Search

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the effect of plate location and screw type for fixation of extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal comminution (Orthopaedic Trauma Association Type 23-A3.2)., Methods: Sixteen pairs of cadaver radii were randomized to four plating configurations: dorsal locking, dorsal nonlocking, volar locking, and volar nonlocking. A standard 1-cm dorsal wedge osteotomy was used. Cyclic axial loads were applied for 5000 cycles. Stiffness and fragment displacement were recorded at 500 cycle-intervals. Pre- and postcyclic loading radiographs were analyzed. An axial load to failure test followed and construct stiffness and failure strength recorded. Biomechanical data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (P < 0.05). Failure modes were descriptively interpreted., Results: Cyclic testing data revealed no difference between constructs at any interval. Within all construct groups, displacement that occurred did so within the first 500 cycles of testing. Pre- and postcyclic loading radiographic analysis showed no differences in construct deformation. Load to failure testing revealed no differences between groups, whereas volar constructs approached significance (P = 0.08) for increased failure strength. Dorsal constructs failed primarily by fragment subsidence and fragmentation, whereas volar constructs failed by plate bending., Conclusions: No difference in all measured biomechanical parameters supports equivalence between constructs and surgeon discretion in determining operative method. Minimal fragment displacement and construct deformation during physiological testing support previous data that early postoperative motion can be recommended. Fragment displacement that occurs does so in the early periods of motion.

Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation using human cadaveric cervical spines., Objective: Evaluate differences in biomechanical stability between typical lateral mass screw + rod constructs compared to transfacet screw fixation with and without rods., Summary of Background Data: Lateral mass screw + rod constructs have reported efficacious arthrodesis rates/quality but risk damaging the lateral neurovascular structures. Transfacet screw fixation has been studied in the lumbar spine, but little data exists regarding its potential utility in the cervical spine., Methods: Sixteen human cadaveric cervical spines were stripped of soft tissue leaving the occiput and ligamentous structures intact. Spines were randomized to lateral mass or transfacet groups (n = 8/group). Spines were prepared in typical surgical fashion and instrumented with the appropriate devices. In the case of the transfacet constructs, the occiput was left intact to simulate the potential surgical difficulty of screw insertion. The transfacet screw group was initially instrumented with rods. Once instrumented (C3-C6) for each group, spines were further dissected to isolate the instrumented levels. End vertebral bodies were rigidly fixed and constructs biomechanically tested in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion between +/-2 Nm. After testing for the transfacet screw + rod group, rods were removed and spines retested. All instrumentation was then removed and spines tested in their destabilized state as would occur with surgical preparation. Stiffness data were calculated for each test direction for all groups. Raw and normalized data were each compared across techniques with a 1-way ANOVA (P < 0.05)., Results: The transfacet screw groups (with and without rods) were found to have statistically similar biomechanical stability to lateral mass screw + rod constructs for each test direction., Conclusion: Transfacet screws (without rods) were found to have similar biomechanical stability compared to typical lateral mass screw + rod constructs. However, transfacet fixation eliminates the risk to the neurovascular structures and lowers the overall implant profile.

Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation using human cadaveric vertebrae., Objective: Evaluate the biomechanical differences in transverse plane vertebral body derotation maneuvers of thoracic pedicle screws in both medial and lateral directions., Summary of Background Data: Thoracic pedicle screws are thought to have better vertebral rotation control and better segmental scoliosis correction compared to hooks and wires. Little data exists regarding the biomechanical stability of pedicle screws when derotated in either medial or lateral directions., Methods: Vertebral bodies (T4-L5) from 12 cadavers were instrumented with appropriate length pedicle screws while measuring insertion torque. Each body was anchored for independent loading in medial or lateral directions. Each screw was rotated around a rod using a constant length lever arm (30.5 cm) rigidly attached to the screw head simulating the posterior vertebral derotation maneuver. Yield torques (Nm) were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (P < 0.05)., Results: Yield torques for both directions were significantly related to screw insertion torque (both P < 0.01). There were no statistical differences in yield torque between medial (12.0 +/- 4.9 Nm) or lateral (11.5 +/- 5.1 Nm) directions. There were no significant differences after normalization for insertion torque or screw length. Tests rotating the screw tip laterally demonstrated structural failure in the following percentages (anterolateral failure = 67%, posterior element failure = 33%, additional screw bending = 42%). Rotation medially demonstrated structural failures in the following percentages (canal penetration = 51%, posterior element failure = 49%, additional screw bending = 44%)., Conclusion: From these data, a surgeon performing a direct vertebral derotation using a 30 cm (12 in) lever would need to apply roughly 40 N (9 lbs) to causeanatomic failure. Adolescent patients would likely tolerate a greater force without bone failure given a greater bone density, yet, extreme caution is still recommended to prevent screw rotation either medially into the spinal canal or laterally into the chest.

Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical properties of both plate location (superior versus anterior-inferior) and plate type Small Fragment Contourable Dual Compression Plate (CDCP) versus 3.5 mm Universal Locking System Contourable Dual Compression Plate (Locked CDCP) in a synthetic midshaft transverse clavicle fracture model., Methods: Twenty-four pre-osteomized synthetic clavicles were repaired with either CDCP or locked CDCP technology 3.5 mm plates in either the superior or anterior-inferior position to form 4 groups of 6 clavicles. These were subsequently tested to evaluate torsional and axial construct stiffness, as well as bending load to failure, bending failure stiffness, and method of failure., Results: In axial compression, locked CDCP constructs were significantly more stiff than CDCP constructs (p < 0.001), but no statistically significant effect of plate location was observed. Torsional tests demonstrated a significant 2-way interaction favoring locked CDCP plates in the superior position and standard CDCP plates in the anterior-inferior position (p < 0.001). Bending failure testing revealed that the superior plate location had higher load to failure and bending failure stiffness than the anterior-inferior location (p < 0.0001). In addition, the superior locked CDCP plates demonstrated significantly greater bending failure stiffness than superior CDCP plates (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Biomechanically, repairing a midshaft clavicle fracture with a superior plate was more favorable compared to anterior-inferior plating in terms of both load to failure and bending failure stiffness. Furthermore, superior locked CDCP plates show improved bending failure stiffness over superior CDCP plates.

Background: Several different methods have been used to repair tibial eminence avulsion fractures. It is not clear which is the best stabilization method. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of tibial eminence avulsion fractures using suture, resorbable screw, resorbable nail, and metal screw techniques., Methods: Sixteen immature bovine knees were dissected leaving just the anterior cruciate ligament. A fracture was created using a curved osteotome, The knees were randomly stabilized with either 2 single-armed #2 Ethibond sutures, 3 bioabsorbable nails, a single resorbable screw, or a single metal screw. Femurs were tested with the knee flexed to 35 degrees to simulate anterior tibial translation. Tests involved loading between 5 N and 150 N for 200 cycles, then a tensile failure test at 0.5 mm/sec. Cyclic fragment deformation, initial fragment stiffness, and failure load were compared using a 1-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05)., Results: There were no significant mechanical differences across groups. The variability in performance was much greater for both the suture and resorbable screw repairs. Both sutures and resorbable screw constructs resulted in a deformation that was 1 mm greater than that of the resorbable nails or a metal screw., Conclusions: Increased fracture separation for sutures and resorbable screw groups indicates a potential loss in reduction during cyclic, physiologic loads. Each group could withstand up to 85 lb of tensile force before failure, but it is unlikely that this force would occur with incidental loads during the early rehabilitation period., Clinical Relevance: There was not a clear biomechanical advantage to performing any particular fixation method in this study. This suggests that the surgeon can use their clinical judgment and experience to determine the fixation technique.

Background: Previous data have shown that an equal number of threads on each side of the physis maximizes stability for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) fixation. The purpose of the current study was to determine if a fully threaded cancellous screw provides greater stability compared with a partially threaded screw in a porcine model., Methods: Twenty skeletally immature porcine femurs were sectioned, and a 30-degree angular wedge was resected from the femoral neck to simulate SCFE. Femora were randomly assigned to partially threaded (16 mm) or fully threaded screw groups (n = 10/group). Kirschner wires were inserted in a retrograde fashion to stabilize the proximal fragment. Each 7.3-mm-diameter screw was placed using fluoroscopic guidance to obtain 3 threads crossing the physis. Specimens were fixed in custom fixation rigs, and the epiphyseal fragment was loaded at 0.5 mm/s in a posterior-inferior direction to simulate slip progression. Data for displacement (in millimeters) and force (in newtons) were collected for the entire test. Forces at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm of fragment displacement were compared between groups using a 1-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05)., Results: Increasing epiphyseal displacements were associated with incremental increases in loading. There were no significant differences between fully threaded or partially threaded screws for loads at each displacement. Each stepwise increase in displacement was associated with approximately 325 N of force., Conclusion: There was no biomechanical benefit when using a fully threaded screw for stabilization of an in vitro SCFE model., Clinical Relevance: Although there were no differences between screw types in an in vitro model, bone healing around the fully threaded screw may eventually provide greater stability. The use of fully threaded screw remains a reasonable option in the treatment of SCFE, and implant removal may be easier with such a system. Further studies are warranted to verify these 2 points.

