Search

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are not a single disease, but rather a heterogenous group of entities which are increasingly subclassified according to recurrent genetic abnormalities. Chromosomal translocations involving meningioma 1 (MN1) and ETS variant 6 (ETV6) genes are extremely rare, but recurrent in myeloid neoplasms. We describe the case of a patient with a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with neutrophilia, who developed an extramedullary T-lymphoblastic crisis with the t(12;22)(p13;q12) translocation as the only cytogenetic abnormality. This case shares several clinical and molecular features with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia. The treatment of this patient was challenging, as the disease proved to be highly refractory to chemotherapy, with allogenic stem cell transplantation as the only curative option. This clinical presentation has not been reported in association with these genetic alterations and supports the concept of a hematopoietic neoplasm originating in an early uncommitted precursor cell. Additionally, it stresses the importance of molecular characterization in the classification and prognostic stratification of these entities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although mutation profiling of defined genes is recommended for classification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, screening of targeted gene panels using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is not always routinely used as standard of care. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess whether extended molecular monitoring using NGS adds clinical value for risk assessment in real-world AML patients. We analyzed a cohort of 268 newly diagnosed AML patients. We compared the prognostic stratification of our study population according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations, before and after the incorporation of the extended mutational profile information obtained by NGS. Without access to NGS data, 63 patients (23%) failed to be stratified into risk groups. After NGS data, only 27 patients (10%) failed risk stratification. Another 33 patients were re-classified as adverse-risk patients once the NGS data was incorporated. In total, access to NGS data refined risk assessment for 62 patients (23%). We further compared clinical outcomes with prognostic stratification, and observed unexpected outcomes associated with FLT3 mutations. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the prognostic utility of screening AML patients for multiple gene mutations by NGS and underscores the need for further studies to refine the current risk classification criteria.