Search

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is increasingly used for detailed vegetation structure mapping; however, there are many local-scale applications where it is economically ineffective or unfeasible from the temporal perspective. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or airborne imagery (AImg) appear to be promising alternatives, but only a few studies have examined this assumption outside economically exploited areas (forests, orchards, etc.). The main aim of this study was to compare the usability of normalized digital surface models (nDSMs) photogrammetrically derived from UAV-borne and airborne imagery to those derived from low- (1–2 pts/m2) and high-density (ca. 20 pts/m2) ALS-scanning for the precise local-scale modelling of woody vegetation structures (the number and height of trees/shrubs) across six dynamically changing shrubland sites. The success of the detection of woody plant tops was initially almost 100% for UAV-based models; however, deeper analysis revealed that this was due to the fact that omission and commission errors were approximately equal and the real accuracy was approx. 70% for UAV-based models compared to 95.8% for the high-density ALS model. The percentage mean absolute errors (%MAE) of shrub/tree heights derived from UAV data ranged between 12.2 and 23.7%, and AImg height accuracy was relatively lower (%MAE: 21.4–47.4). Combining UAV-borne or AImg-based digital surface models (DSM) with ALS-based digital terrain models (DTMs) significantly improved the nDSM height accuracy (%MAE: 9.4–13.5 and 12.2–25.0, respectively) but failed to significantly improve the detection of the number of individual shrubs/trees. The height accuracy and detection success using low- or high-density ALS did not differ. Therefore, we conclude that UAV-borne imagery has the potential to replace custom ALS in specific local-scale applications, especially at dynamically changing sites where repeated ALS is costly, and the combination of such data with (albeit outdated and sparse) ALS-based digital terrain models can further improve the success of the use of such data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the ever-improving advances in computer vision and Earth observation capabilities, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) allow extensive forest inventory and the description of stand structure indirectly. We performed several flights with different UAVs and popular sensors over two sites with coniferous forests of various ages and flight levels using the custom settings preset by solution suppliers. The data were processed using image-matching techniques, yielding digital surface models, which were further analyzed using the lidR package in R. Consumer-grade RGB cameras were consistently more successful in the identification of individual trees at all of the flight levels (84–77% for Phantom 4), compared to the success of multispectral cameras, which decreased with higher flight levels and smaller crowns (77–54% for RedEdge-M). Regarding the accuracy of the measured crown diameters, RGB cameras yielded satisfactory results (Mean Absolute Error—MAE of 0.79–0.99 m and 0.88–1.16 m for Phantom 4 and Zenmuse X5S, respectively); multispectral cameras overestimated the height, especially in the full-grown forests (MAE = 1.26–1.77 m). We conclude that widely used low-cost RGB cameras yield very satisfactory results for the description of the structural forest information at a 150 m flight altitude. When (multi)spectral information is needed, we recommend reducing the flight level to 100 m in order to acquire sufficient structural forest information. The study contributes to the current knowledge by directly comparing widely used consumer-grade UAV cameras and providing a clear elementary workflow for inexperienced users, thus helping entry-level users with the initial steps and supporting the usability of such data in practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]