Search

Intradural spinal cord arteriovenous shunts are challenging vascular lesions with poor prognosis if left untreated. Therapeutic options include endovascular treatment, microsurgery or a combined approach. Surgical approaches are more complex if the lesions are located anteriorly and supplied by the anterior spinal artery (ASA). ASA can also vascularize shunts located on the posterior surface of the spinal cord either by transmedullary arteries, pial circumferential arteries or, if affecting the lower portions of the cord, by the anastomotic channels of the basket. Each of these vessels can be used for endovascular navigation to reach the shunts with good results if appropriate anatomical rules are followed. We describe here some technical considerations based on the anatomical analysis for the embolization of posterior spinal cord arteriovenous shunts vascularized by the anterior spinal artery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background and Purpose: New coated flow diverters (FDs) claim antithrombotic properties and increased arterial wall integration. The aim of this study is to compare in vivo endothelial coverage of coated and uncoated FD in the context of different antiplatelet regimens., Methods: Different FDs (Silk Vista - SV, Pipeline with Shield technology - PED shield and Surpass Evolve - SE) were implanted in the aorta of rabbits, all 3 in each animal with 3 different antiplatelet regimens: no antiplatelet therapy, aspirin alone, or aspirin and ticagrelor. Four weeks after FD implantation, angiography, flat-panel CT, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed before harvesting the aorta. Extensive histopathology analyses were performed including environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), multiphoton microscopy (MPM) and histological staining with qualitative and/or quantitative assessment of device coverage., Results: All 23 FDs that were implanted remained patent without hyperplasia. Qualitative stent coverage assessment revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the FD groups (p = 0.19, p = 0.45, p = 0.40, and p = 0.84 for OCT, ESEM, MPM and histology, respectively). Quantitative neointimal measurement of histological sections also showed similar results in all 3 FD groups (p = 0.70). However, there were significant differences between the 3 groups of antiplatelet regimens (p = 0.07) with a higher rate in the no antiplatelet group (p = 0.05 versus aspirin alone and p = 0.03 versus aspirin and ticagrelor)., Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that FD integration into the arterial wall is similar with coated (PED shield) and uncoated devices (SV, SE), regardless of the antiplatelet regimen. FD integration with specific surface coverage should be promoted., Trial Registration: APAFIS #2022011215518538., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS)/LVIS Jr is a self-expanding braiding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm. This study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the LVIS/LVIS Jr for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a real-world setting., Methods: This prospective, observational, multicenter study enrolled patients with unruptured, ruptured and recanalized intracranial aneurysms treated with the LVIS stents, between February 2018 to December 2019. Primary endpoint was the cumulative morbidity and mortality rate (CMMR) assessed at 12 months follow-up (FU)., Results: A total of 130 patients were included (62.3 % women, mean age 55.9 ± 11.4) on an intention-to-treat basis. Four patients (3.1 %) had 2 target aneurysms; 134 total aneurysms were treated. The aneurysms were mainly located on the middle cerebral artery (41/134; 30.6 %) and the anterior communicating artery (31/134; 23.1 %). The CMMR at 1 year linked to the procedure and/or device was 4.6 % (6/130). The overall mortality was 1.5 % (2/130), none of these deaths adjudged as being linked to the procedure and/or device. All aneurysms (134/134, 100 %) were successfully treated with LVIS stent and/or other devices. At a mean FU of 16.8 months post-procedure, complete/nearly complete occlusion was achieved in 112 aneurysms (92.6 %), and only 3 patients (2.5 %) required aneurysm retreatment., Conclusion: This study provides evidence that the LVIS/LVIS Jr devices are safe and effective in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, with very high rates of adequate occlusion at FU. These angiographic results are stable over time with an acceptable complication rate., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov under NCT03553771., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MP reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from Balt, and stock or stock options (Basecamp Vascular, Synchron, Radical Catheter, Vastrax, Intradys). LP reports consulting fees from Balt, Microvention, Phenox. FC reports consulting fees from Balt, Medtronic, Microvention, Stryker, stock or stock options (Collavidance, Intradys), and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid (Artedrone). PM reports consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Artiria, payment to his institution (Codman), and served as chairman of the adverse events monitoring committee for this study, sponsored by Microvention. GM reports consulting fees from Microvention, Balt, Stryker, honoraria for lectures (Medtronic, Johnson & Jonhson). AR reports consulting fees from Balt. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Contour Embolization Device (CED) is typically assessed using coiling angiographic outcomes. However, these scales do not address device-specific problematics. We evaluated the usability of the Bicêtre occlusion scale (BOS) with the CED., Results: BOS scores can be analyzed as BOSS 0 = no residual flow, BOSS 1 = residual flow inside the CED but with complete neck-sealing, BOSS 2 = neck-remnant, BOSS 3 = aneurysm-remnant, BOSS 1 + 3 = contrast filling inside the device and aneurysmal sac without complete neck-sealing., Conclusion: BOS usage should be encouraged as it provides a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanism of CED occlusion, especially considering the potential prognostic value of the neck sealing assessment., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Safety and efficacy of the WEB (Woven EndoBridge) device have been extensively evaluated in several good clinical practice studies. Nonetheless, the WEB had several structural evolutions overtime up to the fifth generation WEB device (WEB17). Here, we tried to understand how this may have modified our practices and enlarged our indications for its use., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients with aneurysms treated (or intended to be treated) with a WEB at our institution between July 2012 and February 2022. The time frame was split in two periods: before and after the arrival of the WEB17 in our center (February 2017)., Results: 252 patients with 276 