Search

Testing of ChatGPT has recently been performed over a diverse range of topics. However, most of these assessments have been based on broad domains of knowledge. Here, we test ChatGPT's knowledge of tinnitus, an important but specialized aspect of audiology and otolaryngology. Testing involved evaluating ChatGPT's answers to a defined set of 10 questions on tinnitus. Furthermore, given the technology is advancing quickly, we re-evaluated the responses to the same 10 questions 3 and 6 months later. The accuracy of the responses was rated by 6 experts (the authors) using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. Most of ChatGPT's responses were rated as satisfactory or better. However, we did detect a few instances where the responses were not accurate and might be considered somewhat misleading. Over the first 3 months, the ratings generally improved, but there was no more significant improvement at 6 months. In our judgment, ChatGPT provided unexpectedly good responses, given that the questions were quite specific. Although no potentially harmful errors were identified, some mistakes could be seen as somewhat misleading. ChatGPT shows great potential if further developed by experts in specific areas, but for now, it is not yet ready for serious application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study looked at the possible effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals who came to our clinic seeking relief from tinnitus. The performance of the subjects during the COVID-19 pandemic was compared with similar individuals who came to our clinic before the pandemic began. The study involved 50 adults with chronic tinnitus, made up of a study group (24 subjects tested during the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020–2021) and a control group before the pandemic began (26 subjects tested from 2013 to 2017). None of the 24 reported having contracted COVID-19. Data collection involved the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) questionnaire, audiological tests, and quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG). In terms of THI scores, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. However, with regard to qEEG, some changes were observed, with significant decreases in alpha and beta band activity in the study group compared to the control group, particularly over the auditory cortex. We conclude that COVID-19 did not have a discernible impact on the general well-being of individuals with tinnitus. However, it did appear to alter brain activity, specifically in the alpha and beta bands over the auditory cortex, and these reults warrant further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hearing is normally evaluated up to 8 kHz, even though testing can easily be performed at higher frequencies (up to 16 or 20 kHz). The range beyond 8 kHz is often referred to as the extended high frequency (EHF) range. This study aimed to explore the relationship between EHF hearing thresholds (HTs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) in adult subjects. Also of interest were the effects of the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), gender, ear side, and age. The main finding was that DPOAEs, both within the standard frequency (SF) range (0.125–8 kHz) and the EHF range (10–16 kHz), decrease as thresholds deteriorate. For both ranges, DPOAEs and HTs depend on age, even for those with normal hearing, although EHFs seem to be especially affected by age. The presence of SOAEs was the only other factor that significantly influenced DPOAE level. For both DPOAEs and HTs, only minor and non-significant effects were related to gender and ear side. It was concluded that DPOAEs in the EHF range appear to be good predictors of EHF HTs. Moreover, since DPOAEs and HTs in the EHF range both correlate with age, these two measures may be suitable markers for incipient presbycusis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: This narrative review of the literature explores the effect of body temperature on hearing. In particular, its focus is on extended high frequency (EHF) hearing—the range beyond the standard audiometric limit of 8 kHz. Such high frequencies are the first to be affected by noise-induced hearing loss, and so monitoring them can provide an early warning sign of incipient damage. Materials and Methods: This review builds on a personal literature database of 216 references covering the general topic of EHF hearing; the procedure was to then identify papers related to whole-body or cochlear cooling. A starting point was the paper by Munjal et al. who in 2013 reported changes of up to 15–30 dB in the EHF thresholds of subjects who had undergone cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) surgery, which typically involves mild to moderate hypothermia—cooling of the blood—to reduce cellular oxygen demand and minimise tissue damage. Results: Reviewing the surrounding literature, we find that although CBP surgery by itself can impair hearing thresholds, lower body and cochlear temperatures in general provide neuroprotective effects. A connection between hearing loss and CBP surgery has been periodically documented, but the mechanism behind it has yet to be conclusively identified. Conclusions: The observations reviewed here tend to confirm the otoprotective effects of cooling. We consider that the high sensitivity of EHF thresholds to temperature is a major factor that has not been sufficiently recognised, although it has important implications for otological research and practice. Two important inferences are that, first, monitoring EHF thresholds might have considerable value in audiology, and, second, that lowering temperature of the cochlea during cochlear implantation might provide substantially better hearing preservation, as some researchers have already suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of the study was to measure the variability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) over a long period of time in one person. TEOAEs with and without contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) by white noise were measured, from which MOCR strength