Search

Background/Objectives: Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) represents an early stage of metastatic disease characterized by a limited number of lesions. Recent advancements in imaging and treatment have revived interest in personalized therapies, including metastasis-directed radiotherapy (OMDRT) and primary prostate radiotherapy (PPR). This study evaluates the impact of OMDRT timing and the role of PPR on survival outcomes in OMPC patients; Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 82 patients with OMPC who underwent OMDRT between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed. Patients were classified based on OMDRT timing (early vs. late) and disease type (synchronous vs. metachronous). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints, assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models; Results: Among the patients, 36 (43.9%) had synchronous and 46 (56.1%) had metachronous OMD. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 77.5% and 88.5%, respectively. Early OMDRT significantly improved PFS (HR 0.461, 95% CI: 0.257-0.826, p = 0.009) and OS (HR 0.219, 95% CI: 0.080-0.603, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis showed the most favorable outcomes for synchronous OMD patients receiving early OMDRT, with a median PFS of 22.2 months and a 5-year survival rate of 42.1%. The treatment of the primary prostate provided a survival benefit in the OS of synchronous OMD patients (5-year 83.1% vs. 50%, p = 0.025), and there was a further improvement in OS after PPR (5-year 87.7% vs. 50%, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Early OMDRT significantly enhances survival outcomes in OMPC, in both synchronous and metachronous cases. The integration of PPR can further improve results, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and personalized treatment strategies. To more definitively clarify our findings across various clinical situations, further studies with larger cohorts or prospective designs are necessary.

The canonical mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are typically activating mutations in KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). GISTs with non-canonical mutations are a heterogeneous group. Here, we examined tropomyosin-related kinase (TRK) fusion in GIST cases without KIT/PDGFRA mutations ( KIT/PDGFRA wild-type (WT) GISTs). We retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with GISTs at the Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, between January 1998 and December 2016. Thirty-one patients with KIT/PDGFRA WT GISTs were included in the analysis. TRK expression in tumor samples was assessed by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase ( NTRK : the gene encoding TRK) rearrangement was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). IHC analyses revealed that five cases in this cohort exhibited a weak to moderate TRK expression. NTRK1 fusions were detected in three tumor samples, and two samples harbored NTRK3 fusions. The remaining 26 samples did not harbor NTRK fusions. Two types of NTRK fusions were detected, and the overall NTRK fusion frequency in KIT/PDGFRA WT GIST cases was 16% (5/31). Our data provide insights into the molecular alterations underpinning KIT/PDGFRA WT GISTs. More effort should be devoted to improve methods to identify this distinct disease subtype within the KIT/PDGFRA WT GIST group.

This study investigates the types and degrees of physical and psychological discomfort experienced by hematopoietic stem cell donors before, during, and after the donation process in order to provide helpful information for developing education programs that can help donors to cope with their discomforts. One hundred and thirty-one individuals who donated hematopoietic stem cells from 2017 to 2019 were asked to self-report the types and degrees of physical and psychological discomfort they felt in the process, and the results were analyzed using SPSS. All participants donated peripheral blood stem cells; the most commonly reported physical discomfort was myalgia (72.5%), followed by bone pain (62.6%), fatigue (60.3%), and headache (55.0%). Of the donors, 88.5% responded that they experienced psychological discomforts, including fear (44.3%), anxiety (44.3%), stress (39.7%), depression (31.3%), loneliness (31.3%), regret (29.8%), and ambivalence (23.7%). In particular, female donors experienced more discomfort than males in rash (Z = -2.123, p = 0.034), fear (Z = -2.851, p = 0.004), and anxiety (Z = -1.861, p = 0.044). Therefore, it is necessary for healthcare providers and experts to make efforts to educate and help donors to prepare and mitigate their discomfort throughout the donation process, and to strategically manage donors' well-being by monitoring and evaluating their discomfort levels and providing interventions if necessary.