Search

Sediments are dredged from waterways to maintain maritime activities and prevent floods. Exorbitant amounts of money are budgeted for the removal of dredged material (DM) and its disposal in landfills. We investigated the potential for reuse of DM as a road construction material using so-called bio-enzyme products as stabilizing agents. To improve the mechanical properties of DM, such as compressive strength, compressibility, Atterberg limits and the California bearing ratio (CBR), mixtures of DM were tested with two different amounts of a commercially available bio-enzyme product, which yielded enzymatically stabilized dredged material (ESDM). Unconfined compressive strength (UCS), compaction and Atterberg limits were measured in accordance with ASTM specifications on all samples. Data show that the addition of bio-enzymes resulted in increases in UCS but did not affect the optimum moisture content (OMC), maximum dry unit weight or Atterberg limits of the DM. A comparative field study was carried out to evaluate the CBR of the CH subgrade before and after treatments with the bio-enzyme product and with lime as a traditional stabilizing agent. The results of the field study supported the laboratory findings. Based on these data and results from the literature, models predicting the effect of bio-enzyme treatments on the value of CBR and of UCS were developed statistically. These models also underlined the importance of the clay fraction and PI values for the improvement of the engineering properties of soil using bio-enzyme additives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A continuous treatment process using steel slag powder including foam drying and carbonation processes (termed the SSFD-C method) is a novel technology previously developed in our laboratory. It has achieved the first application of carbonation solidification technology to recycle marine dredged material with high moisture content. The aim of this study is to investigate CO2 uptake and performance regulation in the preparation of carbonated eco-aggregates (CEAs) from dredged soils processed using the SSFD-C method. Steel slag and lime hydrate independently contribute to the strength of CEAs. However, the influence they exert on CO2 uptake, along with other properties, such as pH values and water absorption of CEAs, remains unclear. Furthermore, it is important to clarify whether the soluble silica in a CEA originates from dredged soil or steel slag, as a CEA has the potential to provide silica nutrients to plants. The findings indicated that within the initial three hours of carbonation, the strength of CEAs could approximate 65% of the ultimate stable strength. The moisture absorption for CEAs was noted to be in the 26–30% range. Carbonation over a 24 h period can lower the pH of the CEA to less than 10, and the carbonation reaction can penetrate the core of the 10–15 mm CEA pellets. Carbonation of the lime hydrate fraction was more favorable to increase the CO2 uptake of the CEA, and carbonation of the steel slag fraction was more favorable to decrease the pH value and water absorption of the CEA. The water-soluble silicon of the CEA was found to have been mainly derived from steel slag, while it was established that carbonation could increase the water-soluble silicon content of the CEA by 5–8 times. The result of this study could provide theoretical guidance for regulating the performance of CEAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Huangmao Island dumping area is adjacent to the Pearl River Estuary in the South China Sea. From its first dumping activity in 1986 to 2017, 6750 × 104 m3 dredged materials were dumped in this dumping area. Sediment pollution levels, ecological risk, and benthic communities in 2011–2017 were evaluated; the results showed that the concentrations of the heavy metals (HMs; except Hg) in surface sediments of the dumping area met the class I standard of marine sediment quality (GB 18668-2002). HMs in the surface sediments were relatively high in the northern and central areas but relatively low in the south of the dumping area. Speculation was that the spatial variation in HM concentrations might be caused by dumping activities. The Nemerow index implied that the contaminated area was mainly in the north of the dumping area (S1, S2, and S3), where the dumping amount was the largest. The potential ecological risk (Eir) indices of Zn, As, Cu, and Pb indicate that these metals posed a low risk to the ecosystem of the dumping area, whereas Cd and Hg posed a high risk at some stations. The geoaccumulation indices (Igeo) of Zn, As, Cu, and Pb specified no pollution or light pollution in the study area, whereas those of Cd and Hg in most years indicated mild contamination levels. Benthic organisms in the study area were arthropods, chordates, annelids, mollusks, echinoderms, nemertinean, coelenterate, and echiuran, among which arthropods were the most abundant. The abundance of taxa and density of benthic organisms had a little difference among the stations within the dumping area, but were significantly lower than those of the stations outside the dumping area. In addition, non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis confirmed that the observed patterns separated the stations within the dumping area from stations outside the dumping area. The evaluation results of the HMs revealed that the dumping area with a large dumping amount was more severely polluted. Dumping dredged materials seemed to have a negative impact on the benthic community in the dumping area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