Background: Cigarette smoking is the most preventable risk factor for many negative health consequences, such as cancer, heart disease, and lung disease. In the United States, the prevalence rate in Asian immigrants is high (26%-70%), with Southeast Asian men having the highest rate. Acculturation has been associated with smoking behavior in this ethnic group., Objective: The purposes of this meta-analysis are to describe the extent to which acculturation affects smoking behavior in Asian immigrants and to compare the direction and magnitude of the effect between subgroups by gender and age., Methods: Databases within PubMed, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched. Twenty-one studies published in English or Korean from 1994 through 2005 met criteria, and 9 of these studies contained sufficient data. Among the 9 studies, 3 presented gender-specific data; thus, these studies were entered separately for men and women, making a total of 12 entries for final analysis. The odds ratio was used as an effect size statistic. The values of odds ratios were calculated from the data in the studies., Results: The average effect size for men was 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.99), indicating that acculturated men are 53% less likely to smoke than nonacculturated or "traditional" men. The average effect size for women was 5.26 (2.75-10.05), suggesting that acculturated women are 5 times more likely to smoke than traditional women. In adolescents, the average effect size was 1.92 (1.22-3.01), indicating that acculturated adolescents are almost 2 times more likely to smoke than traditional adolescents., Conclusions: Acculturation may have a protective effect on smoking behavior in Asian men and a harmful effect in Asian women and adolescents. The magnitude of effect is larger in women and adolescents than in men. Smoking cessation programs should target acculturated women, adolescents, and traditional men.

Background: Retrograde stabilization of mid-diaphysis adolescent femur fractures has shown excellent biomechanical stability. However, it is unclear whether adequate stability is maintained for distal femur fractures using the retrograde approach compared with the clinically recommended antegrade approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of retrograde and antegrade nailing for mid-diaphyseal and distal diaphysis femoral fractures., Methods: Twenty adolescent-sized synthetic femurs were randomly assigned to fracture location and surgical approach groups. Comminuted fractures were simulated at the mid-diaphysial level and 4 cm proximal to the distal physis. The retrograde approach used 2 c-shaped 3.5-mm titanium nails. The antegrade used c and s 3.5-mm nail configurations. Both techniques achieved maximum nail divergence at the level of the fracture. Biomechanical testing was conducted to determine differences in torsional range of motion (degrees)and failure load (N) at 5 mm. These data were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance (p < 0.05)., Results: In torsion, there were no differences related to surgical approach or fracture level. For axial compression to 5 mm, the antegrade approach required significantly greater force to achieve 5 mm of compression compared with the retrograde approach. The mid-diaphyseal fracture required significantly greater force to achieve 5 mm of compression compared with the distal diaphysis group., Conclusions: For maximum stabilization of a distal femur fracture, c- and s-shaped nails placed in the antegrade position is suggested., Clinical Relevance: Surgical decision making regarding the use of either the antegrade or retrograde approach will be influenced by both the stability provided (antegrade) and the ease of insertion (retrograde).

The anatomic and histological characteristics of the ligamentum teres and its vascular contributions to the femoral head have been well described. The function of the ligamentum teres remains poorly understood. Although excision is the current standard in treating complete developmental hip dysplasia, we developed an interest in maintaining, shortening, and reattaching the ligament to assure early postoperative stability in developmental hip dysplasia. To analyze its potential for providing hip joint stability, we investigated the biomechanical properties of the ligamentum teres in an in vitro porcine model. Six immature porcine hips were dissected, with the proximal femur and acetabular anatomy kept intact, isolating the ligamentum teres. Specimens were loaded in tension using custom fixation rigs at 0.5 mm/s in line with the fibers. Data for displacement and force were collected and sampled at 10 Hz for duration of each test. The ligamentum teres failed in a stepwise fashion. The mean ultimate load to failure was 882 +/- 168 N. Mean stiffness and failure stress were calculated as 86 +/- 25 N/mm and 10 +/- 2 MPa, respectively. The biomechanical function of the ligamentum teres is not inconsequential. We found the ultimate load of the ligamentum teres in the porcine model to be similar to those reported for the human anterior cruciate ligament. The strength of the ligamentum teres may confirm its potential for providing early stability in childhood hip reconstructions. In the setting of dysplasia, the preservation and the transfer of the ligamentum teres to augment stability should be considered as an adjunct to open reduction.

