Search

Simple Summary: Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care for venous thromboembolism (VTE) but new guidelines approved using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). By conducting an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of NOAC versus LMWH in cancer patients, we aim to determine an ideal strategy for the prophylaxis of VTE and prevention of VTE recurrence. Our study further addresses the conflicting evidence in the literature with an individual patient data meta-analysis. However, other studies are required to balance the risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding among different cancer subgroups. Emerging data highlight the need for individualised antithrombotic strategies to achieve optimal management of cancer patients. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been the standard of care but new guidelines have approved the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). By conducting an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of NOAC versus LMWH in cancer patients, we aim to determine an ideal strategy for the prophylaxis of VTE and prevention of VTE recurrence. Three databases were searched from inception until 19 October 2022. IPD was reconstructed from Kaplan–Meier curves. Shared frailty, stratified Cox and Royston–Parmar models were fit to compare the outcomes of venous thromboembolism recurrence and major bleeding. For studies without Kaplan–Meier curves, aggregate data meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models. Eleven RCTs involving 4844 patients were included. Aggregate data meta-analysis showed that administering NOACs led to a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE (RR = 0.65; 95%CI: 0.50–0.84) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.40–0.90). In the IPD meta-analysis, NOAC when compared with LMWH has an HR of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.49–0.86) for VTE recurrence. Stratified Cox and Royston–Parmar models demonstrated similar results. In reducing risks of recurrent VTE and DVT among cancer patients, NOACs are superior to LMWHs without increased major bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with previous cancer are more likely to suffer from a heart attack than those without cancer. Although risk stratification scores are commonly used both to guide management and estimate mortality after a heart attack, it is unclear if such scores can be applied to patients with previous cancer. As such, this study aimed to determine the performance of the well-established GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score by combining large national cancer and heart attack databases. This study showed that although the GRACE score was more accurate in patients without cancer, it greatly underestimated the risk of death in patients with previous cancer. Specific risk stratification scores are required for patients with previous cancer who have a heart attack. Background Patients with prior cancer are at increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with poorer post-ACS outcomes. We aimed to ascertain if the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score accurately predicts mortality risk among patients with ACS and prior cancer. Methods We linked nationwide ACS and cancer registries from 2007 to 2018 in Singapore. A total of 24,529 eligible patients had in-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality risk calculated using the GRACE score (2471 prior cancer; 22,058 no cancer). Results Patients with prior cancer had two-fold higher all-cause mortality compared to patients without cancer (in-hospital: 22.8% versus 10.3%, p < 0.001; 1-year: 49.0% vs. 18.7%, p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality did not differ between groups (in-hospital: 5.2% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.346; 1-year: 6.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.12). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the GRACE score for prediction of all-cause mortality was less for prior cancer (in-hospital: 0.64 vs. 0.80, p < 0.001; 1-year: 0.66 vs. 0.83, p < 0.001). Among patients with prior cancer and a high-risk GRACE score > 140, in-hospital revascularization was not associated with lower cardiovascular mortality than without in-hospital revascularization (6.7% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.50). Conclusions The GRACE score performs poorly in risk stratification of patients with prior cancer and ACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Anthracyclines form the backbone of many systemic chemotherapy regimens with great response rates for cancers. Yet, their established dose-limiting cardiotoxic effects can also lead to a reduction in cardiac function and an increased risk of heart failure. This PRISMA-adherent systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials aims to evaluate the progression of cardiac dysfunction and levels of natriuretic peptides, and risk of heart failure in cancer patients receiving anthracyclines. Our review included cohorts which followed patients over two years from the administration of anthracyclines and demonstrated that there were no significant declines compared to after six months. This period would be the most crucial for concurrent cardioprotection to prevent adverse remodelling. We also found the risk of developing significant declines in LVEF occurred in approximately one in six. The confounding effect of receiving concomitant trastuzumab and baseline LVEF was also negligible. Background: Anthracyclines form the backbone of many systemic chemotherapy regimens but are accompanied by dose-limiting cardiotoxicity. We elucidate the progression and severity of cardiac function over time, in the absence of cardioprotection, which less is known about. Methods: This PRISMA-guideline-adherent review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022373496). Results: 26 studies met the eligibility criteria including a total of 910 patients. The overall reduction in post-anthracycline pooled mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in placebo arms of the included randomised-controlled trials was 4.5% (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.4). The trend in LVEF showed a progressive decline until approximately 180 days, after which there was no significant change. Those receiving a cumulative anthracycline dose of 300 mg/m2 experienced a more profound reduction. The overall pooled risk of a 10% absolute decline in LVEF from baseline, or a decline to an LVEF below 50%, was 17% (95% CI: 11 to 24; I2 = 71%). Sensitivity analyses of baseline LVEF and trastuzumab treatment status did not yield significant differences. Conclusion: While the mean LVEF decline in patients without cardioprotective therapy was clinically small, a vulnerable subset experienced significant impairment. Further research to best identify those who benefit most from cardioprotective therapies when receiving anthracyclines is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear if the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score at incident AMI is reflective of this higher risk in patients with prior cancer than those without. Methods: We linked nationwide AMI and cancer registries from 2008 to 2019. A total of 18,200 eligible patients with ASCVD risk score calculated at incident AMI were identified (1086 prior cancer; 17,114 no cancer). Results: At incident AMI, age-standardized mean ASCVD risk was lower in the prior cancer group (18.6%) than no cancer group (20.9%) (p < 0.001). Prior to incident AMI, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus were better controlled in the prior cancer group. However post-AMI, prior cancer was associated with lower guideline-directed medical therapy usage and higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.66–2.07). Conclusions: AMI occurred despite better control of cardiovascular risk factors and lower age-standardized estimated mean 10-year ASCVD risk among patients with prior cancer than no cancer. Prior cancer was associated with lower guideline-directed medical therapy post-AMI and higher mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]