Search

Background: There is currently minimal evidence that preoperative malnutrition increases surgical site infection (SSI) risk in children with cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Growth charts specifically for patients with CP have been created to aid in the clinical interpretation of body mass index (BMI) as a marker of nutritional status, but to our knowledge these charts have never been used to risk stratify patients before orthopaedic surgery. We hypothesize that patients with CP who have BMI-for-age below the 10th percentile (BMI≤10) on CP-specific growth charts are at increased risk of surgical site infection following spinal deformity surgery compared with patients with BMI-for-age above the 10th percentile (BMI>10)., Methods: Single-center, retrospective review comparing the rate of SSI in patients with CP stratified by BMI-for-age percentiles on CP-specific growth charts who underwent spinal deformity surgery. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and Pearson χ tests were used to analyze the association of the measured nutritional indicators with SSI., Results: In total, 65 patients, who underwent 74 procedures, had complete follow-up data and were included in this analysis. Ten patients (15.4%) were GMFCS I-III and 55 (84.6%) were GMFCS IV-V; 39 (60%) were orally fed and 26 (40%) were tube-fed. The rate of SSI in this patient population was 13.5% with 10 SSIs reported within 90 days of surgery. There was a significant association between patients with a BMI below the 10th percentile on GMFCS-stratified growth charts and the development of SSI (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 2.4-75.4; P=0.005). All SSIs occurred in patients that were GMFCS IV-V. There was no association between height, weight, feeding method, or pelvic instrumentation and development of SSI., Conclusions: CP-specific growth charts are useful tools for identifying patients at increased risk for SSI following spinal instrumentation procedures, whereas standard CDC growth charts are much less sensitive. There is a strong association between preoperative BMI percentile on GMFCS-stratified growth charts and SSI following spinal deformity surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III-Retrospective Study.

Purpose of Review: An overview of best evidence-based current practice in the use of prophylactic antibiotics in elective oncological head and neck surgery is presented., Recent Findings: Patients undergoing head and neck oncological surgery are at great risk of developing complications following surgery. The incidence of wound infection has been reported to be as high as 87%, often with devastating effects. Prophylactic antibiotics have helped to reduce significantly the risk of infection; however, clinicians managing these patients should also have a thorough understanding of the risk factors leading to postoperative infections and should apply the most basic surgical principles at all times, to minimize infection rates., Summary: Prophylactic antibiotics usage in clean-contaminated major oncological head and neck surgery is mandatory to reduce the risk of infection. In clean major oncological head and neck surgery their use is also advisable but there is no evidence that in clean surgery for benign disease it offers any advantage. Short antibiotic regimes of four doses per 24 h are as effective as prolonged courses regardless of the complexity of the procedure. A combination of antibiotic agents covering aerobic, anaerobic and Gram-negative bacteria is superior to single agents. High-risk patients should be also given short regimes, as there is no evidence that prolonged courses are of more benefit in these patients. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection can have devastating consequences for patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Protocols of prevention and treatment should be in place in all institutions treating patients with head and neck cancer. Close collaboration between surgical, microbiology and infection-control teams is essential.

Background: Hospital discharge diagnoses, coded by use of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), increasingly determine reimbursement and support quality monitoring. Prior studies of coding validity have investigated whether coding guidelines were met, not whether the clinical condition was actually present., Objective: To determine whether clinical evidence in medical records confirms selected ICD-9-CM discharge diagnoses coded by hospitals., Research Design and Subjects: Retrospective record review of 485 randomly sampled 1994 hospitalizations of elderly Medicare beneficiaries in Califomia and Connecticut., Main Outcome Measure: Proportion of patients with specified ICD-9-CM codes representing potential complications who had clinical evidence confirming the coded condition., Results: Clinical evidence supported most postoperative acute myocardial infarction diagnoses, but fewer than 60% of other diagnoses had confirmatory clinical evidence by explicit clinical criteria; 30% of medical and 19% of surgical patients lacked objective confirmatory evidence in the medical record. Across 11 surgical and 2 medical complications, objective clinical criteria or physicians' notes supported the coded diagnosis in >90% of patients for 2 complications, 80% to 90% of patients for 4 complications, 70% to <80% of patients for 5 complications, and <70% for 2 complications. For some complications (postoperative pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia, and hemorrhage or hematoma), a large fraction of patients had only a physician's note reporting the complication., Conclusions: Our findings raise questions about whether the clinical conditions represented by ICD-9-CM codes used by the Complications Screening Program were in fact always present. These findings highlight concerns about the clinical validity of using ICD-9-CM codes for quality monitoring.

A multicenter study was undertaken to analyze postoperative wound infections after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion. The infection rate of these procedures has been documented in multiple reports. From these results, a classification scheme was developed that can guide therapy and determine the populations at risk. The patients were categorized according to two parameters, the first being the severity or type of infection, and the second being the host response or physiologic classification of the patient. This classification scheme is based on the clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis developed by Cierny. The severity of infection is divided into three groups. Group 1 is a single-organism infection, either superficial or deep. Group 2 is a multiple-organism, deep infection. Group 3 is multiple organisms with myonecrosis. The host response, likewise, is divided into three classes. Class A is a host with normal systemic defenses, metabolic capabilities, and vascularity. Class B patients demonstrate local or multiple systemic diseases, including cigarette smoking. Class C requires an immunocompromised or severely malnourished host. Our data have demonstrated that single organisms, Group 1, generally can be dealt with by single irrigation and debridement, and closure over suction drainage tubes without the use of an inflow-irrigation system. The Group 2 patients, with multiple organisms and deep infection, required an average of three irrigation debridements. They have a higher percentage of successful closures with closed inflow-outflow suction irrigation systems when compared to simple suction drainage systems without constant inflow irrigation. Multiple-organism infections with myonecrosis, Group 3, are exceedingly difficult to manage, and portend a poor outcome. Patients without normal host defenses, Classes B and C, are at high risk for developing postoperative wound infection. Specifically, this study demonstrated that cigarette smoking may be a significant risk factor.