Search

Background: The results of a clinical trial are given in terms of primary and secondary outcomes that are obtained for each patient. Just as an instrument should provide the same result when the same object is measured repeatedly, the agreement of the adjudication of a clinical outcome between various raters is fundamental to interpret study results. The reliability of the adjudication of study endpoints determined by examination of the electronic case report forms of a pragmatic trial has not previously been tested., Methods: The electronic case report forms of 62/434 (14%) patients selected to be observed in a study on brain AVMs were independently examined twice (4 weeks apart) by 8 raters who judged whether each patient had reached the following study endpoints: (1) new intracranial hemorrhage related to AVM or to treatment; (2) new non-hemorrhagic neurological event; (3) increase in mRS ≥1; (4) serious adverse events (SAE). Inter and intra-rater reliability were assessed using Gwet's AC1 (κG) statistics, and correlations with mRS score using Cramer's V test., Results: There was almost perfect agreement for intracranial hemorrhage (92% agreement; κG = 0.84 (95%CI: 0.76-0.93), and substantial agreement for SAEs (88% agreement; κG = 0.77 (95%CI: 0.67-0.86) and new non-hemorrhagic neurological event (80% agreement; κG = 0.61 (95%CI: 0.50-0.72). Most endpoints correlated (V = 0.21-0.57) with an increase in mRS of ≥1, an endpoint which was itself moderately reliable (76% agreement; κG = 0.54 (95%CI: 0.43-0.64)., Conclusion: Study endpoints of a pragmatic trial were shown to be reliable. More studies on the reliability of pragmatic trial endpoints are needed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of nonaneurysmal perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage (NAPSAH) on Noncontrast Head CT (NCCT) between numerous raters., Materials and Methods: 45 NCCT of adult patients with SAH who also had a catheter angiography (CA) were independently evaluated by 48 diverse raters; 45 raters performed a second assessment one month later. For each case, raters were asked: 1) whether they judged the bleeding pattern to be perimesencephalic; 2) whether there was blood anterior to brainstem; 3) complete filling of the anterior interhemispheric fissure (AIF); 4) extension to the lateral part of the sylvian fissure (LSF); 5) frank intraventricular hemorrhage; 6) whether in the hypothetical presence of a negative CT angiogram they would still recommend CA. An automatic NAPSAH diagnosis was also generated by combining responses to questions 2-5. Reliability was estimated using Gwet's AC1 (κ G ), and the relationship between the NCCT diagnosis of NAPSAH and the recommendation to perform CA using Cramer's V test. Multi-rater accuracy of NCCT in predicting negative CA was explored., Results: Inter-rater reliability for the presence of NAPSAH was moderate (κ G = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47, 0.69), but improved to substantial when automatically generated (κ G = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59, 0.81). The most reliable criteria were the absence of AIF filling (κ G = 0.79) and extension to LSF (κ G = 0.79). Mean intra-rater reliability was substantial (κ G = 0.65). NAPSAH weakly correlated with CA decision (V = 0.50). Mean sensitivity and specificity were 58% (95%CI: 44%, 71%) and 83 % (95%CI: 72 %, 94%), respectively., Conclusion: NAPSAH remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The NCCT diagnosis was moderately reliable and its impact on clinical decisions modest., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adhesive arachnoiditis is a rare yet serious complication that may occur following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In this circumstance, it is mainly due to ruptured vertebral artery (VA) or posterior inferior artery (PICA) aneurysms. It disrupts cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow leading to complications such as spinal arachnoiditis, syringomyelia, trapped 4th ventricle, or a combination of these conditions. Evidence for effective treatment strategies is currently limited. We aimed to review the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, treatment, complications, outcomes, and prognosis of cranio-vertebral junction and spinal adhesive arachnoiditis resulting from ruptured VA and PICA aneurysms., Methods: This study involved a comprehensive literature review and complemented by our own case. We focused on adult cases of arachnoiditis, syringomyelia, and trapped 4th ventricle with SAH caused by ruptured VA or PICA aneurysms, excluding cases unrelated to these aneurysms and those with insufficient data., Results: The study included 22 patients, with a mean age of 52.4 years. Symptoms commonly manifest within the first year after SAH and timely diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. Treatment approaches included lysis of adhesions and various shunt procedures. Most patients showed improvement post-treatment, though symptom recurrence is significant., Conclusion: Adhesive arachnoiditis is a critical complication following SAH, most commonly from ruptured VA and PICA aneurysms. Early detection and individualized treatment based on the type of arachnoiditis and CSF flow impact are crucial for effective management. This study underscores the need for tailored treatment strategies and further research in this field., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

The vertebral arteries (VAs) constitute most of the arterial supply to the posterior cerebral vascular circulation. They have anatomical specificities and may have variants that are critical for neurointerventionists to recognize in order to design open or endovascular surgical treatment. This review addresses each segment of the VA including its origin and discusses the branches and relevant anatomical features for neurointerventions., (Copyright © 2024 The Author. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)