Search

Study Design: An experimental study of fatiguing isometric trunk extension was conducted to investigate the spinal loading estimated from an electromyogram-assisted biomechanical model., Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity of the model outputs to two crucial assumptions: electromyogram-force relationship and method of gain estimation., Summary of Background Data: In the proposed electromyogram-assisted models of the trunk, the nature of the electromyogram-force relationship and the wide variation in reported muscle gains can result in a wide variation in estimates of spinal loading. Given the absence of any gold standard for validation of muscle forces, the delineation of confidence intervals for the estimated loads has become critical., Methods: Ten subjects performed a fatiguing isometric trunk extension while the net muscular torque output and trunk muscular activity were measured. An electromyogram-assisted model was used to estimate the torque output and spinal loading. Linear and nonlinear erector spinae electromyogram-force relationships and three methods for gain estimation were investigated: constant gain determined from an initial maximum extension exertion, constant gain based on the fatiguing exertion, and a time-varying gain from the fatigue test., Results: The predicted torque was not sensitive to the electromyogram-force relationship; the nonlinear model produced 10% lower estimates of peak spinal compression force and 14% higher estimates of peak anterior shear force. The gain determined from an initial calibration exertion underestimated the external torque and underpredicted the peak compression force by 20%, compared with gains calculated in the fatigue test., Conclusion: The nature of the electromyogram-force relationship and of the method for estimating the gain significantly affect the outcomes of an electromyogram-assisted model of spinal loading.

The evaluation of the effect of lifting belts on multijoint coordinated lifting performance has been limited. Thirteen subjects participated in two experiments: (a) fatiguing repetitive sagittal lifting and (b) asymmetric lifting. Both experiments were performed with and without the use of a common flexible lifting belt to determine the effect of belt use on the trunk and lower extremity motion and load sharing. During both tests, the use of the belt was observed to restrict the sagittal trunk range of motion and velocity, while the hip motion and velocity increased. Although one of the risk factors for acquisition of low back pain may be reduced while wearing the belt, the results also demonstrate a need for greater study of the consequences on the risk of injury to the other joints. More laboratory experiments and prospective epidemiological studies are needed before a conclusive recommendation could be made in favor of using the belt as a valid preventive measure.

A novel testing protocol was used to investigate changes in neuromuscular performance, muscle recruitment, and spinal loading as subjects became fatigued while performing an isometric endurance test of varying torque requirements. There was decreased accuracy in maintenance of a reference torque but no change in response time as subjects became fatigued. The study of trunk-muscle recruitment indicated significant increases in internal oblique and latissimus dorsi muscle activity. This change in recruitment led to changes in spinal loading despite a relatively constant torque output. The use of an electromyogram (EMG)-assisted model demonstrated that when subjects are expected to become fatigued during test performance, the assumption of a constant maximal stress capacity of the muscle may not be robust.

Spinal subdural hematoma is a rare condition with numerous etiologies. It is even more rare in the postoperative period and must be differentiated from the more common causes of postoperative pain and radiculopathy. We report a 36-year-old man presenting 6 weeks after surgery with incapacitating pain who was found to have a subdural but extraarachnoid fluid collection. We describe clinical presentation, radiological findings, etiology, and treatment. We conclude that, although rare, the spinal subdural hematoma should be considered in patients with postoperative pain. Prompt recognition and surgical evacuation are important for optimal recovery.