Search

Objective: This study investigates the clinical course of recovery of apraxia after left-hemisphere stroke and the underlying neuroanatomical correlates for persisting or recovering deficits in relation to the major processing streams in the network for motor cognition., Methods: 90 patients were examined during the acute (4.74 ± 2.73 days) and chronic (14.3 ± 15.39 months) stage after left-hemisphere stroke for deficits in meaningless imitation, as well as production and conceptual errors in tool use pantomime. Lesion correlates for persisting or recovering deficits were analyzed with an extension of the non-parametric Brunner-Munzel rank-order test for multi-factorial designs (two-way repeated-measures ANOVA) using acute images., Results: Meaningless imitation and tool use production deficits persisted into the chronic stage. Conceptual errors in tool use pantomime showed an almost complete recovery. Imitation errors persisted after occipitotemporal and superior temporal lesions in the dorso-dorsal stream. Chronic pantomime production errors were related to the supramarginal gyrus, the key structure of the ventro-dorsal stream. More anterior lesions in the ventro-dorsal stream (ventral premotor cortex) were additionally associated with poor recovery of production errors in pantomime. Conceptual errors in pantomime after temporal and supramarginal gyrus lesions persisted into the chronic stage. However, they resolved completely when related to angular gyrus or insular lesions., Conclusion: The diverging courses of recovery in different apraxia tasks can be related to different mechanisms. Critical lesions to key structures of the network or entrance areas of the processing streams lead to persisting deficits in the corresponding tasks. Contrary, lesions located outside the core network but inducing a temporary network dysfunction allow good recovery e.g., of conceptual errors in pantomime. The identification of lesion correlates for different long-term recovery patterns in apraxia might also allow early clinical prediction of the course of recovery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest H.U. received honoraria for lectures from Bracco, Bayer, Union Chimique Belge (UCB) pharma, Eisai, and Stryker. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Apraxia is frequently described after left hemisphere stroke and results from lesions to a complex network for motor cognition with dorso-dorsal, ventro-dorsal and ventral processing streams. Apraxia also occurs after right hemisphere stroke, but lesion correlates and underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. To clarify the role of the right hemisphere in apraxic deficits and the influence of neglect, we prospectively examined apraxia (imitation of meaningless postures and pantomime of tool use) and neglect in 138 acute right hemisphere stroke patients with first-ever ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory and identified corresponding lesion correlates using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Imitation of meaningless postures was impaired as frequently as after left hemisphere stroke (38.4%) and was significantly associated with neglect. Imitation of meaningless postures was related to temporal (middle temporal gyrus, temporoparietal junction, superior temporal gyrus and sulcus), parietal (angular gyrus, parieto-occpitpial sulcus), secondary sensorimotor cortex and (peri-)insular lesions. Presence of neglect dichotomized the results: a lesion correlate for isolated imitation without neglect was found in the right parieto-occipital cortex, while imitation deficits, when co-occurring with neglect, were related to lateral occipito-temporal, superior temporal sulcus and (peri-)insular lesions. Pantomime of tool use deficits, typical for apraxia after left hemisphere lesions, were found in only 5 cases (3.6%) and only in the context of neglect, and were associated with occipital lobe, ventral and anterior temporal lobe, and inferior frontal (areas 45/47) lesions. The syndrome of apraxia after right hemisphere stroke differs from apraxia after left hemisphere stroke. Imitation deficits are found in both hemispheres after dorso-dorsal stream lesions. Neglect also leads to and explains deficits in imitation and pantomime in patients with right ventral stream lesions. Therefore, in right hemisphere lesions, apraxia can either be explained as impaired visuomotor transformation or as a result of visuospatial deficits., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest HU is shareholder of the Veobrain GmbH, a spin-off of the University Medical Center Freiburg and received honoraria for lectures from Bracco, Bayer, Union Chimique Belge (UCB) pharma, and Stryker. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Visual neglect and extinction are two distinct visuospatial attention deficits that frequently occur after right hemisphere cerebral stroke. However, their different lesion profiles remain a matter of debate. In the left hemisphere, a domain-general dual-loop model with distinct computational abilities onto which several cognitive functions may project, has been proposed: a dorsal stream for sensori-motor mapping in time and space and a ventral stream for comprehension and representation of concepts. We wondered whether such a distinction may apply to visual extinction and neglect in left hemisphere lesions. Of 165 prospectively studied patients with acute left hemispheric ischemic stroke with a single lesion on MRI, 122 had no visuospatial attention deficit, 10 had extinction, 31 neglect and 2 had both, visual extinction and neglect. Voxel-based-lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM, FDR<.05) showed a clear anatomical dissociation. Extinction occurred after damage to the parietal cortex (anterior bank of the intraparietal sulcus, inferior parietal lobe, and supramarginal gyrus), while visual neglect occurred after damage mainly to the temporal lobe (superior and middle temporal lobe, anterior temporal pole), inferior ventral premotor cortex, frontal operculum, angular gyrus, and insula. Direct comparison of both conditions linked extinction to intraparietal sulcus and supramarginal gyrus (FDR<.05). Thus, in the left hemisphere extinction seems to be related to dorsal stream lesions, whereas neglect maps more on the ventral stream. These data cannot be generalized to the right hemisphere. However, a domain-general point-of-view may stimulate discussion on visuospatial attention processing also in the right hemisphere., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Urbach is a shareholder of the Veobrain Gmbh, a spin-off company of the University Medical Center Freiburg, and has received honoraria for lectures from Bracco, Bayer, Union Chimique Belge (UCB) pharma, and Stryker. