Search

Background: Advancement in surgery has shifted numerous procedures to a same-day discharge (SDD) setting. In this study, we evaluated factors related to SDD after robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained hernia databank was performed. Patients who underwent rTAR for incisional hernias were assigned to either the SDD group (length of stay [LOS] <1) or the inpatient group (LOS ≥1 day). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were compared. Predictors of SDD were explored through a logistic regression, and a mediation analysis was performed to assess their effect on the LOS. Results: Out of the 167 patients included, 53 patients were discharged the same day. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of coronary artery disease, and wound infection were significantly higher in the inpatient group. Overall, median LOS was 1 (0-2). Postoperative complications did not differ between SDD and inpatient groups except for Clavien-Dindo Grade-II (1 versus 14, respectively; P = .039). Thirty-day readmission rates were comparable (P = .229). A binary logistic regression to predict factors associated with SDD rTAR showed statistical significance in age, operative time, mesh area, and history of wound infection. Mediation analysis showed that mesh size indirectly affected the LOS through the operative time (a = 0.54; b = 0.46; P < .001). An age >46-year-old, an operative time beyond 217 minutes, and a mesh size >475 cm2 increased the probability of an inpatient stay (area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.69, 0.81, and 0.82, respectively). Conclusion: The pre- and intraoperative factors associated with SDD rTAR were age, history of wound infection, operative time, and mesh area. Further studies are needed to investigate the appropriateness of discharge decisions while balancing patients' benefits, resource utilization, and costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This is the first study to investigate clinical outcomes after robotic emergent inguinal hernia repair (rEIHR). Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed from patients who underwent rEIHR from 2013 to 2020. Any patients who underwent concomitant nonabdominal wall procedures were excluded. Complications were assessed with the Clavien-Dindo (CD) and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) scoring systems. Results: Out of 616 patients who underwent inguinal herniorrhaphy throughout the study period, 23 rEIHRs were identified among 19 patients. The median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score was 6, and the average skin-to-skin time was 75.9 minutes. The average length of stay (LOS) was 1.4 days. During the mean follow-up period of 31.7 months, a total of three complications (CD-grades I, II, and IVa) in two patients were observed. The median CCI score was 0 (max = 43.3). Conclusion: rEIHR is a feasible option for surgeons to utilize, with a short LOS and low complication rate, given the sufficient experience and support as well as the appropriate patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Robotic Rives-Stoppa ventral hernia repair (rRS-VHR) is a minimally invasive technique that incorporates extraperitoneal mesh placement, using either transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal access. An understanding of its learning curve and technical challenges may guide and encourage its adoption. We aim at evaluating the rRS-VHR learning curve based on operative times while accounting for adverse outcomes. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rRS repair for centrally located ventral and incisional hernias. A single surgeon operative time-based cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis learning curve was created, and a composite outcome was used for risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM). Results: Eighty-one patients undergoing rRS-VHR were included. A learning curve was created by using skin-to-skin times. Accordingly, patients were grouped into three phases. The mean skin-to-skin time was 72.2 minutes, and there was a significant decrease in skin-to-skin times throughout the learning curve (Phase-I: 86.4 minutes versus Phase-III: 63.8 minutes; P = .001), with a gradual decrease after 29 cases. Eleven patients experienced adverse composite outcomes, which were used to create a RA-CUSUM graph. Results showed the highest adverse outcome rates in Phase-II, with a gradual decrease in risk-adjusted operative times after 51 cases. Conclusions: Consistently decreasing operative times and adverse outcome rates in rRS-VHR was observed after the completion of 29 and 51 cases, respectively. Future studies that provide group learning curves for this procedure can deliver more generalizable results in terms of its performance rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Minimally invasive abdominal wall reconstruction, utilizing transversus abdominis release (TAR), has been described and shown to be beneficial for ventral hernia repair (VHR). Limited literature is available surrounding the hybrid robotic TAR (h-rTAR) approach, which combines robotic dissection and component separation with open fascial defect closure and mesh deployment. In this study, we describe our h-rTAR technique and present our center's postoperative and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: h-rTAR VHRs performed between 2013 and 2018 were examined. The h-rTAR technique was described. Patient characteristics and operative variables were analyzed. Perioperative results were presented according to European Hernia Society (EHS) classifications. Pre- and post-operative hernia-specific quality-of-life (QoL) assessments were conducted. Results: Twenty patients who underwent an h-rTAR were included in this study. All hernias were incisional. A bilateral TAR needed in 90% of patients. The average hospital stay was 1.8 days. Two patients experienced medical complications and 5 patients experienced surgical site events. None of the patients experienced a hernia recurrence throughout a mean postoperative follow-up period of 319 days. PROs showed improvement in all domains, especially cosmetic. Conclusion: The h-rTAR technique combines the benefits of robotic and open techniques when used for large incisional VHR with improvement in patient-reported QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]