wide-necked aneurysms were included; 78 aneurysms (28.2%) were ruptured. Successful embolization with a WEB device was achieved in 263/276 aneurysms (95.3%). With the availability of WEB17, treated aneurysms were significantly smaller (8.2 mm versus 5.9 mm, p<0.001) and off-label location significantly increased (4.4% versus 17.3%, p = 0.02) with an increase of sidewall aneurysm (4.4% versus 11.6%, p = 0.06). Also, WEB were more significantly oversized (1.05 versus 1.11, p<0.01). Adequate and complete occlusion rates increased constantly during the two periods (54.8% versus 67.5%, p = 0.08 and 74.2% versus 83.7%, p = 0.10, respectively). The proportion of ruptured aneurysms slightly increased between the two periods (24.6% versus 29.5%, p = 0.44)., Conclusions: Over the first decade of its availability, the WEB device usage shifted towards smaller aneurysms and broader indications, including ruptured aneurysms. The oversizing strategy also became the standard of practice for WEB deployment in our institution., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Laurent Spelle is a consultant for Microvention, Balt, Phenox, Stryker, Medtronic; PI for CLARYS; grant or contract from Philips with institution. Jacques Moret is a consultant for Microvention. Jildaz Caroff received payment for lectures for Medtronic., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomies (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) related to calcified cerebral embolus (CCE) have been reported, through small case series, being associated with low reperfusion rate and worse outcome, compared to regular MT. The purpose of the MASC (Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Related to Calcified Cerebral Embolus) study was to evaluate the incidence of CCEs treated by MT and the effectiveness of MT in this indication., Methods: The MASC study is a retrospective multicentric (n = 37) national study gathering the cases of adult patients who underwent MT for acute ischemic stroke with LVO related to a CCE in France from January 2015 to November 2019. Reperfusion rate (mTICI ≥ 2B), complication rate and 90-day mRS were systematically collected. We then conducted a systematic review by searching for articles in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar from January 2015 to March 2020. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate clinical outcome at 90 days, reperfusion rate and complications., Results: We gathered data from 35 patients. Reperfusion was obtained in 57% of the cases. Good clinical outcome was observed in 28% of the patients. The meta-analysis retrieved 136 patients. Reperfusion and good clinical outcome were obtained in 50% and 29% of the cases, respectively., Conclusion: The MASC study found worse angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to regular thrombectomies. Individual patient-based meta-analysis including the MASC findings shows a 50% reperfusion rate and a 29% of good clinical outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Pr F. Clarençon is consultant for Medtronic, Guerbet, Balt Extrusion, Penumbra, Stryker (paid lectures), Artedrone (advisory board), Biomodex (consultant) and Microvention (core lab). Dr N. Sourour is consultant for Medtronic, Balt Extrusion, Microvention Dr F. Eugene is consultant for Biomodex SA Pr. JC. Gentric is consultant pour Medtronic, Stryker, Balt, Penumbra (paid lectures) /Advisory Board and stock options: Intradys Pr A. Biondi is consultant for Balt Extrusion, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Phenox, Stryker Neurovascular, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Conventional histological analyses are the gold standard for the study of aneurysms and vascular pathologies in pre-clinical research. Over the past decade, in vivo and ex vivo imaging using multiphoton microscopy have emerged as powerful pre-clinical tools for detailed tissue analyses that can assess morphology, the extracellular matrix (ECM), cell density and vascularisation. Multiphoton microscopy allows for deeper tissue penetration with minor phototoxicity., Objective: The present study aimed to demonstrate the current status of multimodality imaging, including multiphoton microscopy, for detailed analyses of neo-endothelialisation and ECM evolution after flow-diverter stent (FDS) treatment in an experimental rabbit model of aneurysms., Methods: Multiphoton microscopy tools for assessing autofluorescence and second harmonic generation (SHG) signals from biological tissues were used to evaluate the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in an animal model of aneurysms (pig, rabbit). Results from multiphoton microscopy were compared to those from standard histology, electronic and bright field microscopy., Conclusions: The present study describes novel evaluation modes based on multiphoton microscopy for visualising tissue morphology (e.g., collagen, elastin, and cells) to qualify and quantify the extent of neo-intimal formation of covered arteries and device integration into the arterial wall using a rabbit model of intracranial aneurysms treated with FDS., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: To compare outcomes of minor stroke patients with intracranial vessel occlusions (IVO) underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus those treated with intravenous thrombolysis alone (IVT)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed two large prospective stroke databases from two European centers searching for patients admitted with minor stroke (i.e. NIHSS Score░≤░5), baseline mRS░=░0 and occlusion of the M1-M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Groups receiving (A) IVT alone and (B) MT+/-IVT were compared. Primary outcome measures were MT safety, successful recanalization rate (mTICI 2b-3) and NIHSS shift (discharge NIHSS minus admission NIHSS); secondary outcomes included discharge rates and excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at 3 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed., Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in Group B (19░MT alone; 13 MT░+░IVT) and 24 in Group A. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) was obtained in 100% of cases in Group B vs 38% in Group A. Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation rate did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis reported MT as the only predictor of early (<░12░h) favorable NIHSS shift and lower NIHSS at discharge. Moreover, discharge at home and excellent outcome at 3-month follow-up were statistically associated with MT., Conclusions: MT in patients with minor strokes and intracranial vessel occlusion (IVO) is safe and can determine a rapid improvement of NIHSS Score. MT seems also associated with a higher rate of patients discharged at home after hospitalization and better clinical outcome at 3-month follow-up. Larger randomized trials are warranted to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)