Search

Background: Several animal studies suggested that the angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor subtype mediates vasodilation, yet the results in human arteries are less well described and more inconsistent. Therefore, we evaluated the role of the AT2 receptor stimulation on the vasotonus of human internal mammary arteries., Methods: Internal mammary arteries were obtained from 50 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. The expression of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor and AT2 receptor mRNA was determined by using real-time polymerase chain reaction. In addition, angiotensin II and CGP42112A concentration-response curves (concentration range: 10(-10) M to 10(-6) M) were constructed in absence or presence of candesartan (10(-5) M) and/or the AT2 receptor-antagonist PD-123319 (10(-6) M) and/or the alpha receptor antagonist phentolamine., Results: Both AT1 and AT2 receptor protein and mRNA were detected, and higher AT2 receptor mRNA expression levels were associated with increased contractile response to angiotensin II. Angiotensin II caused vasoconstriction up to 41.1 +/- 6.5% of the maximal response to phenylephrine, and PD123319 significantly reduced this response (28.6 +/- 9.6%, P < 0.001). Candesartan completely blocked the angiotensin II-mediated response (1.4 +/- 3.1%, P < 0.001 versus control), and additional blockade of the AT2 receptor with PD123319 did not change this effect (1.8 +/- 5.1%). Phentolamine (10(-5) M) caused attenuation and rightward shift of the angiotensin II concentration response curves. The AT2 receptor agonist CGP42112A did not induce a significant response., Conclusion: Although AT2 receptor mRNA is present in human internal mammary arteries, AT2 receptor stimulation does not mediate vasodilation in these arteries.

Planar gated blood-pool imaging (GBPI) is a standard method for non-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. Gated blood-pool single photon emission computed tomographic (GBPS) data acquisition can be accomplished in the same time as GBPI, with the benefit of enabling visualization of all cardiac chambers simultaneously. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the degree to which automated and manual LVEF calculations agree with one another and with conventional GBPI LVEF measurements. GBPI studies were performed in 22 consecutive, unselected patients, followed by GBPS data acquisition. GBPS left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) calculations were performed by available software (NuSMUGA, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) automatically and manually, using all LV gated short axis slices. Automatic LVEF assessed by GBPS correlated well with conventional planar GBPI (r = 0.88, P < 0.001). Mean planar GBPI LVEF was 50% +/- 12%, and mean GBPS automatic LVEF was significantly lower at 45% + 14% (P = 0.001), with a mean difference of 6% +/- 5%. Manual GBPS LVEF also correlated well with conventional planar GBPI (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001). Mean LVEF measurement by manual GBPS versus GBPI was significantly higher at 59% +/- 13%, with a mean difference of 10% +/- 6% (P < 0.001). Manual GBPS LVEF values were also significantly higher than automatically determined GBPS LVEF values (P < 0.001). It is concluded that LVEF values assessed by NuSMUGA GBPS software were reproducible, and automatic and manual values correlated well with conventional GBPI values. However, both automatic and manual GBPS calculations were significantly different from one another and from GBPI values, so that GBPI and NuSMUGA calculations cannot be considered to be equivalent.

