Search

Background: The comparative impact of everolimus (EVR)-based regimens versus standard of care (mycophenolic acid+standard calcineurin inhibitor [MPA+sCNI]) on cardiovascular outcomes in de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is poorly understood. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in KTRs receiving EVR+reduced CNI (rCNI) or MPA+sCNI from the TRANSplant eFficacy and safety Outcomes with an eveRolimus-based regiMen study was evaluated., Methods: The incidence of MACE was determined for all randomized patients receiving at least 1 dose of the study drug. Factors associated with MACEs were determined by logistic regression. Risk of MACE out to 3 y post-study was calculated using the Patient Outcome in Renal Transplantation equation., Results: MACE occurred in 81 of 1014 (8.0%; EVR+rCNI) versus 89 of 1012 (8.8%; MPA+sCNI) KTRs (risk ratio, 0.91 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-1.21]). The incidence of circulatory death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or angina was similar between the arms. Incidence of MACE was similar between EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI arms with a higher incidence in prespecified risk groups: older age, pretransplant diabetes (15.1% versus 15.9%), statin use (8.5% versus 10.8%), and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (Month 2 estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 versus >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; odds ratio, 2.23 [95% CI, 1.02-4.86]; P = 0.044), respectively. Predicted risk of MACE within 3 y of follow-up did not differ between the treatment arms., Conclusions: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were similar between de novo KTRs receiving EVR+rCNI and MPA+sCNI. EVR+rCNI is a viable alternative to the current standard of care in KTRs., Competing Interests: C.S. declares no personal conflicts; the hospital received patients' fees and research grants from Novartis. F.C. received consulting honoraria and travel grants from Novartis. J.H. is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. A.G. is an employee of Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. P.B. is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. S.C. received funding from Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, and CSL for research, travel, or speakers’ honoraria. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose of Review: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) frequently develop left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is associated with an exceptionally high risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. This review focuses on interventional studies that modify levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and examine effects on myocardial hypertrophy, cardiovascular events and mortality., Recent Findings: Quantitative evaluations of trials of calcimimetics found no effects on cardiovascular events and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality when compared with placebo. However, a recent randomized, controlled trial of etelcalcetide versus alfacalcidol showed that etelcalcetide effectively inhibited the progression of LVH in comparison to vitamin D in patients on haemodialysis after 1 year of treatment. Prior to that, oral calcimimetic treatment has already been shown to reduce left ventricular mass in patients on haemodialysis, whereas treatment with active vitamin D or mineralocorticoids was ineffective in patients with ESKD., Summary: Data from a recent trial of etelcalcetide on LVH suggest that FGF23 may be a possible therapeutic target for cardiac risk reduction in patients on haemodialysis. If these findings are confirmed by further research, it might be speculated that a treatment shift from active vitamin D towards FGF23-lowering therapy may occur in patients on haemodialysis., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

[Figure: see text].

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence. The strengths of recommendations are provided in the full report. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Purpose of Review: In this review, we summarize different allocation schemes around the world and identify ways to exchange organs between countries., Recent Findings: The primary goal of transplantation is prolongation of patient survival and an improved quality of life. Most allocation systems try to match the potential survival of the organ with the life expectancy of its recipient. Kidney transplantation enables cost reductions by the avoidance of dialysis for the healthcare system, which is sometimes the driving force for state interventions to enhance donor recruitmentThe major benefit from international exchange is the possibility to transplant highly sensitized patients or patients with rare HLA allele.In a broad international exchange system, there are three possibilities: exchange of surplus organs, exchange of organs to support patients with a potentially excessive waiting time because of HLA antibodies or rare alleles, and exchange of organs to make the best possible match between donor and recipient., Summary: It is possible to shape a hierarchical allocation scheme, which could be applicable in the majority of populations despite different geographical and socioeconomic conditions: allocation to recipients with special requirements (high-urgency, highly sensitized); identification of a within the region/country; in case no suitable recipient can be identified, offer countrywide or between countries; for every organ transferred to another country, there must be an obligation to give one back.

