Search

Purpose: To identify donor and recipient factors, including eye bank tissue observations, predictive of operative complications in the Cornea Preservation Time Study., Methods: One thousand three hundred thirty study eyes undergoing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs dystrophy or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema were randomized to receive a donor cornea with preservation time (PT) of 0 to 7 days (N = 675) or 8 to 14 days (N = 655). Donor factors included demographics, prelamellar corneal and postlamellar lenticule dissection thickness, central endothelial cell density, and tissue processing time. Recipient factors included demographics, intraocular pressure, and glaucoma medications or surgery (trabeculectomy, laser trabeculoplasty). Eye bank observations included donor tissue folds, pleomorphism/polymegethism, and endothelial cell abnormalities. Possible tissue-related operative complications were recorded including difficult donor lenticule unfolding and positioning. Multivariable logistic regression with backward selection was used to identify statistically significant (P < 0.01) associations between factors and operative complications., Results: The only factor predictive of operative complications [58 (4.4%) of 1330 surgeries] was prelamellar dissection donor corneal thickness (P = 0.002). For every 50 μm of donor corneal thickness prior to lamellar dissection, operative complication odds increased by 40% (odds ratio [99% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.40 [1.06-1.83]) adjusting for PT and whether the epithelium was on or off. The estimated mean prelamellar dissection donor corneal thickness for PT 0 to 7 days was 537 μm (99% CI: 516 μm-558 μm) compared with 567 μm (99% CI: 546 μm-588 μm) for PT 8 to 14 days (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Thicker donor tissue (prelamellar dissection) is associated with operative complications and should be considered in tissue selection for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty lenticule preparation.

Purpose: To evaluate the utility, safety, and efficacy of a parallel or cloverleaf retention suture in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty that does not penetrate donor tissue and can be removed at the slit lamp for patients at high risk of graft detachment., Methods: Data were prospectively collected over 9 years from patients who received a retention suture. Indications for use of a retention suture included difficulty with postoperative positioning, abnormal intraocular anatomy including glaucoma tube shunts, trabeculectomies, anterior chamber intraocular lens implants, previous vitrectomy, aniridia, and aphakia, or history of previous graft detachment., Results: Of 128 surgeries, 12 (9.4%) required additional intervention for graft reattachment (rebubble). Overall, 120 grafts (93.8%) remained clear and attached either after surgery with a retention suture or after rebubble procedures. Mean endothelial cell density at 1 year was 1840 cells/mm, and mean endothelial cell density loss was 37.3%., Conclusions: A cloverleaf or parallel retention suture in conjunction with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty seems to reduce the risk of detachment in high-risk patients, while maintaining adequate cell density and graft clarity at 1 year.