Search

Purpose. This in vitro study compared the vertical marginal discrepancy (MD) and absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) between the zirconia substructure and titanium (Ti)-base abutment before and after cementation. Material and methods. An intraoral scanner (CEREC Omnicam scanner; Dentsply Sirona) was used to scan the dental model of missing tooth 36 and obtain a three-dimensional virtual model. It was designed and milled for 25 zirconia superstructures (inCoris ZI meso F2 L, Dentsply Sirona). The samples were cemented to Ti bases. The MD and AMD were measured for each sample by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) before and after cementation. Results. The overall mean values of MD measurements before and after cementation were 14.12 μm and 20.28 μm, respectively. The overall mean values of AMD measurements prior to and after substructure cementation on the Ti base were 54.85 μm and 116.0 μm, respectively. ANOVA revealed significant differences in MD (p = 0.001) and AMD (p < 0.001) before and after cementation. Conclusions. Significant differences were observed in MD and AMD values before and after cementation. The MD and AMD values were significantly lower before cementation than after cementation. The mean MD and AMD values were clinically acceptable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A wide variety of titanium (Ti) alloy dental implant systems are available and as a result, choosing the correct system has become a challenge. Cleanliness of the dental implant surface affects osseointegration but surface cleanliness may be jeopardized during manufacturing. The purpose of this study was to assess the cleanliness of three implant systems. Fifteen implants per system were examined with scanning electron microscopy to identify and count foreign particles. Particle chemical composition analysis was performed with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Particles were categorized according to size and location. Particles on the outer and inner threads were quantitatively compared. A second scan was performed after exposing the implants to room air for 10 min. Carbon, among other elements, was found on the surface of all implant groups. Zimmer Biomet dental implants had higher particle numbers than other brands. Cortex and Keystone dental implants showed similar distribution patterns. The outer surface had higher particle numbers. Cortex dental implants were the cleanest. The change in particle numbers after exposure was not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Most of the implants studied were contaminated. Particle distribution patterns vary with the manufacturer. The wider and outer areas of the implant have a higher probability of contamination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the changes of light reflection% on two materials (monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate) after using two external staining kits following by thermocycling. Methods: Specimens were sectioned from monolithic zirconia (n = 60) and lithium disilicate (n = 60) then divided into six groups (n = 20). Two different types of external staining kits were used and applied to the specimens. The light reflection% was measured before staining, after staining and after thermocycling using a spectrophotometer. Results: The light reflection% of zirconia was significantly higher compared to lithium disilicate at the beginning of the study (p = 0.005), after staining with kit 1 (p = 0.005) and kit 2 (p = 0.005) and after thermocycling (p = 0.005). For both materials, the light reflection% was lower after staining with Kit 1 compared to kit 2 (p < 0.043). After thermocycling, the light reflection% of lithium disilicate increased (p = 0.027) and was unchanged with Zirconia (p = 0.527). Conclusions: There is a difference between the materials regarding light reflection% as the monolithic zirconia showed higher light reflection% comparing lithium disilicate throughout the entire experiment. For lithium disilicate, we recommend using kit 1 as we found that, after thermocycling, the light reflection% of kit 2 was increased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of different heights of ti-base abutments on the color of anterior screw-retained zirconia restorations fabricated using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technologies may affect the optical clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the color parameters of zirconia crowns in different shades on ti-base abutments. Identical specimens (N = 160) were milled to restore the screw-retained central maxillary incisor crown, using 5% mol yttria zirconia (5Y-TZP). The specimens were designed using computer design software to match 3.5 mm and 5.5-mm ti-base abutments and milled using one CAD-CAM technology. Specimens were divided into four main groups depending on zirconia shade (A1/0, A2/3, A3.5/4 and B2/3) and then assigned to two subgroups according to ti-base height. Color measurements in the CIELab coordinates were made using a spectrophotometer under room-light conditions. Color difference (ΔE*) values were calculated using the CIE76 and CIEDE2000 formula. Within the group of A0/1 and A2/3, for 5.5 mm abutment height, a significant difference was found between the means of colors ∆E00 and ∆Eab (p < 0.01). Using a 5.5 mm-height ti-base abutment may produce a clinically unacceptable outcome (ΔEab > 2) in A1/0 and A2/3 color groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the strain levels in the peri-implant bone as generated by the blade-like implant (BLI) and the screw-type implant (STI) with two different internal connections (hexagonal and conical) and with a 1:1 and 2:1 crown/implant (C/I) ratio. Methods: The implants (BLI and STI) were placed into sawbones according to the manufacturer's protocol. Two strain gauges, horizontal and vertical to the implant axis, were placed around each implant on the bone surface 1 mm from the cervical part. Each implant was loaded by a material testing machine at a force of 100 N. Micro-strains (με) generated in the surrounding bone were measured by a strain gauge and recorded. Results: Recorded micro-strains were not significant in both the insertion and loading phases (p < 0.0625). The average recorded micro-strain values were lower in the horizontal dimension of STI with hexagonal connection when the C/I ratio was 2:1 compared with BLI, 210 με and 443 με, respectively. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, implant design, implant-abutment connection and C/I ratio did not influence strain values in bone and there is no statistically significant effect of these parameters on bone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A marginal fit of all-ceramic crowns is a prerequisite for the long-term clinical success of a dental restoration. Few in vivo studies have investigated the effect of the film thickness of various luting agents on vertical discrepancy. This in vivo study evaluated the influence of three luting cements on the occlusal vertical discrepancy of milled crowns using a complete digital workflow. Forty-three patients treated in a students' clinic in Tel-Aviv University with 45 single posterior digitally prepared monolithic crowns were included in the study. The crowns were randomly divided into three groups using different resin luting agents: self-adhesive resin cement, resin-modified glass ionomer cement and adhesive resin cement. The crowns were intra-orally scanned before and after cementation. The two standard tessellation language (STL) files for each crown were superimposed using digital software, and between four and six measurements were made at the occlusal surface to demonstrate the occlusal and marginal discrepancies. One-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) was used. The vertical occlusal discrepancy ranged from 2 to 38 μm. The mean vertical discrepancy values were (µm): self-adhesive resin = 12.93 ± 4.74, resin-modified glass ionomer = 19.05 ± 4.60 and adhesive resin = 13.69 ± 5.17. There were significant differences between resin-modified and self-adhesive cement groups (p = 0.004), and between resin-modified and adhesive resin cement groups (p = 0.013). Distal marginal ridge measurements were significantly different between resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-adhesive resin cement group (p < 0.001) and the adhesive resin cement group (p = 0.021). There were no significant differences between the discrepancy values at the two measurement points in the self-adhesive cement group (p = 0.377), nor the resin-modified glass ionomer group (p = 0.388), or the adhesive resin cement group (p = 0.905). The cementation procedure with various resin cements results in occlusal vertical discrepancies within standard clinical acceptability. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement produced more vertical discrepancy than adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements did. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]