Background: Kidney transplantation confers substantial survival and quality of life benefits for many patients with end-stage kidney disease compared with dialysis, but complications and side effects of immunosuppression can impair participation in daily life activities. Life participation is a critically important patient-reported outcome for kidney transplant recipients but is infrequently and inconsistently measured in trials. We convened a consensus workshop on establishing an outcome measure for life participation for use in all trials in kidney transplantation., Methods: Twenty-five (43%) kidney transplant recipients/caregivers and 33 (57%) health professionals from 8 countries participated in 6 facilitated breakout group discussions. Transcripts were analyzed thematically., Results: Four themes were identified. Returning to normality conveyed the patients' goals to fulfill their roles (ie, in their family, work, and community) and reestablish a normal lifestyle after transplant. Recognizing the diverse meaning and activities of "life" explicitly acknowledged life participation as a subjective concept that could refer to different activities (eg, employment, recreation, family duties) for each individual patient. Capturing vulnerability and fluctuations posttransplant (eg, due to complications and side-effects) distinguished between experiences in the first year posttransplant and the long-term impact of transplantation. Having a scientifically rigorous, feasible, and meaningful measure was expected to enable consistent and frequent assessment of life participation in trials in kidney transplantation., Conclusions: A feasible and validated core outcome measure for life participation is needed so that this critically important patient-reported outcome can be consistently and meaningfully assessed in trials in kidney transplantation to inform decision making and care of recipients.

Background: Graft loss, a critically important outcome for transplant recipients, is variably defined and measured, and incompletely reported in trials. We convened a consensus workshop on establishing a core outcome measure for graft loss for all trials in kidney transplantation., Methods: Twenty-five kidney transplant recipients/caregivers and 33 health professionals from 8 countries participated. Transcripts were analyzed thematically., Results: Five themes were identified. "Graft loss as a continuum" conceptualizes graft loss as a process, but requiring an endpoint defined as a discrete event. In "defining an event with precision and accuracy," loss of graft function requiring chronic dialysis (minimum, 90 days) provided an objective and practical definition; retransplant would capture preemptive transplantation; relisting was readily measured but would overestimate graft loss; and allograft nephrectomy was redundant in being preceded by dialysis. However, the thresholds for renal replacement therapy varied. Conservative management was regarded as too ambiguous and complex to use routinely. "Distinguishing death-censored graft loss" would ensure clarity and meaningfulness in interpreting results. "Consistent reporting for decision making" by specifying time points and metrics (ie time to event) was suggested. "Ease of ascertainment and data collection" of the outcome from registries could support use of registry data to efficiently extend follow-up of trial participants., Conclusions: A practical and meaningful core outcome measure for graft loss may be defined as chronic dialysis or retransplant, and distinguished from loss due to death. Consistent reporting of graft loss using standardized metrics and time points may improve the contribution of trials to decision making in kidney transplantation.

Background: Inconsistencies in outcome reporting and frequent omission of patient-centered outcomes can diminish the value of trials in treatment decision making. We identified critically important outcome domains in kidney transplantation based on the shared priorities of patients/caregivers and health professionals., Methods: In a 3-round Delphi survey, patients/caregivers and health professionals rated the importance of outcome domains for trials in kidney transplantation on a 9-point Likert scale and provided comments. During rounds 2 and 3, participants rerated the outcomes after reviewing their own score, the distribution of the respondents' scores, and comments. We calculated the median, mean, and proportion rating 7 to 9 (critically important), and analyzed comments thematically., Results: One thousand eighteen participants (461 [45%] patients/caregivers and 557 [55%] health professionals) from 79 countries completed round 1, and 779 (77%) completed round 3. The top 8 outcomes that met the consensus criteria in round 3 (mean, ≥7.5; median, ≥8; proportion, >85%) in both groups were graft loss, graft function, chronic rejection, acute rejection, mortality, infection, cancer (excluding skin), and cardiovascular disease. Compared with health professionals, patients/caregivers gave higher priority to 6 outcomes (mean difference of 0.5 or more): skin cancer, surgical complications, cognition, blood pressure, depression, and ability to work. We identified 5 themes: capacity to control and inevitability, personal relevance, debilitating repercussions, gaining awareness of risks, and addressing knowledge gaps., Conclusions: Graft complications and severe comorbidities were critically important for both stakeholder groups. These stakeholder-prioritized outcomes will inform the core outcome set to improve the consistency and relevance of trials in kidney transplantation.