More than 1.15 million cubic meters (1.5 million cubic yards) of sediment require annual removal from harbors and ports along Ohio's Lake Erie coast. Disposing of these materials into landfills depletes land resources, while open water placement of these materials deteriorates water quality. There are more than 14,000 acres of revitalizing brownfields in Cleveland, U.S., many containing up to 90% impervious surface, which does not allow "infiltration" based stormwater practices required by contemporary site-based stormwater regulation. This study investigates the potential of sintering the dredged material from the Harbor of Cleveland in Lake Erie to produce lightweight aggregate (LWA), and apply the LWA to green roof construction. Chemical and thermal analyses revealed the sintered material can serve for LWA production when preheated at 550 °C and sintered at a higher temperature. Through dewatering, drying, sieving, pellet making, preheating, and sintering with varying temperatures (900-1100 °C), LWAs with porous microstructures are produced with specific gravities ranging from 1.46 to 1.74, and water absorption capacities ranging from 11% to 23%. The water absorption capacity of the aggregate decreases as sintering temperature increases. The LWA was incorporated into the growing media of a green roof plot, which has higher water retention capacity than the conventional green roof system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Dredged Material Decision Tool (DMDT) was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to allow project managers, stakeholders, and communities to quantify environmental, economic, and social considerations of using dredged material for beneficial purposes. Dredged material may be disposed in a confined disposal facility (CDF); however, this option is unfavorable because of the finite capacity problems these facilities pose. A more sustainable option is to use dredged materials beneficially such as construction material, for habitat restoration, or for brownfield remediation projects. This study demonstrates the applicability of the DMDT to three relevant candidate projects: (1) Dog Beach, Greenwood, and Lee Street Beaches (Evanston, IL, USA); (2) New York-New Jersey Harbor (New York/New Jersey); and (3) Poplar Island (Chesapeake Bay). The DMDT requires the project information and then completion of worksheets with each criteria (biophysical environment, economic, governance, social, and built environment) ranked, weighed, and scored. The DMDT is applied for all potential alternatives and the results are then analyzed to select the best beneficial reuse alternative. It was found that for the beaches in Evanston, the most beneficial option was on-beach placement with hydraulic dredging. The best option for the New Jersey Harbor was found to be using for brownfield and landfill remediation. The best option for Poplar Island was the lateral and vertical expansion of 50% uplands and 50% wetlands. Overall, DMDT is found to be a valuable tool to facilitate the evaluation of multi-criteria based on the project-specific data and help select the best beneficial use alternative for the dredged material. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Action Levels (ALs) are thresholds which are used to determine whether dredged material is suitable for disposal at sea by providing a proxy risk assessment for potential impacts to biological features such as fish and benthos. This project tested proposed scenarios for changes to the UK Action Levels to determine the likely implications for navigational dredge licensing in England and Wales. Approximately 3000 sample data records from 2009 to 2018 were collated with varying numbers of concentrations for contaminant parameters including trace metals, organotins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Initially, these data were assessed using current ALs to determine the percentages of the samples with levels below AL1 (generally acceptable for disposal), between AL1 and AL2 and those showing levels above AL2 (generally unacceptable for disposal). These results were then used to compare with the results of the proposed new AL scenarios for each contaminant type derived from literature reviews and historic data. The results indicate that there are changes to the ALs which could be made such as updating the current ALs with the revised ALs, as well as the introduction of ALs where there are currently none set. The benefits of changing the ALs include reducing contaminant disposal to the marine environment and increased transparency in decision making. Any proposed scenarios will need to be phased in carefully in full liaison with stakeholders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A variety of studies recently proved the applicability of different dried, fine-grained dredged materials as replacement material for erosion-resistant sea dike covers. In Rostock, Germany, a large-scale field experiment was conducted, in which different dredged materials were tested with regard to installation technology, stability, turf development, infiltration, and erosion resistance. The infiltration experiments to study the development of a seepage line in the dike body showed unexpected measurement results. Due to the high complexity of the problem, standard geo-hydraulic models proved to be unable to analyze these results. Therefore, different methods of inverse infiltration modeling were applied, such as the parameter estimation tool (PEST) and the AMALGAM algorithm. In the paper, the two approaches are compared and discussed. A sensitivity analysis proved the presumption of a non-linear model behavior for the infiltration problem and the Eigenvalue ratio indicates that the dike infiltration is an ill-posed problem. Although this complicates the inverse modeling (e.g., termination in local minima), parameter sets close to an optimum were found with both the PEST and the AMALGAM algorithms. Together with the field measurement data, this information supports the rating of the effective material properties of the applied dredged materials used as dike cover material. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]