Platelet deposition and aggregation are the major determinants of acute thrombosis in coronary stents. We aimed to compare the antiplatelet efficacy of different treatments--glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and conventional antiaggregants--in an experimental model for stenting. Blood samples were obtained from patients with coronary artery disease (n = 15) and healthy volunteers (n = 8) and incubated either with eptifibatide (2.0 microg/ml), abciximab (3.0 microg/ml), indomethacin (15 microg/ml), or saline. Platelet adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation in whole blood was assessed for all groups. Blood was also tested in an experimental circulation model containing metallic probes, on which platelet deposition in shear flow conditions was assessed by means of fluorescent-labeled platelet-specific (anti-GpIIIa and Ib) antibodies. Eptifibatide and abciximab, in comparison with indomethacin and no treatment, significantly reduced platelet aggregation (0, 0, 4, and 3 arbitrary units [AU], respectively; p < 0.001), anti-GpIIIa (2.25, 1.83, 11.24, and 13.42 counts per second [cps]/mg, respectively; p < 0.001), and anti-GpIb binding (0.61, 0.61, 1.00, and 1.83 cps/mg, respectively; p < 0.001). Anti-GpIIIa and anti-GpIb binding were significantly correlated (R = 0.36; p < 0.01). Patients showed a higher anti-GpIIIa, but not anti-GpIb binding, than controls (8.43 versus 3.33 cps/mg; p < 0.01), irrespective of treatment. In conclusion, eptifibatide and abciximab show equivalent in vitro antiplatelet efficacy, superior to that of indomethacin. Given the occurrence of GpIIb/IIIa platelet overexpression in the course of coronary artery disease, an extended use of GpIIb/IIIa inhibitors may be proposed to prevent acute thrombosis during routine coronary stenting.

Dopaminergic agonists remain of interest in the treatment of heart failure; however, concomitant stimulation of alpha- and beta-receptors should be avoided. This study evaluates the dopaminergic and adrenergic (vasodilating) properties of Z1046, epinine (the active metabolite of ibopamine), and dopamine. Isotonic contraction experiments were performed on human internal mammary artery rings in vitro. alpha1-Antagonistic effects of Z1046 were demonstrated by performing cumulative dose-response curves with the selective alpha1-agonist phenylephrine in the presence of Z1046. Furthermore, both alpha1- and dopamine-mediated receptor effects of Z1046, epinine, and dopamine were studied by performing cumulative dose-response relations both at baseline and in precontracted artery rings both with and without the D1-like antagonist SCH23390. In contrast to both epinine and dopamine, Z1046 is devoid of alpha1-receptor-mediated contraction. Furthermore, Z1046, epinine, and dopamine induced direct dopamine receptor-mediated vasodilation when interfering alpha1 effects were blocked. In contrast to epinine and dopamine, Z1046 is devoid of vasoconstricting properties at higher dosages. Because of its D1-like agonistic and alpha1-antagonistic properties, Z1046 is an effective vasodilator in the whole dosage range. Because of its total receptor profile, Z1046 appears to be more favorable for treatment of heart failure than is ibopamine.

In the present review, we discuss the role of clinical dosing of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the treatment of left ventricular dysfunction. Although the precise mechanism of action of ACE inhibitors is still unresolved, the clinical efficacy of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of left ventricular dysfunction is well established. However, it is unclear whether the doses used in clinical trials translate directly into daily practice. Several reasons may cause differences between clinical practice and controlled trials: (1) clinical trials used higher doses than in normal practice; (2) some patients may be relatively 'resistant' to ACE inhibition; and/or (3) ACE activity increases during ACE inhibitor therapy and may provide escape mechanisms when the drug regimen is not strictly adhered to. Therefore, it is of interest that recent trials suggest that only the higher doses of ACE inhibition are clinically efficacious. In conclusion, it is suggested that optimal benefit from treatment with an ACE inhibitor in patients with left ventricular dysfunction requires sufficient and frequent dosing of the ACE inhibitor, e.g., enalapril 10 mg twice daily or captopril 25 mg three times daily.