The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of triple innominate osteotomies fixed with either bioabsorbable or stainless steel screws. Triple innominate osteotomies were performed on composite hemipelves and fixed with either three 4.5-mm bioabsorbable screws or three stainless steel 4.5-mm screws. Two screws were placed from the iliac wing into the acetabular fragment, and 1 screw was placed from below the acetabular fragment into the iliac wing. Eight specimens for each screw type were biomechanically tested in an anatomical position (replicating weight bearing) and in a flexed and abducted position (replicating spica cast positioning). Specimens were cyclically loaded between 10 and 450 N to simulate the hip contact force in this population. Lower screws were then removed, and specimens were tested under identical conditions. Fragment displacement (mm) and construct stiffness (N/mm) were compared with a 2-way analysis of variance (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between materials for fragment displacement or construct stiffness. Anatomical position showed significantly less displacement than spica position for both materials. Initial displacement in the spica position was significantly less during lower loads for stainless steel fixation. Bioabsorbable screws demonstrate comparable biomechanical stability to stainless steel screws in anatomical and spica positions at physiological loads. Flexion and abduction of the femur adversely affect the stability of the construct for both materials. Bioabsorbable screws behave similarly to steel screws when stabilizing triple innominate osteotomies and would have the advantage of not requiring a second surgery for screw removal. Confirmation of biocompatibility should be completed before widespread clinical application.

Posterior spinal fusions are indicated for a variety of spinal disorders. Transfacet fixation minimizes soft tissue disruption and preserves the adjacent facet joint. This technique is uncommon due to concerns with biomechanical stability and proper implant placement. For these reasons, a length adjustable implant may obviate the clinical concerns but necessitates biomechanical study. This study evaluated the in vitro biomechanical stability between a novel transfacet fixation device compared with standard pedicle screws during cyclic physiologic loading in a human cadaveric model. Cadaveric L4-L5 lumbar motion segments from 16 human spines were tested in cyclic flexion/extension, lateral bending, and torsion after insertion of either transfacet fixation devices or 5.5 mm pedicle screw instrumentation. A load cell was used to measure the compressive forces on the anterior column during testing. Motion segment stiffness and anterior column compression were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance (P<0.05). The transfacet device demonstrated a statistically similar stiffness when compared with the pedicle screw system for each test direction. For anterior column loading during physiologic testing, there were no biomechanical differences between stabilization systems. Percutaneous transfacet fixation is an attractive surgical option for single-level spinal fusions. A biomechanical evaluation of a novel device for this application demonstrated similar stability to a pedicle screw system. The length adjustability of the device may alleviate concerns for precise device placement and the biomechanical stability may produce similar rates and quality of posterior spinal fusions.

Purpose: To biomechanically evaluate single screw and varying 2 screw fixations for an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) model using physiologically relevant loading., Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study., Methods: Twenty-four immature porcine proximal femurs were prepared to simulate a mild-to-moderate unstable SCFE. The femurs were randomized into 4 fixation groups: single screw, 2 screws horizontally placed, 2 screws vertically placed, and 2 oblique screws. Biomechanical testing determined maximum load to failure (N), load (N) at 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm of femoral head displacement, and stiffness (newtons per millimeter) for each group., Results: No significant differences were found among the 3 different 2 screw configurations. The 2 screw constructs were 66% stiffer and 66% stronger than the single screw construct. In addition, whereas there was no difference at 2 mm of femoral head displacement, each subsequent displacement (4, 6, and 8 mm) demonstrated significantly higher failure loads when 2 screws were used for stabilization., Conclusions: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis stabilization with 2 screws leads to increased stability over single screw fixation; however, none of the 3 configurations/placement patterns of the 2 screw constructs seemed to be superior in fixation stability., Clinical Relevance: These data support the use of a 2 screw construct in acute/unstable SCFE fixation. The biomechanical benefit of 2 screws needs to be considered in the face of greater potential for inadvertent penetration into the joint with an increased number of screws.

Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation of 1 and 2-screw anterior scoliosis constructs with varying screw diameters., Objective: To determine a possible optimal configuration of screw number and diameter at varying levels within the thoracic spine for anterior vertebral body fixation., Summary of Background Data: Single-rod systems are typical in anterior thoracic and thoracolumbar correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; although dual rod systems may offer more flexural stability. Loss of fixation remains problematic, particularly in the proximal thoracic vertebrae, and it remains unclear how screw diameter or the number of screws within the vertebrae affect fixation., Methods: Individual vertebral levels from 10 cadaveric thoracic spines were randomly assigned to either 1 or 2 screws of 5, 6, or 7-mm diameter. Bone-screw interface failures were created in coronal plane cantilever plow, and failure loads were compared across vertebral levels for each instrumentation method., Results: Two-screw constructs had significantly higher failure loads than single-screw constructs, while increasing screw diameter also produced significant changes in fixation strength. Two-screws had improved performance in the mid and lower thoracic spine, while a single screw was more stable in the upper thoracic spine., Conclusions: Failure modes for 1-screw constructs almost entirely (89%) showed gradual plowing through the bone, whereas acute fracture through the vertebral body or pedicles were common forms of failure (85%) for 2-screw constructs.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare psychophysiological and cortisol reactions to psychological stress in older depressed and nondepressed patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD)., Methods: Forty-eight depressed participants and 20 controls with elevated cardiovascular risk factors underwent a psychological stress test during which cardiovascular variables were measured. Salivary cortisol was collected after each test segment. Traditional (e.g., lipids) and atypical (e.g., C-reactive protein) CVD risk factors were also obtained., Results: At baseline, the groups did not differ on lipid levels, flow-mediated vasodilation, body mass index, or asymmetric dimethylarginine. However, the depressed patients had significantly higher C-reactive protein levels. Contrary to our hypothesis, there were no differences in baseline cortisol levels or diurnal cortisol slopes, but depressed patients showed significantly lower cortisol levels during the stress test (p = .03) and less cortisol response to stress. Compared with nondepressed subjects, depressed subjects also showed lower levels of respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA(TF)) during the stress test (p = .02)., Conclusions: In this sample, older depressed subjects with elevated risk for CVD exhibited a hypocortisol response to acute stress. This impaired cortisol response might contribute to chronic inflammation (as reflected in the elevated C-reactive proteins in depressed patients) and in other ways increase CVD risk. The reduced RSA(TF) activity may also increase CVD risk in depressed patients through impaired autonomic nervous system response to cardiophysiological demands.

Purpose: To evaluate single screw fixation stability, in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis, as a function of screw thread distribution across the physis., Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study., Methods: Thirty porcine proximal femurs were sectioned through the physeal line and stabilized with a cannulated 7.3-mm stainless steel AO screw. The distal 16 mm of each screw was threaded (5 threads). The femurs were randomized into 5 groups (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 threads across the physis) and biomechanically tested to determine failure load (N) and stiffness (N/mm)., Results: Femurs with 2 or 3 threads across the physis had a significantly greater load to failure and stiffness compared with femurs with 1, 4, or 5 threads across the physis (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Thread distribution across the physis seems to be important. When using screws with a 16-mm thread, greatest strength and stiffness are achieved when 40%-60% of threads engage the epiphysis, with a significant decrease when greater than 80% of threads cross the physis. Too few threads in the epiphysis as well as too few in the metaphysis both lead to decreased stability., Clinical Relevance: This study challenges the belief that compression across the physis maximizes slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation stability. We recommend equal distribution of threads across the physis when using 16-mm thread screws, and we postulate that screws with a greater thread length (32 mm or fully threaded) would increase fixation stability even further. Optimizing purchase may decrease the incidence of slip progression, especially as the prevalence of obesity increases in the adolescent population.

