Search

Background: In high-cardiovascular-risk treated hypertensive patients, the incidence of cardiovascular events has been reported to relate to visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability. We investigated whether visit-to-visit BP variability is prognostically important in treated mildly to moderately hypertensive patients in whom treatment aims at avoiding events but also at preventing or delaying progression of organ damage., Methods and Results: We analyzed the pooled data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a randomized, double-blind 4-year trial of the effect of lacidipine or atenolol on echographic carotid intima-media thickness. Visit-to-visit BP variability was assessed by the coefficient of variation or the SD of the mean on-treatment systolic BP (SBP) obtained at 6- (clinic BP) and 12- (24 hours BP) month intervals, respectively (1521 and 1264 patients, respectively). In a multivariable linear regression model, mean on-treatment clinic or 24-hour SBP, but not SBP coefficient of variation or SD, was associated with end-of-treatment carotid intima-media thickness. Intima-media thickness increased progressively from the lowest to highest quartile of mean on-treatment clinic or 24-hour SBP (adjusted P for trend=0.046 and 0.048) but not along similar quartiles of SBP coefficient of variation or SD. In a multivariable logistic regression model, mean BP, but not variability, was associated with cardiovascular outcomes., Conclusions: In mildly to moderately hypertensive patients, carotid intima-media thickness and cardiovascular outcomes were related to the mean clinic or ambulatory SBP achieved by treatment but not to on-treatment visit-to-visit clinic or 24-hour BP variability. Thus, when BP is modestly elevated, inconsistency of BP control between visits plays a less important prognostic role than long-term average BP levels.

Objective: To see whether there is interaction between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) belonging to candidate genes for hypertension and job strain and its components (job demand and job control) in an accurately phenotyped Italian cohort (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni)., Methods: From the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni cohort, we sampled 924 employed men and women who had completed a modified version of the Karasek questionnaire and for whom deoxyribonucleic acid information was available. We selected 1,510 common tagging and putative functional SNPs in 92 candidate autosomal genes involved in sympathetic nervous system, oxidative stress, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and sodium balance. The interaction of each candidate SNP with the perceived job stress scores on ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressures was evaluated by adding product terms to a multiple regression linear model, adjusted for sex, age, total cholesterol, and body mass index., Results: Among all the SNPs tested, the interaction of SNP rs11210278 located on the endothelin 2 gene and job control was statistically significant after controlling for multiple testing, using false discovery rate (unadjusted p = .00000661; p adjusted for false discovery rate = .0085), indicating an inverse association with systolic blood pressure for the homozygous wild-type allele (C/C) and a positive association for the variant genotypes (C/T and T/T)., Conclusions: We show that the hypertensive response to job strain is present only in carriers of the rs11210278 wild-type genotype. The phenomenon is discussed in relationship to the controversial results of field studies on job strain and hypertension.

Objective: SunTech 247 is an oscillometric blood pressure (BP) monitor manufactured by SunTech Medical Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA. The aims of this study were (i) to determine its accuracy using the 1993 modified British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol, the 2002 International Protocol (IP) and the 2002/2003 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards, (ii) to compare the performance of BHS protocol and IP., Methods: Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were recorded to the nearest 2 mmHg and measured with the arm supported at heart level. For each participant, nine sequential same arm measurements were taken by two trained observers, comparing the device to standard mercury sphygmomanometers. Procedures and data analysis were carried out following protocols guidelines., Results: First, we recruited 33 participants required by the IP. Then, data collection continued to obtain 85 participants for the BHS protocol/AAMI standard. Readings differing by less than 5, 10 and 15 mmHg for SBP and DBP fulfilled IP recommendations. According to the BHS protocol, for the better observer, the percentage of test device readings differing from the mercury standard by 5, 10 and 15 mmHg or less were: 92.9, 100 and 100% for SBP and 94.9, 98.8 and 99.6% for DBP. The mean differences +/- standard deviation between the device and mercury sphygmomanometer readings were 1.7 +/- 3.1 mmHg for SBP and 1.1 +/- 3.2 mmHg for DBP, achieving AAMI requirements. Standard deviation of mean differences were 2.4 for SBP and 2.1 for DBP, following the IP, and 3.1 and 3.2, respectively, for BHS protocol. The variance of all 99 differences (total deviance), with 98 degree of freedom, was 585.6 for SBP and 444.1 for DBP. The 33 differences obtained from the mean differences for each participant (between-subject variance), with 32 degree of freedom, were 275.6 and 152.1, respectively. F test was 1.83 with P = 0.0191 for SBP, and 1.07 (P = 0.3936) for DBP., Conclusion: (i) The device achieved the requirements stated by the 2002 IP, fulfilled the standards stated by the AAMI, and on the basis of the standards indicated by the 1993 modified BHS protocol, can be classified as 'A' grade both for SBP and DBP. Therefore, SunTech 247 may be recommended for clinical use, (ii) IP and BHS protocol provide complementary features for device validation; the comparison of total deviance and between-subject variance confirms the estimates of IP authors for SBP.

