Simple Summary: Plant disease classification is a crucial research field due to its practical applications in agriculture. While many methods have been developed, significant progress has been made using convolutional neural networks. However, training these models usually requires large datasets, which are difficult to collect in the domain of plant diseases. This challenge is common across various fields, leading to the development of advanced methods, like few-shot learning. Few-shot learning enables image classification even when fewer than 10 examples are available for each category. Many of these methods rely on identifying similarities between images. Several loss functions used in few-shot learning, along with popular neural network architectures, were evaluated in this study to classify 68 classes of plant diseases. The dataset consisted of 4000 images collected in real-world conditions, making it ideal for testing these methods. The results highlight the most effective approaches for model organization and training, along with the preferred similarity learning techniques. Additionally, the reduced dataset has been published online, enabling other researchers to compare their methods and contribute to advancements in this field. Early detection of plant diseases is crucial for agro-holdings, farmers, and smallholders. Various neural network architectures and training methods have been employed to identify optimal solutions for plant disease classification. However, research applying one-shot or few-shot learning approaches, based on similarity determination, to the plantdisease classification domain remains limited. This study evaluates different loss functions used in similarity learning, including Contrastive, Triplet, Quadruplet, SphereFace, CosFace, and ArcFace, alongside various backbone networks, such as MobileNet, EfficientNet, ConvNeXt, and ResNeXt. Custom datasets of real-life images, comprising over 4000 samples across 68 classes of plant diseases, pests, and their effects, were utilized. The experiments evaluate standard transfer learning approaches alongside similarity learning methods based on two classes of loss function. Results demonstrate the superiority of cosine-based methods over Siamese networks in embedding extraction for disease classification. Effective approaches for model organization and training are determined. Additionally, the impact of data normalization is tested, and the generalization ability of the models is assessed using a special dataset consisting of 400 images of difficult-to-identify plant disease cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]