Search

Simple Summary: Cancer and cancer treatment can induce menopause symptoms such as hot flushes, night sweats and poor sleep. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for these symptoms but may be contraindicated following certain cancer diagnoses. This study assesses if a composite intervention aimed to target these symptoms in women with a history of cancer and a contraindication to standard MHT could improve their quality of life over six months. We found a combination of non-hormonal medications to address daytime hot flushes and/or night sweats with digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, the provision of self-management strategies and identification of a partner or other support person resulting in clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in cancer-specific quality of life, insomnia symptoms, the frequency of hot flushes and night sweats and the degree of bother of these symptoms on day to day functioning. Background: Vasomotor symptoms (VMSs) associated with menopause represent a significant challenge for many patients after cancer treatment, particularly if conventional menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is contraindicated. Methods: The Menopause after Cancer (MAC) Study (NCT04766229) was a single-arm phase II trial examining the impact of a composite intervention consisting of (1) the use of non-hormonal pharmacotherapy to manage VMS, (2) digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (dCBT-I) using Sleepio (Big Health), (3) self-management strategies for VMS delivered via the myPatientSpace mobile application and (4) nomination of an additional support person/partner on quality of life (QoL) in women with moderate-to-severe VMS after cancer. The primary outcome was a change in cancer-specific global QoL assessed by the EORTC QLC C-30 v3 at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the frequency of VMS, the bother/interference of VMS and insomnia symptoms. Results: In total, 204 women (82% previous breast cancer) with a median age of 49 years (range 28–66) were recruited. A total of 120 women completed the protocol. Global QoL scores increased from 62.2 (95%CI 58.6–65.4) to 70.4 (95%CI 67.1–73.8) at 6 months (p < 0.001) in the intention to treatment (ITT) cohort (n = 204) and from 62 (95%CI 58.6–65.4) to 70.4 (95%CI 67.1–73.8) at 6 months (p < 0.001) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort (n = 120). At least 50% reductions were noticed in the frequency of VMS as well as the degree of bother/interference of VMS at six months. The prevalence of insomnia reduced from 93.1% at the baseline to 45.2% at 6 months (p < 0.001). The Sleep Condition Indicator increased from 8.5 (SEM 0.4) to 17.3 (SEM 0.5) (p < 0.0005) in the ITT cohort and 7.9 (SEM 0.4) to 17.3 (SEM 0.5) (p < 0.001) in the PP cohort. Conclusions: A targeted composite intervention improves the quality of life for cancer patients with frequent and bothersome vasomotor symptoms with additional benefits on frequency, the bother/interference of VMS and insomnia symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study, using real-world data, assesses the impact of RS testing on treatment pathways and the associated economic consequences of such testing. This paper pertains to lobular breast cancer. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was undertaken between 2011 and 2019 on a cross-section of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, lymph node-negative, early-stage breast cancer patients. All patients had ILC and had RS testing in Ireland. The patient population is representative of the national population. Patients were classified as low (RS ≤ 25) or high (RS > 25) risk. Patients aged ≤50 were stratified as low (RS 0–15), intermediate (RS 16–25), or high risk (RS > 25). Results: A total of 168 patients were included, most of whom had grade 2 (G2) tumors (n = 154, 92%). Overall, 155 patients (92.3%) had low RS (≤25), 12 (7.1%) had high RS (>25), and 1 (0.6%) had unknown RS status. In 29 (17.5%) patients aged ≤50 at diagnosis, RS was ≤15 in 16 (55%), 16–20 in 6 (21%), 21–25 in 5 (17%), >25 in 1 (3.5%), and unknown in 1 (3.5%). Post RS testing, 126 patients (78%) had a change in chemotherapy recommendation; all to hormone therapy. In total, only 35 patients (22%) received chemotherapy. RS testing achieved a 75% reduction in chemotherapy use, resulting in savings of €921,543.84 in treatment costs, and net savings of €387,283.84. Conclusions: The use of this test resulted in a 75% reduction in chemotherapy and a significant cost savings in our publicly funded health system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer who progress through available HER2-targeted therapy, at present, have few effective treatment options. PIK3CA is mutated in approximately 20% of HER2 positive breast cancers, contributes to HER-2 therapy resistance and may be predictive of response to PI3K inhibitors, including copanlisib. PIK3CA gene mutations were assessed in archival tumour tissue and serially in plasma circulating tumour DNA over the course of treatment with copanlisib. Disease stabilisation (stable disease ≥16 weeks) was seen with copanlisib and trastuzumab in a proportion of participants (n = 6, 50%). PIK3CA mutation detected in archival tumour tissue did not appear to predict tumour response to copanlisib and trastuzumab in this small, heavily pre-treated cohort. Notably, PIK3CA circulating tumour DNA mutations were detected in the plasma of all trial participants, including those who tested negative for the mutation in tissue. This study established a dosing strategy for the novel combination of the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib with trastuzumab and suggested clinical activity for the combination in heavily pre-treated HER-2 positive advanced breast cancer. Further evaluation in a phase 2 study in patients with HER2 therapy resistant tumours is ongoing (NCT02705859). Background: Activation of the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is a resistance mechanism to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. This phase Ib trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of copanlisib, an intravenous (IV) pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, combined with trastuzumab. Methods: Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and disease progression following at least one prior line of HER2 therapy in the metastatic setting were treated with copanlisib (45 or 60 mg) IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle with a fixed dose of trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly. Results: Twelve patients were enrolled. The MTD was determined as copanlisib 60 mg plus trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly. The most common adverse events of any grade occurring in more than two patients were hyperglycaemia (58%), fatigue (58%), nausea (58%) and hypertension (50%). Stable disease was confirmed at 16 weeks in six participants (50%). PIK3CA mutations were detected in archival tumour of six participants (50%). PIK3CA hotspot mutations, were detectable in pre- and on-treatment plasma of all participants. Pre- and post-treatment tumour biopsies for two patients identified temporal genomic heterogeneity, somatic mutations in the TRRAP gene, which encodes a PI3K-like protein kinase, and emergent somatic mutations related to protein kinase signalling. Conclusion: Copanlisib and trastuzumab can be safely administered with fair overall tolerability. Preliminary evidence of tumour stability was observed in patients with heavily pre-treated, metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer. Several potential biomarkers were identified for further study in the current phase 2 clinical trial. NCT: 02705859. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer clinical trials (CCTs) are critical to translation and development of better therapies to improve outcomes. CCTs require adequate patient involvement but accrual rates are low globally. Several known barriers impede participation and knowing how subpopulations differ in understanding of CCTs can foster targeted approaches to aid accrual and advance cancer treatments. We conducted the first nationwide survey of 1089 patients attending 14 Irish cancer centres, assessing understanding of fundamental concepts in CCT methodology and factors that influence participation, to help tailor patient support for accrual to CCTs. Two-thirds (66%) of patients reported never having been offered a CCT and only 5% of those not offered asked to participate. Misunderstanding of clinical equipoise was prevalent. There were differences in understanding of randomisation of treatment by age ( p < 0.0001), ethnicity ( p = 0.035) and marital status ( p = 0.013), and 58% of patients and 61% previous CCT participants thought that their doctor would ensure better treatment in CCTs. Females were slightly more risk averse. Males indicated a greater willingness to participate in novel drug trials ( p = 0.001, p = 0.003). The study identified disparities in several demographics; older, widowed, living in provincial small towns and fewer years-educated patients had generally poorer understanding of CCTs, highlighting requirements for targeted support in these groups.