Background: Baseline carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaques are considered predictors of cardiovascular events, but whether they maintain predictive value in treated hypertensive patients and whether time-related (or treatment-induced) IMT changes are additional predictors are unknown., Methods and Results: Analyses were performed of the data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA), a large, randomized, intervention trial in which 2334 hypertensive patients from 7 European countries were followed up under effective antihypertensive treatment for 3.75 years. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated progressively lower survival free of any type of outcome except stroke, with increasing baseline IMT quartiles or increasing IMT values, even after adjustment for major baseline risk factors. Incidence of any outcome except stroke also was related to baseline number of carotid plaques. However, when both baseline and on-treatment IMT values were entered in Cox proportional-hazards models, differences in IMT compared with baseline did not predict cardiovascular outcomes. Although on-treatment rather than baseline IMT values significantly entered some of the proportional-hazards models, baseline and on-treatment IMTs were highly correlated, and therefore these results are inconclusive., Conclusions: ELSA shows that carotid intima-media thickening and plaques are important added risks of cardiovascular outcomes in a treated hypertensive population independently of blood pressure and traditional risk factors. However, the analysis failed to show a predictive role of treatment-dependent IMT changes. These negative conclusions should be tempered by the limitations inherent in the smallness of these changes compared with the large individual differences in baseline IMTs.

Objective: Blood pressure (BP) 'Cardiette BP one' system (BP one) is an oscillometric ambulatory BP monitor manufactured in Italy in conformity to current regulations for medical devices. We decided to determine the accuracy of measures made with BP one, using the protocol of the British Hypertension Society published in 1990, and revised in 1993, for evaluating the accuracy of BP measurement devices., Methods: The evaluation included before-use calibration, in-use assessment, after-use calibration, and static device validation that involved 85 participants., Results: The mean difference between manual readings with sphygmomanometer and automatic ones with the device were -0.36+/-5.74 (mean+/-SD) for systolic values and 2.52+/-4.87 for diastolic values. On the basis of the percentages of measurements differing from the mercury sphygmomanometer standard by

Background: Studies in hypertensive patients suggest that ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is prognostically superior to office BP. Much less information is available in the general population, however. Obtaining this information was the purpose of the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study., Methods and Results: Office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory BP values were obtained in 2051 subjects between 25 and 74 years of age who were representative of the general population of Monza (Milan, Italy). Subjects were followed up for an average of 131 months, during which time cardiovascular and noncardiovascular fatal events were recorded (n=186). Office, home, and ambulatory BP values showed a significant exponential direct relationship with risk of cardiovascular or all-cause death. The goodness of fit of the relationship was greater for systolic than for diastolic BP and for night than for day BP, but its overall value was not better for home or ambulatory than for office BP. The slope of the relationship, however, was progressively greater from office to home and ambulatory BP. Home and night BP modestly improved the goodness of fit of the risk model when added to office BP., Conclusions: In the PAMELA population, risk of death increased more with a given increase in home or ambulatory than in office BP. The overall ability to predict death, however, was not greater for home and ambulatory than for office BP, although it was somewhat increased by the combination of office and outside-of-office values. Systolic BP was almost invariably superior to diastolic BP, and night BP was superior to day BP.