Search

Background and Purpose: The advent of intra-arterial neurothrombectomy (IAT) for acute ischemic stroke opens a potentially transformative opportunity to improve neuroprotection studies. Combining a putative neuroprotectant with recanalization could produce more powerful trials but could introduce heterogeneity and adverse event possibilities. We sought to demonstrate feasibility of IAT in neuroprotectant trials by defining IAT selection criteria for an ongoing neuroprotectant clinical trial., Methods: The study drug, 3K3A-APC, is a pleiotropic cytoprotectant and may reduce thrombolysis-associated hemorrhage. The NeuroNEXT trial NN104 (RHAPSODY) is designed to establish a maximally tolerated dose of 3K3A-APC. Each trial site provided their IAT selection criteria. An expert panel reviewed site criteria and published evidence. Finally, the trial leadership designed IAT selection criteria., Results: Derived selection criteria reflected consistency among the sites and comparability to published IAT trials. A protocol amendment allowing IAT (and relaxed age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and time limits) in the RHAPSODY trial was implemented on June 15, 2015. Recruitment before and after the amendment improved from 8 enrolled patients (601 screened, 1.3%) to 51 patients (821 screened, 6.2%; odds ratio [95% confidence limit] of 4.9 [2.3-10.4]; P<0.001). Gross recruitment was 0.11 patients per site month versus 0.43 patients per site per month, respectively, before and after the amendment., Conclusions: It is feasible to include IAT in a neuroprotectant trial for acute ischemic stroke. Criteria are presented for including such patients in a manner that is consistent with published evidence for IAT while still preserving the ability to test the role of the putative neuroprotectant., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02222714., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Objectives: Although the mortality of severe sepsis is easily quantified, the actual cause and timing of death from severe sepsis are less defined. We used the INDEPTH (International Integrated Database for the Evaluation of Severe Sepsis and Drotrecogin alfa activated) database to investigate the reported cause of death in patients with severe sepsis., Design: Retrospective database analysis., Patients: Data from 4459 patients with severe sepsis (drotrecogin alfa activated, n = 3228; placebo, n = 1231) included in five clinical trials conducted in tertiary care institutions in 28 countries., Measurements and Main Results: We examined the cause of death and the pattern of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores near the time of death. We also evaluated the time course of biomarker levels at this late stage. A total of 1201 (27.0%) patients died during the 28-day study period. The main causes of death were as follows: sepsis-associated multiple organ failure (43.1%), refractory septic shock (22.6%), and respiratory failure (13.0%). There were no significant differences in the distributions of cause of death between drotrecogin alfa activated and placebo patients, so that all patients were combined for analysis. The mean cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score increased from 2.4, 4 days before death, to 2.9, 1 day before death, and the mean respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score increased from 2.6, 4 days before death, to 2.9, 1 day before death. The increase in these individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores was more prominent in patients who died early (day 0-5). Protein C levels decreased and interleukin-6 levels increased in the days before death., Conclusion: Patients with severe sepsis typically die of multiple organ failure, refractory shock, or respiratory failure. Persistent, more than worsening, organ failure is the more common pattern before death.

Sepsis remains a challenge for intensive care physicians, as it keeps up with high mortality rate in spite of the high costs associated with its treatment. Several studies indicate that the infusion of Drotrecogin-alpha activated (DrotAA) reduce mortality in patients at high risk of death when administered early and secured the appropriate initial treatment of sepsis as recommended by Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Europe and United States of America differ regarding the criteria of high risk of death in sepsis, two or more organ dysfunctions and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 25 or more, respectively. In addition to varied definitions of high risk of death for inclusion of patients in sepsis studies, the possibility of bleeding related to drug use and intrinsic limitations related to study design led the Company to develop a new randomized, multinational, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the effectiveness of drug in patients with septic shock in adults.

Disorders of coagulation are common adverse drug events encountered in critically ill patients and present a serious concern for intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. Dosing strategies for medications used in the ICU are typically developed for use in noncritically ill patients and, therefore, do not account for the altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties encountered in the critically ill as well as the increased potential for drug-drug interactions, given the far greater number of medications ordered. This substantially increases the risk for coagulation-related adverse reactions, such as a bleeding or prothrombotic events. Although many medications used in the ICU have the potential to cause coagulation disorders, the exact incidence will vary based on the specific medication, dose, concomitant drug therapy, ICU setting, and patient-specific comorbidities. Clinicians must strongly consider these factors when evaluating the risk/benefit ratio for a particular therapy. This review surveys recent literature documenting the risk for adverse drug reactions specific to bleeding and/or clotting with commonly used medications in the ICU.