could be derived as either a dB or % change. In this longitudinal case study, measurements were performed on the right and left ears of a young, normally hearing adult female once a week for 1 year. The results showed that TEOAE level and MOCR strength fluctuated over the year but tended to remain close to a baseline level, with standard deviations of around 0.5 dB and 0.05 dB, respectively. The TEOAE latencies at frequencies from 1 to 4 kHz were relatively stable, with maximum changes ranging from 0.5 ms for the 1 kHz band to 0.08 ms for the 4 kHz band. TEOAE levels and MOCR strengths were strongly and negatively correlated, meaning that the higher the TEOAE level, the lower the MOCR. Additionally, comparison of fluctuations between the ears revealed positive correlation, i.e., the higher the TEOAE level or MOCR in one ear, the higher in the second ear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) between men and women. The strength of the MOCR was measured in terms of the suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS). The difference between TEOAEs with and without CAS (white noise) was calculated as raw decibel TEOAE suppression as well as normalized TEOAE suppression expressed in percent. In each subject, sets of measurements were performed twice. Reliability was evaluated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient, the standard error of measurement, and the minimum detectable change (MDC). The study included 40 normally hearing subjects (20 men; 20 women). The estimates of MOCR for both genders were similar. Nevertheless, the reliability of the MOCR was poorer in men, with an MDC around twice that of women. This can be only partially attributed to slightly lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in men, since we used strict procedures calling for high SNRs (around 20 dB on average). Furthermore, even when we compared subgroups with similar SNRs, there was still lower MOCR reliability in men. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are currently used as a valuable audiological test or as a hearing screening tool. There are many commercially available OAE recording systems that are used both for clinical practice and for research. However, there is little information in the literature comparing their performance in detecting hearing loss. The purpose of this prospective, nonrandomized, and controlled study was to evaluate the screening performance obtained from recent and older versions of the Otometrics Accuscreen OAE screening device in comparison with the Otodynamics ILO-292 OAE system, which has been used as the gold standard. Testing included otoscopic assessment, pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and transiently evoked OAE (TEOAE) recordings. There was about a 77% agreement between the two versions of the Accuscreen device. Agreement between the two Accuscreen devices and the ILO was approximately 70% for the old and 80% for the new. The newer version of Accuscreen seems to perform better than the old, being more consistent with the reference ILO system and with the audiometry profiles of the tested subjects. In order to set robust standards for OAE evaluation and analysis, additional studies comparing different OAE hearing screening systems are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system is thought to be responsible for modulation of peripheral hearing through descending (efferent) pathways. This study investigated the connection between peripheral hearing function and conscious attention during two different modality tasks, auditory and visual. Peripheral hearing function was evaluated by analyzing the amount of suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) by contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS), a well-known effect of the MOC. Simultaneously, attention was evaluated by event-related potentials (ERPs). Although the ERPs showed clear differences in processing of auditory and visual tasks, there were no differences in the levels of OAE suppression. We also analyzed OAEs for the highest magnitude resonant mode signal detected by the matching pursuit method, but again did not find a significant effect of task, and no difference in noise level or number of rejected trials. However, for auditory tasks, the amplitude of the P3 cognitive wave negatively correlated with the level of OAE suppression. We conclude that there seems to be no change in MOC function when performing different modality tasks, although the cortex still remains able to modulate some aspects of MOC activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of wideband energy absorbance in diagnosing otosclerosis by comparing the differences in acoustic absorbance between otosclerotic and normal ears. Exactly 90 surgically confirmed otosclerotic ears were included in the test group. The control group consisted of 126 matched normal-hearing subjects. The Titan hearing test platform (Interacoustics) was used for absorbance and acoustic immittance tests. Energy absorbance, measured at tympanometric peak pressure, was analyzed in the range 226–8000 Hz. Differences between normal and otosclerotic ears were analyzed in quarter-octave bands. Wideband absorbance, i.e., absorbance averaged over the 226–2000 Hz band, and resonance frequency were calculated and compared between normal and otosclerotic ears. Significant differences between the absorbance of normal and otosclerotic ears were found, especially at low and middle frequencies. No significant effect of ear side or gender was observed. For average wideband absorbance and resonance frequency, less pronounced (although significant) differences were found between normal and otosclerotic ears. Measurement of peak-pressure energy absorbance, averaged over a frequency band around 650 Hz, provides a valid criterion in testing for otosclerosis. The test is highly effective, with a sensitivity and specificity of over 85% and area under receiver operating characteristic curve above 0.9. Average wideband absorbance can also be used, but its effectiveness is lower. Other immittance-related measures are considerably less effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]