Background: Recently, diffuse peritubular capillaritis (ptc) has been suggested to independently predict chronic transplant injury and loss, and although the ptc score is a diagnostic criterion for antibody-mediated rejection, the utility of diffuse ptc is under debate., Methods: We evaluated the diagnostic value of ptc characteristics in this cross-sectional study including 85 biopsies of patients with donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Biopsies were reevaluated for the extent (diffuse vs focal), score and leukocytic composition in relation to DSA binding strength (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]&#95;max). Chronic allograft injury (transplant chronic glomerulopathy [cg] or chronic lesion score CLS]) were associated with ptc features., Results: Peritubular capillaritis was detected in 50% (76% mononuclear ptc). Peritubular capillaritis scores 1, 2, and 3 were present in 36%, 55%, and 9%, and focal or diffuse ptc in 36% or 64%. Diffuse ptc was associated with DSA MFI&#95;max (median: 4407 vs 2419 [focal ptc; P = 0.04] or 1946 [no ptc; P = 0.004]), cg (58% vs no ptc 24% [P = 0.02]), and higher CLS (mean: 6.81 vs 4.67 [focal ptc, P = 0.01] or 5.18 [no ptc, P = 0.001]), respectively. The association of ptc score of 2 or greater with cg was slightly better than with diffuse ptc. Diffuse ptc and ptc score of 2 or greater remained independently related to cg after adjusting for DSA&#95;MFI&#95;max, C4d, or previous rejection episodes, however lost their independent relation after adjusting for total microcirculation scores. Diffuse ptc was the only ptc characteristic independently related to CLS., Conclusions: Our results emphasize the clinical relevance of reporting diffuse ptc, which may relate to DSA binding strength and potentially to chronic graft injury.

Background: Circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detected on bead arrays may not inevitably indicate ongoing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Here, we investigated whether detection of complement-fixation, in parallel to IgG mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), allows for improved prediction of AMR., Methods: Our study included 86 DSA+ kidney transplant recipients subjected to protocol biopsy, who were identified upon cross-sectional antibody screening of 741 recipients with stable graft function at 6 months or longer after transplantation. IgG MFI was analyzed after elimination of prozone effect, and complement-fixation was determined using C1q, C4d, or C3d assays., Results: Among DSA+ study patients, 44 recipients (51%) had AMR, 24 of them showing C4d-positive rejection. Although DSA number or HLA class specificity were not different, patients with AMR or C4d + AMR showed significantly higher IgG, C1q, and C3d DSA MFI than nonrejecting or C4d-negative patients, respectively. Overall, the predictive value of DSA characteristics was moderate, whereby the highest accuracy was computed for peak IgG MFI (AMR, 0.73; C4d + AMR, 0.71). Combined analysis of antibody characteristics in multivariate models did not improve AMR prediction., Conclusions: We estimate a 50% prevalence of silent AMR in DSA+ long-term recipients and conclude that assessment of IgG MFI may add predictive accuracy, without an independent diagnostic advantage of detecting complement-fixation.