Recently, different beta-blockers have been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF), but the importance of their ancillary properties is not clear. Epanolol is a selective beta1-blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, which has been shown useful in angina pectoris, but its value in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and CHF is unknown. We examined the effects of epanolol in patients with LV dysfunction (n = 8; mean LV ejection fraction, 0.33 +/- 0.08) and compared them with patients with normal LV function (n = 8; mean LV ejection fraction, 0.52 +/- 0.04). Measurement of invasive hemodynamics and neurohormones was performed at rest and during myocardial ischemia, which was induced by atrial pacing. All measurements were performed before and after epanolol. Before epanolol, pacing-induced ischemia led to a similar increase in norepinephrine and coronary sinus blood flow in both groups. After epanolol, the increase in neurohormones was more pronounced in the group with LV dysfunction (norepinephrine, 1,130 +/- 164 pg/ml for patients with LV dysfunction vs. 637 +/- 41 pg/ml for normal subjects; p < 0.05). A similar effect was observed for angiotensin II. Further, in the LV-dysfunction group, coronary sinus blood flow increased less, and coronary vascular resistance decreased less (both values, p < 0.05). Despite the fact that the increase in double product was decreased to a similar extent in both groups, ischemia was reduced only in normal LV function (p < 0.05). In ischemic LV dysfunction, neurohumoral activation after epanolol may impair adequate coronary flow response, and this may limit its antiischemic properties. Because of the small size of the study, no definitive inference on the clinical benefit of epanolol in patients with ischemic LV function can be made from this study.

There is convincing evidence that (prolonged) episodes of myocardial ischemia lead to impairment of left ventricular (LV) function and ultimately to chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), but whether the opposite is also true has not been well established. We studied this issue in two groups of CHF patients with positron emission tomography (PET) by using [13N]ammonia (13NH3) as a tracer. In the first protocol we compared 12 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (who have normal coronary arteries) with 12 healthy controls. In the second protocol we studied a group of 24 patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD). In this protocol, we compared patients with normal LV function to those with LV dysfunction and CHF. In patients with cardiomyopathy, myocardial blood flow at rest was normal but flow reserve (after dipyridamole infusion) was significantly impaired (1.7 +/- 0.08) compared with normal subjects (2.7 +/- 0.04; p <0.05). Furthermore, by examining [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) uptake, a perfusion-metabolism mismatch was observed in 24 +/- 6% of the myocardium in patients with cardiomyopathy as opposed to 0% of normals (p <0.05). In patients with CAD, myocardial blood flow reserve (measured in non-stenotic arteries to non-infarcted area) was impaired in CHF patients (1.7 +/- 0.06) compared to those with normal LV function (2.3 +/- 0.05; p <0.05). In both groups of CHF patients, the impairment of blood flow reserve showed a significant correlation with the severity of CHF. In conclusion, myocardial blood flow reserve is impaired in patients with CHF in proportion to the degree of CHF. Metabolic studies with 18FDG further show that, in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and CHF, flow-metabolism mismatch is present in a substantial part of the myocardium, suggesting a pathogenetic role for ischemia.

Left ventricular (LV) dilatation after myocardial infarction (MI) is a major predictor of prognosis and identifies which patients will develop heart failure. Left ventricular dilatation or remodeling starts immediately after MI and progresses in the chronic phase of heart failure. Factors influencing remodeling, such as infarct size and neurohumoral activation, including the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin system, are discussed. Remodeling can be affected by reduction of infarct size and inhibition of neurohumoral activation. The effect of thrombolysis, beta-blockade, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in the acute phase after MI and in the chronic phase of heart failure on remodeling are discussed. On the basis of beneficial effects of ACE inhibition and beta-blockade in acute MI and in chronic heart failure, a treatment strategy is proposed in which both ACE inhibition and beta-blockade are started early after MI. Depending on infarct size and ventricular function, continued treatment in the chronic phase of heart failure must be considered.

In chronic heart failure, the role of endothelial dysfunction is not yet well established. As calcium metabolism plays an important role in the endothelium, it might be suggested that calcium channel blockers influence endothelial function. Although calcium channel blockers are generally contraindicated in chronic heart failure, because they are believed to stimulate neurohumoral mechanisms and to exert negative inotropic effects, recently it has been suggested that amlodipine might have a favorable affect on mortality in patients with heart failure. The mechanism of amlodipine that contributes to this beneficial effect is not known. Therefore we investigated whether 10 weeks of amlodipine treatment could influence endothelial function in rats with congestive heart failure induced by myocardial infarction. The main finding of our study was that amlodipine, when administered for 10 weeks to rats after a myocardial infarction had been induced, had no significant effects on in vitro and in vivo hemodynamics or neurohormones. The effect of amlodipine on endothelium-intact, norepinephrine-precontracted aortic rings appears to differ from the placebo treatment with respect to the endothelium-dependent relaxation, whereas no differences are seen in endothelium-independent relaxation. We conclude that our data do not support a beneficial role of amlodipine on endothelial function in chronic heart failure.