Study Design: In vitro biomechanical comparison of two methods of pedicle screw placement in cadaveric thoracic spine vertebrae., Objective: Compare the biomechanical integrity of extrapedicular and transpedicular screw fixation under axial and sagittal pullout loads., Summary of Background Data: Extrapedicular screw placement has been advocated as a safe and effective alternative to the transpedicular screw in thoracic vertebrae. Rigorous biomechanical comparison of these two techniques is presently lacking in the literature., Methods: Thirty-seven vertebral bodies were dissected from six cadaveric thoracic spines. Each body had two polyaxial 5.0-mm screws placed: one transpedicular and one extrapedicular. The 62 screws were randomly designated for one of two loading methods: axial or sagittal. Failure load (N), taken as maximum force on the load-deformation curve, and stiffness (N/mm), calculated between 50 N and 400 N, were measured. RESULTS.: Transpedicular screws were statistically stronger in both testing methods (P = 0.008). Load direction, whether axial or sagittal, had no bearing on pullout strength (P = 0.6)., Conclusions: These data indicate that transpedicular screws are biomechanically superior to extrapedicular screws. This difference is small, however, and we think that extrapedicular screws offer an excellent alternative when anatomy dictates their use with other screws in segmental spinal constructs.

Flexible intramedullary nail fixation provides excellent fixation in children with unstable tibial shaft fractures, but few published series demonstrate the results and complications with this technique in children. A retrospective review of 19 patients was performed, as well as a biomechanical analysis of two implant configurations. Outcome measures included union rates, residual deformity, and complications. Union occurred in all cases. Five patients (26%) had complications. None required repeat operation. Two (11%) angular deformities (>/=10 degrees) occurred with the medial C and S construct, versus none with the double C. The C and S construct was more stable to mechanical testing with axial and torsional loading. Flexible intramedullary nail fixation is a straightforward technique that reliably produces good results. While the C and S construct was superior in biomechanical testing, the double C construct is more reliable and straightforward and remains by far the authors' preferred technique.

Study Design: Biomechanical evaluation of sacropelvic fixation strategies as they apply to neuromuscular scoliosis., Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the rigidity of 2 methods of sacropelvic fixation (Galveston vs. Colorado II). The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect on construct rigidity by adding a pair of L1 pedicle screws to a Luque wire construct., Summary of Background Data: The Galveston modification to the Luque rodding system has become standard for treating childhood and adolescent neuromuscular scoliosis. The Galveston method provides reasonable lumbo-pelvic fixation with a relatively simple method of insertion. Clinical reviews of sagittal plane stability in neuromuscular patients with Galveston fixations performed at our institution have led to concerns regarding the technique's ability to maintain proper lumbar lordosis. This concern has generated interest in evaluating biomechanical stability of more rigid fixation methods in these long spino-pelvic constructs. As such, the following biomechanical study evaluated lumbosacral stability of 2 sacropelvic fixation methods: the standard Luque-Galveston method and the Colorado II sacropelvic fixation method using the Chopin plate-screw block. As a secondary interest, evaluations of the rigidity of the proximal construct when using pedicle screw fixation were completed. It was hypothesized that one additional point of rigid fixation at the thoracolumbar junction may make substantial improvement in rigidity to the otherwise Luque construct., Methods: Lumbo-pelvic segments of human cadaveric specimens were instrumented with L1 pedicle screws, sublaminar wires between L2 and L5, and sacropelvic fixation with either Galveston rods or Colorado II sacropelvic plates using S1 screws, S2 alar screws, and iliac screws. Tests were conducted for physiologic flexion-extension and torsional loading. Construct stiffness between L1-S1 was determined for each specimen. Motion measurement data were collected between L1-L5 and L5-S1 using a noncontact marker system. Statistical analysis included a 2 -way analysis of variance (dependent variables: construct/locked screw) with the Tukey post hoc correction for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05)., Results: The flexion and extension bending stiffness of the construct was similar between the Galveston and Colorado II constructs. Both constructs were stiffer when the L1 screws were locked rigidly to the rod. Torsional stiffness followed similar trends with no significant difference between the systems, although more rigid in more cases when the L1 screws were locked to the rod. Regarding limiting L5-S1 motion during flexion and extension loading, the Colorado II construct did so to a higher degree. There was no difference in torsional motion between the 2 constructs. Locking the L1 pedicle screws reduced torsional motion but had no effect on flexion-extension motion at L5-S1., Conclusion: The 2 methods of sacropelvic fixation provided similar construct stiffness, although the Colorado II method had less L5-S1 motion on flexion-extension testing, and the Galveston construct tended (although not statistically) to be stiffer in torsional loading. The addition of a pair of L1 pedicle screws increased the construct stiffness for both constructs by approximately 50%.