Search

BAF complexes are chromatin remodelling complexes made up of 15 subunits which overview transcription regulation. A subset of their subunits are notoriously linked to cancer, with the examples of SMARCB1, SMARCA4, ARID1A/1B and PBRM1. The complexes act as tumor suppressor genes, commonly mutated in a wide array of malignancies with an overrepresentation of sarcomas and tumors of the central nervous system. The recurrent inactivation of their genes points towards their driving role in the tumorigenesis of SMARCB1 in malignant rhabdoid tumors and SMARCA4 in small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. These tumors are morphologically similar composed of solid sheets of cells displaying vesicular nuclei dotted with clear chromatin and conspicuous nucleoli. Genomically, they share simple diploid profiles with no other alterations than in the culprit gene. Other mesenchymal tumors, distinct from malignant rhabdoid tumors are associated with BAF alterations, namely epithelioid sarcomas, SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcomas. BAF subunits are mostly inactivated through mutations or deletions but also occur through translocations in medullary carcinoma of the kidney and synovial sarcomas. Apart from tumors displaying recurrent alterations of the complexes, some variants or tumor variants display BAF alterations, including epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheet tumors and poorly differentiated chordomas. Lastly, some malignancies display low frequency of BAF alterations, in keeping with their passenger role in tumorigenesis with the example of dedifferentiated carcinomas, especially in colon, lung and uterus. BAF complexes alterations correlate with morphological features recognizable by microscopy, paving the way for their routine diagnosis and potential therapeutic prospects., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Ewing sarcoma family of tumors are mainly aggressive sarcomas of bone and also arising in soft tissues, which share common features: morphological features of basophilic round cell tumors, immunohistochemical features by expression of membrane CD99 protein, and genetic features with a translocation involving EWS and FLI1 in approximately 90% of cases. The discovery of this translocation has made it possible to unify in a single entity several lesions such as PNET, neuropitheliomas, Askin tumors, Ewing sarcomas… Since then, the extensive use of molecular/genetic methods has helped to identify an increasing number of molecular anomalies in unclassified round cell sarcomas, these sarcomas often harboring an atypical morphology and a less frequent CD99 positivity. Besides the rearrangements between the FET family of genes (EWS or FUS) and the wide ETS family of genes (FLI1, ERG, FEV, ETV…), new partner genes are gradually identified: cases with EWS-non ETS partners are extremely rare, but there are more important groups which are CIC-DUX4 and BCOR-CCNB3 translocation-positive sarcomas. These findings raise the problem of the nosological borders of the Ewing/PNET entity and its links with new "Ewing-like" groups of tumors, and raise the therapeutic problems. The forward-looking identification of new round cell sarcomas should enable studies of wider series to try to answer these questions., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Major advances in their definition and classification and the understanding of their molecular mechanisms have recently been made. These advances have resulted in the delineation of a treatment that has become a model of targeted therapy in oncology. GISTs are defined as tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, but also of the mesentery and peritoneum, constituted by a proliferation of usually spindle-shaped, rarely epithelioid cells, usually, but not consistently expressing the KIT protein. Most GISTs are associated with molecular abnormalities in two target genes: KIT (which encodes the KIT protein) and PDGFRA (which encodes the A chain of the PDGF receptor). The diagnosis of GIST relies on histological arguments (proliferation of spindle-shaped cells in 70% of cases, of epithelioid cells in 20%; histological variants are rare and sometimes misleading) and on immunohistochemical arguments (expression of KIT in 95%, usually associated with CD34 expression in 60%-70% of cases). The demonstration of mutations in target genes is required only in cases that are histologically suggestive but KIT-negative; beyond this indication, this is only undertaken in research protocols. The differential diagnosis of GIST includes the other mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, such as leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas, and the digestive locations of some sarcomas; it relies on both histological and immunohistochemical arguments. The evaluation of the prognosis is essential. According to the current concept, every GIST carries a risk of malignancy, which may vary from very low to very high. Prognosis is based on a simple algorithm using two histoprognostic parameters, i.e., tumor size and mitotic index. The treatment of localized GIST is surgical resection, which must be complete; that of advanced or unresectable GIST is based on the use of a targeted therapy, imatinib, which is a pharmacological antagonist of the KIT protein. Proper understanding and utilisation of the diagnostic criteria and classification of GIST by pathologists are essential for good patient management.