing EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with de novo MET amplification causing primary EGFR-TKI resistance. We conclude that, while data from clinical trials with new MET inhibitors are still pending, adding Crizotinib to EGFR-TKI in NSCLC patients acquiring MET amplification at progression on EGFR-TKI monotherapy is a reasonable approach, with a progression-free survival of 3–19 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnosis of anomalous intrathoracic lesions may be challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach. We present a case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) clinically and radiologically mimicking metastatic lung cancer with a bilateral pulmonary mass, mediastinal and cervical lymph node involvement, and pleural effusion. Surgical biopsy of the thoracic lesion revealed necrotic granulomatous inflammation, and the final diagnosis was subsequently confirmed by kidney biopsy and biochemical parameters. This case illustrates how comprehensive diagnosis secures timely and relevant treatment. Systemic vasculitis may be one of the key differential diagnoses in patients with multiorgan involvement, especially with pattern-mimicking lung cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: With the increasing number of therapy options available for patients with lung cancer, early response evaluation is needed. We performed this pilot study to assess the feasibility of early, repeated Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET/MR), the impact of timing and the capability for response prediction in lung tumors during chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer referred for chemotherapy were prospectively recruited. Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG)-PET/MR scans were performed prior to, during and after the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. Primary tumors were defined on all scans and size, FDG-uptake and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured. Early response was described over time and a Standard Linear Mixed Model was applied to analyze changes over time. Results: 45 FDG-PET/MR scans were performed in 11 patients. Whereas the overall changes measured by ADC did not change significantly, there was an overall significant decrease in FDG-uptake from pre to post treatment scans. There was no difference in the FDG-uptake measured 1 or 3 weeks after therapy, but uptake measured 2 weeks after therapy differed from measurements at week 3. Changes measured in patients scanned during the first treatment cycle appeared more pronounced than during the second cycle. Conclusions: This pilot study indicates that response evaluation shortly after initiation of chemotherapy appears concordant with later evaluation and probably more reliable than evaluation midway between cycles. Responses during or after the first cycle of chemotherapy rather than during subsequent cycles are likely to be more readily measured. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]