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Behavioral deficits after stroke like apraxia can be related to structural lesions and to a functional state of the underlying network - three factors, reciprocally influencing each other. Combining lesion data, behavioral performance and passive functional activation of the network-of-interest, this study aims to disentangle those mutual influences and to identify 1) activation patterns associated with the presence or absence of acute apraxia in tool-associated actions and 2) the specific impact of lesion location on those activation patterns. Brain activity of 48 patients (63.31 ± 13.68 years, 35 male) was assessed in a fMRI paradigm with observation of tool-related actions during the acute phase after first-ever left-hemispheric stroke (4.83 ± 2.04 days). Behavioral assessment of apraxia in tool-related tasks was obtained independently. Brain activation was compared between patients versus healthy controls and between patient with versus without apraxia. Interaction effects of lesion location (frontal vs parietal) and behavioral performance (apraxia vs no apraxia) were assessed in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Action observation activated the ventro-dorsal parts of the network for cognitive motor function; activation was globally downregulated after stroke. Apraxic compared to non-apraxic patients showed relatively increased activity in bilateral posterior middle temporal gyrus and middle frontal gyrus/superior frontal sulcus. Altered activation occurred in regions for tool-related cognition, corroborating known functions of the ventro-dorsal and ventral streams for praxis, and comprised domain-general areas, functionally related to cognitive control. The interaction analyses revealed different levels of activation in the left anterior middle temporal gyrus in the ventral stream in apraxic patients with frontal compared to parietal lesions, suggesting a modulation of network activation in relation to behavioral performance and lesion location as separate factors. By detecting apraxia-specific activation patterns modulated by lesion location, this study underlines the necessity to combine structural lesion information, behavioral parameters and functional activation to comprehensively examine cognitive functions in acute stroke patients., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Inhibition is not a unitary construct, as different inhibition-related functions have been disentangled. The present single-case study compares performance of a patient with bilateral lesions in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and anterior insula to healthy age-matched controls in different inhibition-related tasks. Particular focus was on the resolution of proactive interference that is supposed to rely on bilateral IFG and anterior insula. Two working memory tasks previously proven sensitive to deficits in proactive interference (recent-probes, n-back) and two tasks measuring behavioral inhibition (verb generation task, Stroop task) were administered. Against expectations, the patient did not show any deficits in measures of proactive interference. However, compared to controls, she demonstrated considerably reduced performance in both measures of behavioral inhibition, thus resulting in a classical dissociation between proactive interference and behavioral inhibition. Although performance improved during the chronic phase post stroke, the overall pattern of a classical dissociation between proactive interference and behavioral inhibition remained stable across time. Taken together, the present data support the role of the IFG in inhibition-related functions, but a direct relationship between lesions in the IFG and difficulties in resolution of proactive interference could not be corroborated., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Processing of multiple or bilateral conditions presented simultaneously in both hemifields reflects the natural mode of perception in our multi-target environment, but is not yet completely understood. While region-of-interest based studies in healthy subjects reported single cortical areas as the right inferior parietal lobe (IPL) or temporoparietal junction (TPJ) to process bilateral conditions, studies in extinction patients with reduced ability in this regard suggested the right superior temporal cortex to hold a key role. The present fMRI study on healthy subjects aimed at resolving these discrepancies by contrasting bilateral versus unilateral visual conditions in a paradigm similar to the bed-side test for patients with visual extinction on a whole brain level. Additionally, reduced attentional capacity in spatial processing was investigated in normal aging. Processing of bilateral conditions compared to unilateral ones showed to require stronger activation of not one single cortical region but the entire right-lateralized ventral attention network, bilateral parietal and visual association areas. These results might suggest a conceptual difference between unilateral and bilateral spatial processing with the latter depending on additional anatomical and functional brain resources. Reduced attentional capacity in elderly subjects was associated with compensatory recruitment of contralateral functional homologues [left IPL, TPJ, frontal eye field (FEF)]. These data reveal the functional anatomy of our ability to visually process and respond to the entity of the environment and improve our understanding of neglect and extinction. Moreover, the data demonstrate that a restriction of the attentional capacity is based on processing limitations in the network of high-level cortical areas and not due to restriction in the primary sensory ones., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)