Search

Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess the possible role of a prognostic index based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a large cohort of patients with recent myocardial infarction., Methods: The study population included 1335 consecutive patients admitted for ST elevation myocardial infarction and discharged alive from 48 Italian hospitals participating in the multicentric IMPRESSIVE (Infarto Miocardico, Pressione arteriosa e frequenza cardiaca. Studio Italiano di Valutazione Epidemiologica) study. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed 3 weeks after discharge, with a clinical follow-up of 12 months. End-points included cardiac death and new admission for heart failure. A prognostic index was obtained from the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring variables according to the formula: (220-age)-mean 24 h heart rate (m24hHR)+mean 24 h diastolic blood pressure (m24hDBP)., Results: Among many potential predictors only left-ventricular ejection fraction, creatinine levels, Killip class and the prognostic index were independently associated with events during the follow-up. In particular, higher values of the prognostic index were associated with a lower incidence of events, with an odds ratio of 0.958 (95% confidence intervals 0.943-0.974) and a 4% reduction in risk for each point of the prognostic index. Overall incidence of cardiac events was 6-fold higher in patients within the lowest quartile of the prognostic index (< or =148) compared with the other three quartiles (12 vs. 2, 1.4 and 2% respectively in the other three quartiles; P<0.0001)., Conclusions: A simple prognostic index based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and age may be a useful tool in predicting cardiac death and heart failure in patients with recent myocardial infarction.

Objectives: We tested the accuracy of the UA-705 blood pressure semi-automatic monitor., Methods: Device evaluation was performed according to the modified British Hypertension Society protocol released in 1993. Eighty-five patients with characteristics outlined in the British Hypertension Society protocol were recruited among those attending our out-patient clinic. Sequential readings were taken for the main validation test. Outcome was classified according to the British Hypertension Society criteria, which are based on four zones of accuracy differing from the mercury standard by 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, or more., Results: The mean blood pressure difference (+ or -1 SD) between device and observers was 0.4 mmHg (SD 7.7) for systolic blood pressure and 0.3 mmHg (SD 8.2) for diastolic blood pressure. Overall, 96% (observer 1) and 95% (observer 2) of readings between device and observers differed by 15 mmHg or less for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The device achieved a grade A for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure., Conclusions: This study shows that the A&D UA-705 device satisfies the British Hypertension Society standard for accuracy by achieving a grade A for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

In a prospective study blood pressure was recorded for 20 years in 132 white patients with congenital blindness and in 138 white control schoolchildren. The subjects for both groups were consecutively enrolled without any selection parameters. During the study period a similar proportion of blind patients and controls reported identical consumption of tobacco (above the age of 14 years) and of oral contraceptives (above 21 years) among women. Mean 24-h urinary sodium excretion, collected randomly in both groups, did not differ between the blind patients and the controls. During the 20-year period systolic and diastolic blood pressure rose with age in the control group as expected and much less in blind patients; after 14-17 years the difference was statistically significant. The mean slope of the regression line (beta coefficient) for systolic blood pressure versus age was 1.143 in the blind patients and 1.794 in the controls (P less than 0.001), and for diastolic blood pressure 0.908 in the patients and 1.353 in the school children (P less than 0.001). The mean weight and body mass index increased more in the blind patients than in the controls (difference 5.9 and 2.8 kg, respectively). The results support the hypothesis that low visual and cognitive stress levels determine a lower level of cardiovascular reactivity with ageing.