To study the hemodynamic and renal effects of the orally (p. o.) active dopamine (DA) agonist ibopamine, we examined 10 patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure (CHF), who were stable while treated with digoxin and diuretics. All patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-III; their mean age was 63 years (range 51-79 years), and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 28% (range 18-36%). The protocol consisted of a control study-day with measurements of renal characteristics including glomerular filtration rate (GFR), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), and filtration fraction (FF). One week later, systemic and renal hemodynamics were measured simultaneously before and after patients received one 100-mg tablet of ibopamine. Ibopamine caused a slight but significant increase in both ERPF (from 288 +/- 32 ml/min/1.73 m2 at baseline to 316 +/- 32 ml/min/1.73 m2 after ibopamine) and GFR (from 77 +/- 8 to 85 +/- 8 ml/min/1.73 m2; both p < 0.05); FF was not affected (mean value 0.26 +/- 0.02). Sodium excretion was not influenced by ibopamine, but diuresis increased significantly. Cardiac output (CO) increased significantly (from 4.0 +/- 0.4 L/min at baseline to a maximum of 5.0 L/min after ibopamine, p < 0.05), mainly due to decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were unchanged throughout the studies. The percentage of contribution of CO to renal blood flow (RBF) was not significantly affected by ibopamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spirapril is a new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with a long duration of action. To determine whether duration of inhibition of serum ACE activity may affect regional blood flow (RBF), we compared spirapril with captopril, an ACE inhibitor with a short duration of action. Both the short- and long-term effects were studied in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure (CHF). Calf, renal, and hepatic BF measurements were performed in the morning before intake of the study medication; 24 h after the previous dose of spirapril (n = 9 patients) and 12 h after the previous dose of captopril (n = 9 patients). Serum ACE activity after 1, 6, and 12 weeks was significantly reduced in patients receiving spirapril, but not in those receiving captopril. The decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was more pronounced in the spirapril group. Calf BF showed a slight but not significant increase in both spirapril- and captopril-treated patients. Effective renal BF increased significantly only in patients treated with spirapril. Although filtration fraction (FF) tended to decrease in the spirapril group, the decrease was significant only in the captopril group. No changes were observed in hepatic BF. Cerebral BF (CBF) measurements were performed after intake of the first dose of study medication and after 12 weeks, immediately after drug intake. Significant reduction in MAP in the two treatment groups both after the first dose and after 12 weeks did not affect CBF. Despite a significantly prolonged decrease in MAP and serum ACE activity in spirapril-treated patients, no marked differences in RBF were noted between the two ACE inhibitors.

To elucidate the effect of isradipine and nifedipine on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function, each drug was given intravenously (i.v.) in equihypotensive doses to 10 patients accepted for coronary arteriography for stable angina pectoris. All 20 patients had LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of < 40% owing to previous myocardial infarction (MI). Systolic and diastolic function was assessed by standard hemodynamic parameters and pressure-volume relations measured by nuclear stethoscope. All measurements were taken at rest and during ischemia caused by right atrial pacing. Both systolic and diastolic parameters improved equally with isradipine and nifedipine. LVEF and cardiac output (CO) increased owing to peripheral vasodilatation. A decrease in P/Vmax, indicating a negative inotropic effect, was noted in patients at rest with both medications, but not during pacing-induced ischemia. With either medication, the time constant of relaxation and the end-diastolic elasticity constant decreased during pacing, indicating improvement in diastolic function, probably owing to relief of myocardial ischemia.