Background: Key clinical trials involving drotrecogin alfa (activated) (or recombinant human activated protein C) excluded patients with specific baseline bleeding precautions. However, not all such precautions are considered contraindications to treatment with recombinant human activated protein C in current product labeling., Objective: To compare outcomes of patients receiving recombinant human activated protein C with or without baseline bleeding precautions as defined by the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial., Design: Retrospective medical record review., Setting: Two tertiary care institutions: An academic medical center and an affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center., Patients: All patients receiving recombinant human activated protein C for treatment of sepsis., Interventions: Demographic information, characteristics associated with inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PROWESS trial, and 30-day postdischarge outcomes., Measurements and Main Results: Seventy-three patients received recombinant human activated protein C. Serious bleeding events occurred in 7 of 20 patients (35%) with any baseline bleeding precaution vs. only 2 of 53 patients (3.8%) without any bleeding precautions (p < 0.0001). More patients with a baseline bleeding precaution died compared with patients without any bleeding precautions (65% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.0015). Patients with a baseline bleeding precaution had a higher mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (27.5 vs. 22.7, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of a baseline bleeding precaution was the only independent variable associated with occurrence of serious bleeding events. The presence of a baseline bleeding precaution, increased Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and the presence of bloodstream infection were independent variables associated with mortality., Conclusions: Patients with severe sepsis who received recombinant human activated protein C with baseline bleeding precautions as defined by product labeling had significantly higher rates of both serious bleeding events and deaths compared with those without bleeding precautions. These data suggest that strict adherence to PROWESS trial exclusion criteria would further limit serious bleeding events associated with the use of recombinant human activated protein C.

Objective: To demonstrate that drotrecogin alfa (activated) has an acceptable safety profile 1 yr from randomization., Design: One-year follow-up of patients participating in a placebo-controlled clinical study of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis patients at low risk of death (the ADDRESS study)., Setting: The study was conducted at 516 hospitals in 34 countries., Patients: The study included 2,640 patients., Interventions: One-year follow-up was performed as an addendum to the placebo-controlled ADDRESS study. Treatment groups were compared using the chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier estimates., Measurements and Main Results: Survival status at 1 yr was obtained for 90% of patients enrolled in the study (n = 2,376). The difference in mortality rate between drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients was numerically smaller at 1 yr (34.2% and 34.0%, respectively, p = .94) than at 28 days (18.5% and 17.0%, respectively, p = .34). In the subgroups defined by organ dysfunction class (single or multiple) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (<25 or >or=25), the differences in mortality rate between treatment groups at 1 yr were consistent with those observed at 28 days; no significant differences in mortality rates between treatment groups were observed. No additional serious adverse events were reported during the period between hospital discharge and 1 yr., Conclusions: No increased risk of death or evidence of harm at 1 yr was associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration in patients with severe sepsis at lower risk of death.

Objective: To gather additional 28-day all-cause mortality data and safety information for pediatric patients with severe sepsis who received drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA)., Design and Setting: Single-arm, open-label, multicentered study conducted in 59 study sites in 15 countries., Patients: One-hundred eighty-eight children (term newborn to <18 yrs old) with severe sepsis were consecutively enrolled in the study., Intervention: Administration of DrotAA, 24 microg/kg/hr for 96 hrs., Main Outcome Measures: Four-day and 28-day all-cause mortality, safety information, and protein C levels., Results: : One-hundred eighty-seven patients completed the study. The 4-day mortality rate was 7.0%, and the 28-day mortality rate was 13.4%. At baseline, 57.6% of patients were severely deficient in protein C (a level < or = 40% of normal). There was a statistically significant association between increased 28-day mortality and decreased end-of-infusion protein C levels (p < .001), greater number of baseline organ dysfunctions (p < .001), and greater baseline ventilator use (p = .03). Bleeding was the most significant complication observed. Serious bleeding events (including anemia without a bleeding source) were experienced by 27.7% of patients (n = 52). Six of the serious bleeding events (3.2%) were considered related to administration of DrotAA. During infusion, serious bleeding events with an identified source of bleeding were experienced by 5.9% of patients (n = 11). Central nervous system bleeding was experienced by 2.7% (n = 5). Two of the intracranial hemorrhages were fatal and occurred postinfusion., Conclusions: Without a placebo control, no efficacy conclusions are possible. Subgroups at higher risk of death were identified, and the change in protein C level from baseline was predictive of survival. The most significant complication observed was bleeding. Risk factors for serious bleeding appear to be multiple organ failure, thrombocytopenia, and coagulopathy.

