Search

Objective: To investigate by means of a randomized clinical trial the safety of no drain in the pelvic cavity after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Materials and Methods: From May to December 2016, 112 consecutive patients who underwent RARP with or without ePLND were prospectively randomized into a control group (CG) and study group (SG). In the CG, a drain was placed in the pelvic cavity at the end of surgery and removed after 24 hours. The trial was designed to assess noninferiority. The primary endpoint was evaluated as complication rates graded by the Clavien-Dindo score (CDS). Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay (LOHS) and hospital readmission (RAD). Results and Limitations: At final analysis, 56 patients were in the CG and 54 belonged to the SG. The groups were homogenous for all preoperative and perioperative variables and did not show any difference in CDS complication rates (28.9% in the CG and 20.4% in the SG; p  = 0.254), LOHS (on average 4 days in each group; p  = 0.689), and RAD rates (3.6% in the CG and 3.7% in the SG; p  = 0.970). Conclusions: In a modern cohort of patients who underwent RARP with or without ePLND, a single-center randomized controlled trial showed that no-drain policy is equivalent to drain after RARP in terms of CDS complication rate, LOHS, and RAD rate. The option of placing a postoperative drain for the first 24 hours could be considered in cases of difficult urethrovesical anastomosis with uncertain watertightness.

Objective: To determinate benefits of the combination of local anesthetic wounds infiltration and ultrasound transversus abdominal plane (US-TAP) block with ropivacaine on postoperative pain, early recovery, and hospital stay in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)., Methods: The study is double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Our hypothesis was that the combination of wound infiltration and US-TAP block with ropivacaine would decrease immediate postoperative pain and opioids use. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain and opioids demand during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were nausea/vomiting rate, stool passing time, use of prokinetics, length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-days readmission to the hospital for pain or other US-TAP block-related complications., Results: A total of 100 patients who underwent RARP were eligible for the analysis; 57 received the US-TAP block with 20 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine (US-TAP block group) and 43 did not receive US-TAP block (no-US-TAP group). All the patients received the local wound anesthetic infiltration with 20 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine. US-TAP block group showed a decreased mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) within 12 hours after surgery (1.6 vs 2.6; p = 0.02) and mean NRS (1.8 vs 2.7; p = 0.04) with lesser number of patients who used opioid (3.5% vs 18.6%; p = 0.01) during the first 24 hours. Moreover, we found a shorter mean LOS (4.27 vs 4.72, days; p = 0.04) with a lower requirement of prokinetics administration during the hospital stay (21% vs 72%; p < 0.001). No US-TAP block-related complications were reported., Conclusion: Combination of anesthetic wound infiltration and US-TAP block with ropivacaine as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen can be safely offered to patients undergoing RARP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. It improves the immediate postoperative pain control, reducing opioids administration and is associated to a decreased use of prokinetics and shorter hospital stay.