Search

Purpose: We assessed outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) that switched from proactive (treat-and-extend) to reactive (pro re nata) treatment regimen after developing macular atrophy (MA) or submacular fibrosis (SMFi)., Methods: Data were collected from a retrospective analysis of a prospectively designed, multinational registry of "real-world" nAMD treatment outcomes. Eyes without MA or SMFi when starting treatment with a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor regimen that subsequently developed MA or SMFi were included., Results: Macular atrophy developed in 821 eyes and SMFi in 1,166 eyes. Seven percent of eyes that developed MA and 9% of those that developed SMFi were switched to reactive treatment. Vision was stable at 12 months for all eyes with MA and inactive SMFi. Active SMFi eyes that switched to reactive treatment had significant vision loss. No eyes that continued proactive treatment developed ≥15 letter loss, but 8% of all eyes that switched to a reactive regimen and 15% of active SMFi eyes did., Conclusion: Eyes that switch from proactive to reactive treatment after developing MA and inactive SMFi can have stable visual outcomes. Physicians should be aware of the risk of a significant loss of vision in eyes with active SMFi that switch to reactive treatment.

Purpose: Assess the relationship between subretinal fluid (SRFL), intraretinal fluid, and visual outcomes of neovascular age-related degeneration in routine clinical practice., Methods: Treatment-naive eyes enrolled in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry after January 2017 were identified. Lesion activity was graded at each visit as inactive, active not SRFL only (A-NSRFL only), or active SRFL only (A-SRFL only). Eyes were grouped based on initial activity as follows: 1) initially A-NSRFL only or 2) initially A-SRFL only, and their predominant activity status over 12 months was as follows: 1) mostly inactive, 2) mostly A-NSRFL only, or 3) mostly A-SRFL only., Results: Seven hundred and three eyes were eligible for analysis. Initially A-NSRFL only had a similar adjusted mean 12-month visual acuity change to initially A-SRFL eyes (5.7 vs. 6.9 letters; P = 0.165), but their final visual acuity was worse (62.5 vs. 67.5 letters at 12 months; P = 0.003). The adjusted mean 12-month visual acuity change between the predominant activity groups was significantly different (P = 0.005), with mostly inactive (7.6 letters) and mostly A-SRFL only (7.5 letters) eyes gaining more than mostly A-NSRFL only eyes (3.6 letters)., Conclusion: Eyes with SRFL only had similar outcomes at 1 year to eyes that were mostly inactive. Intraretinal fluid was associated with worse visual outcomes, highlighting the importance of distinguishing between intraretinal fluid and SRFL when managing neovascular age-related degeneration., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Opthalmic Communications Society, Inc.)