1. Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock
- Author
-
Didier Chochrad, C Madl, Jacques Devriendt, Daniel De Backer, Cesar Aldecoa, Jean Louis Vincent, Alexandre Brasseur, Philippe Gottignies, Patrick Biston, and Pierre Defrance
- Subjects
business.industry ,Septic shock ,Cardiogenic shock ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Norepinephrine (medication) ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Epinephrine ,chemistry ,Dopamine ,Anesthesia ,Shock (circulatory) ,Catecholamine ,medicine ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Neurotransmitter ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BACKGROUND Both dopamine and norepinephrine are recommended as first-line vasopressor agents in the treatment of shock. There is a continuing controversy about whether one agent is superior to the other. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with shock to receive either dopamine or norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor therapy to restore and maintain blood pressure. When blood pressure could not be maintained with a dose of 20 μg per kilogram of body weight per minute for dopamine or a dose of 0.19 μg per kilogram per minute for norepinephrine, open-label norepinephrine, epinephrine, or vasopressin could be added. The primary outcome was the rate of death at 28 days after randomization; secondary end points included the number of days without need for organ support and the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS The trial included 1679 patients, of whom 858 were assigned to dopamine and 821 to norepinephrine. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death at 28 days (52.5% in the dopamine group and 48.5% in the norepinephrine group; odds ratio with dopamine, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.42; P = 0.10). However, there were more arrhythmic events among the patients treated with dopamine than among those treated with norepinephrine (207 events [24.1%] vs. 102 events [12.4%], P
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF