Search

Aims: Histological subtyping of periampullary carcinomas is considered as a criterion for prognosis and therapeutic implications of these tumours. We assessed the immunoexpression rates of HepPar-1, CDX2 and MUC2 antibodies in different subtypes of periampullary adenocarcinomas (PAC), intestinal and pancreatobiliary, in order to assess their impact on differential diagnosis of this group of cancers. The expression of antibodies was also measured in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head (DAPH)., Methods: Sixty-five patients with PAC and DAPH who underwent pancreatic Whipple resection constituted the study cohort. Of these, 46 (71%) had PAC, and 19 (29%) had DAPH. Among PACs, 20 (44%) were intestinal and 26 (56%) were pancreatobiliary type., Results: HepPar-1 immunoreactivity was detected in 18 (39%) of all PACs. The rate of HepPar-1 expression was significantly higher in intestinal type PAC (75%) than it was in pancreatobiliary type (12%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of HepPar-1 immunoexpression for diagnosing intestinal type PAC were 75% , 89%, and 83%, respectively. Similarly, the rates of both CDX2 and MUC2 expressions were significantly higher in intestinal type PAC (80%) than they were in pancreatobiliary type (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both CDX2 and MUC2 immunoexpressions for intestinal type PAC were 80%, 92%, and 87%, respectively., Conclusion: HepPar-1 antibody was found to be a highly sensitive and specific marker for distinguishing intestinal type from pancreatobiliary type among PACs. In addition to CDX2 and MUC2 antibodies, HepPar-1 immunoexpression seems to have a potential role in differential diagnosis of PACs.

Background: Anatomical variations in right liver lobe are common. However, clinical implications and surgical management of these variations in living donor liver transplantation have not been analyzed systematically., Methods: Surgical anatomy of vascular and biliary structures in 120 right lobe grafts were reevaluated by reviewing the results of preoperative (computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography) and intraoperative (cholangiography) imaging as well as surgical findings. The data were analyzed in relation to surgical management of anatomical variations., Results: The incidence of variants leading to multiple portal vein anastomoses was 7.5%. The incidence of dual right hepatic veins was 0.8%; 30% of the grafts had significant accessory hepatic veins (>5 mm) and 13.9% of these were multiple. All of them were successfully reconstructed with technical modifications including venoplasty and venous grafts, except for two cases with multiple intraparenchymal portal vein branches to the anterior segment. The incidence of dual hepatic arteries was 1.7%, but only one of them was reconstructed without negative sequelae. The incidence of variants potentially leading to multiple bile duct anastomoses was 35.0%, and eventually 39.2% of the grafts had multiple orifices. With a variety of techniques including ductoplasty, hepaticohepaticostomy, and biliary stent, total incidence of leakage and stenosis was 10.8% and 9.2%, respectively. Although ductoplasty, internal stent or no stenting, seemed to be associated with increased risk of complications, anatomical variants, multiple bile ducts, and duct-to-duct reconstruction did not bear a significant risk., Conclusions: Anatomical variations of vascular and biliary structures in right lobe grafts are common. However, most can be managed safely with technical modifications. Only cases with intraparenchymal origin of the anterior portal vein(s) may form a relative contraindication, especially when combined with similar biliary variants. Otherwise, intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy was enough for successful management. Detailed and precise assessment of vascular and biliary anatomy is vital for appropriate surgical management.