Search

Objectives: To retrospectively compare radiation toxicity in patients treated with concurrent anastrozole and whole breast irradiation versus women treated sequentially with whole breast irradiation followed by hormonal suppression., Methods: The records of 249 consecutive estrogen or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative whole breast irradiation were reviewed. Of total, 57 patients (the concurrent anastrozole group) received concurrent anastrozole prior to and during radiotherapy. In 126 patients (the sequential group), adjuvant hormone suppression therapy (anastrozole, other aromatase inhibitors, or tamoxifen) was administered after the completion of breast irradiation. In 66, women either concurrent tamoxifen was given with radiation or the sequence of hormonal therapy was not known. These women were excluded from the analysis., Results: The frequency of acute grade 2 radiation dermatitis (24.6% in the concurrent anastrozole group vs. 20.6% in the sequential group; P = 0.55), grade 3 radiation dermatitis (8.8% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.77) and treatment interruptions due to skin reactions (14.0% vs. 11.2%; P = 0.69) did not differ between groups. The rates of clinically detectable breast fibrosis were not different (24.2% vs. 24.7%; P = 0.97). With a median follow-up of 28 months and 30.8 months, respectively, 1 local failure occurred in the concurrent anastrozole group and 5 in the sequential group., Conclusions: Anastrozole, administered concurrently with whole breast irradiation, did not increase acute or late morbidity when compared with sequential administration of radiation and hormonal suppression therapy.

Objective: To evaluate the cosmetic outcome of brachytherapy after lumpectomy in the management of carcinoma of the previously irradiated breast., Materials and Methods: Between January 1998 and April 2008, 26 patients with TIS or T1 breast carcinoma were offered interstitial or intracavitary brachytherapy after lumpectomy in a previously irradiated breast as an alternative to salvage mastectomy. Twenty-five of 26 patients had prior lumpectomy followed by standard postoperative external beam radiotherapy for early stage carcinoma of the breast [dose range 5000-6040 cGy]. One patient developed breast cancer after full mantle irradiation [4500 cGy to the mediastinum and axillae] for Hodgkin Lymphoma 27 years earlier. All tumors were excised with final margins of resection free of disease per National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project definition. After lumpectomy, tumor bed implantation was carried out utilizing a low dose rate interstitial technique in 22 patients, whereas 3 patients were treated with high dose rate brachytherapy using the MammoSite brachytherapy catheter and 1 patient was treated with high dose rate brachytherapy using the Contura catheter. The low dose rate treatment consisted of 4500 to 5000 cGy at 35 to 50 cGy per hour to the tumor bed plus a 1.0 cm margin, whereas the high dose rate treatment consisted of 3400 cGy in twice daily fractions of 340 cGy currently used in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39. Cosmesis was graded according to the B-39 cosmesis scale for de novo treatments: grade I as excellent, grade II as good, Grade III as fair, and Grade IV as poor., Results: Eighteen patients were scored as grade I, 6 as grade II, and 2 as grade III. No patient received a Grade IV score. All 4 balloon brachytherapy patients were scored as Grade I. Twenty-five of 26 patients remained free of local failure with a median follow-up of 38 months (range 6-75 months). The only patient to develop a second local recurrence was graded as grade I before salvage mastectomy. Two patients developed wound dehiscence after immediate postlumpectomy implantation. Two have succumbed to metastatic breast carcinoma at 17 and 24 months after salvage implant therapy. An additional patient has succumbed to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. All patients, regardless of cosmesis grade were satisfied with their decision for repeat conservation therapy. Factors affecting cosmesis were distance from the implant to the skin, the type of device used, and the amount of residual breast tissue after repeat lumpectomy., Conclusions: The cosmetic effect of brachytherapy after lumpectomy in the management of recurrent carcinoma of the previously irradiated breast is acceptable in highly selected patients. Intracavitary technique may provide superior cosmetic results for patients retreated with brachytherapy for salvage.