Objective: To provide further evidence for the efficacy and safety of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis., Design: Single-arm, open-label, trial of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis patients. Enrollment began in March 2001 and day-28 follow-up completed in January 2003., Setting: ENHANCE took place in 25 countries at 361 sites., Patients: Patients with known or suspected infection, three or four systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and one or more sepsis-induced organ dysfunctions. Of 2,434 adults entered, 2,378 received drotrecogin alfa (activated), and of these, 2,375 completed the protocol., Interventions: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) was infused at a dose of 24 mug/kg/hr for 96 hrs., Measurements and Main Results: The 28-day all-cause mortality approximated that observed in PROWESS (25.3% vs. 24.7%). Although patients in ENHANCE had increased serious bleeding rates compared with patients in the drotrecogin alfa (activated) arm of PROWESS (during infusion, 3.6% vs. 2.4%; postinfusion, 3.2% vs. 1.2%; 28-day, 6.5% vs. 3.5%), increased postinfusion bleeding suggested a higher background bleeding rate. Intracranial hemorrhage was more common in ENHANCE than PROWESS (during infusion, 0.6% vs. 0.2%; 28-day, 1.5% vs. 0.2%). The incidence of fatal intracranial hemorrhage was the same during infusion (0.2%) and higher at 28 days (0.5% vs. 0.2%). ENHANCE patients treated within 0-24 hrs from their first sepsis-induced organ dysfunction had lower observed mortality rate than those treated after 24 hrs (22.9% vs. 27.4%, p = .01)., Conclusions: ENHANCE provides supportive evidence for the favorable benefit/risk ratio observed in PROWESS and suggests that more effective use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) might be obtained by initiating therapy earlier.

Objective: To assess the effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy, a recombinant human activated protein C, across clinically relevant subpopulations in a randomized, phase 3, placebo-controlled study of patients with severe sepsis (recombinant human activated protein C worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis [PROWESS])., Design: Univariate and multivariable analysis of prospectively defined subgroups from the PROWESS study., Setting: A total of 164 medical centers in 11 countries., Patients: A total of 1,690 patients with severe sepsis., Measurements and Main Results: We report observed 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients for subgroups prospectively defined by demographic data, surgical status, type and site of infection, and clinical and biochemical measures of disease severity. We performed subgroup analyses to explore the consistency of the mortality benefit observed in the overall population and performed tests for both quantitative and qualitative interactions. To examine the magnitude of the treatment benefit with drotrecogin alfa (activated) across the underlying predicted risk of mortality spectrum, we used stepwise logistic regression on PROWESS placebo patients to generate a predicted risk of mortality model that simultaneously included many clinical and biochemical markers of mortality risk. Because drotrecogin alfa (activated) has anticoagulant properties, we also present analyses of bleeding and thrombotic events. Actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) compared with placebo for nearly all prospectively defined subgroups. Both univariate and multivariable regression analyses showed a consistent relative risk reduction in 28-day mortality rates for drotrecogin alfa (activated). Larger absolute risk reductions were found with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with a higher baseline predicted risk of mortality, and actual mortality rates were lower with drotrecogin alfa (activated) in all subgroups defined by disease severity measures where a > or = 20% placebo mortality was observed. Although discriminatory power was limited by few observed events, the increased absolute risk of experiencing a serious bleeding event with treatment did not seem to vary according to the baseline predicted risk of mortality., Conclusions: The administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) to patients with severe sepsis was associated with a significant survival benefit that tended to increase with higher baseline likelihood of death. Current data suggest that the increased risk of bleeding does not vary according to likelihood of death.

Background: Reocclusion of recanalized coronary arteries often limits the efficacy of coronary thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Activated protein C (APC) is an important regulatory enzyme in hemostasis. In view of the potential of human APC as an anticoagulant and profibrinolytic agent, the effect of APC on thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rTPA) was studied in a canine model of coronary artery thrombosis., Methods and Results: Continuous artery flow monitoring in the left anterior descending coronary artery of 30 anesthetized adult beagles was performed by a magnetic flowmeter. Localized thrombosis was produced in the left anterior descending coronary artery and administration of rTPA (alteplase, 0.45 mg/kg IV) was done for 30 minutes. The dogs were randomly assigned to receive one of the following intravenous adjunctive therapies: (1) control group (n = 10): human albumin at a rate of 0.83 mL/min; (2) APC group (n = 10): human plasma-derived APC (0.6 mg/kg) with human albumin as a vehicle at a rate of 0.83 mL/min; and (3) heparin group (n = 10): heparin (200 U/kg) with saline at a rate of 0.83 mL/min. Each adjunctive therapy was started simultaneously with rTPA and lasted for 60 minutes. Coronary recanalization occurred in all dogs of each adjunctive treatment group in 19.1 +/- 1.9 minutes (mean +/- SEM). In a 120-minute observation after the termination of rTPA, reocclusion developed in all the dogs in the control and heparin groups but in only 3 of the 10 dogs in the APC group (P < .002 versus control and heparin). Time from recanalization to reocclusion (minutes, mean +/- SEM) was prolonged in the APC group (103.2 +/- 14.2) as compared with the control (10.2 +/- 2.3, P < .001) and heparin (30.3 +/- 11.8, P < .002) groups. Activated partial thromboplastin time was prolonged similarly in each group after thrombolytic therapy. On the other hand, bleeding time was prolonged in only the heparin group after the treatment. Serious hemorrhagic side effects were not observed in all three groups., Conclusions: APC prevents coronary artery reocclusion after recanalization with rTPA in a canine model of coronary artery thrombosis. This finding suggests that APC may be useful as an adjunctive treatment to enhance the effects of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.