During the last 20 years, waiting lists for renal transplantation (RT) have grown significantly older. However, elderly patients (ie ≥65 years of age) are still more rarely referred or accepted to waiting lists and, if enlisted, have less chances of actually receiving a kidney allograft, than younger counterparts. In this review, we looked at evidence for the benefits and risks of RT in the elderly trying to answer the following questions: Should RT be advocated for elderly patients? What should be the criteria to accept elderly patients on the waiting list for RT? What strategies might be used to increase the rate of RT in waitlisted elderly candidates? For selected elderly patients, RT was shown to be superior to dialysis in terms of patient survival. Virtually all guidelines recommend that patients should not be deemed ineligible for RT based on age alone, although a short life expectancy generally might preclude RT. Concerning the assessment of comorbidities in the elderly, special attention should be paid to cardiac evaluation and screening for malignancy. Comorbidity scores and frailty assessment scales might help the decision making on eligibility. Psychosocial issues should also be evaluated. To overcome the scarcity of organ donors, elderly RT candidates should be encouraged to consider expanded criteria donors and living donors, as alternatives to deceased standard criteria donors. It has been demonstrated that expanded criteria donor RT in patients 60 years or older is associated with higher survival rates than remaining on dialysis, whereas living donor RT is superior to all other options.

Background: Increasing evidence accumulates on the central involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) in disease pathophysiology. We identified distinctly deregulated miRNAs in human renal allograft biopsies from patients undergoing acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and delayed graft function (DGF)., Methods: Sixty-five posttransplantation kidney biopsy samples covering 41 cases with acute rejection (15 vascular rejection, 15 interstitial rejection, and 11 ABMR), 14 DGF cases, and 10 protocol biopsies serving as controls were analyzed using the Affymetrix GeneChip miRNA Array. Differentially regulated miRNAs were identified by Student's t test and Bonferroni correction. Target genes for the set of miRNAs were retrieved from miRTarBase (experimentally verified targets) as well as by applying the target prediction routines DIANAmT, miRanda, and Targetscan., Results: Patients with acute cellular rejection, ABMR, and DGF discriminate from the control group (protocol biopsies) in unsupervised clustering of miRNA profiles, clearly identifying deregulated miRNAs in rejection and DGF. Angiogenesis, apoptosis, and transforming growth factor-β signaling were identified as relevant pathways in ischemic response following an integrative analysis of miRNA targets and mRNA expression profiles. Inflammation by chemokine and cytokine signaling, T-cell activation, and B-cell activation were identified as relevant in acute rejection accordingly., Conclusion: These data suggest that distinct miRNA signatures playing a role in specific biological pathways discriminate acute cellular and humoral rejection and DGF. This finding serves as valuable tool for a rational selection of diagnostic, prognostic, and potentially therapeutic molecular targets of posttransplantation events.

Introduction: The efficacy of tight glycemic control for the prevention of death and renal failure in the general diabetic population is well established. However, in diabetic renal-allograft recipients, the effect of different treatment strategies on outcomes is undetermined., Methods: We conducted a cohort study of 798 diabetic, renal-allograft recipients transplanted at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2004. We studied the influence of glucose parameters and diabetes treatment on mortality and graft loss. Marginal-structural models and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to control for confounding., Results: Maximal glucose levels but not HbA1c were independently associated with mortality. Being in the highest quartile of maximal glucose increased the adjusted risk of death by a factor of 2.2 (P value for trend 0.009). Furthermore, in patients receiving insulin, the risk of death was increased 1.7-fold (95% confidence interval 0.9-3.1) compared with diet and 2.0-fold (95% confidence interval 1.1-3.7) compared with oral medication. Maximal glucose, HbA1c, or diabetes treatment did not influence death-censored functional graft survival., Discussion: In conclusion, maximal glucose levels and insulin treatment were independently associated with higher rates of mortality in our cohort of diabetic, renal-allograft recipients. However, graft survival was unaffected.

Background: Mycophenolate mofetil has replaced azathioprine in many transplant centers, but data on hard outcomes such as graft and patient survival are lacking., Methods: We analyzed graft and patient survival of the 1219 first renal allograft recipients at the Medical University of Vienna who were treated with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil over the past decade. Cox's proportional hazards models were used to compute crude and confounder-adjusted hazard ratio estimates of azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil. Model building was performed by applying the purposeful selection algorithm, confounding by indication was addressed by propensity scores and marginal structural models., Results: Five years after transplantation, 12% of mycophenolate mofetil users experienced functional graft loss whereas 26% of the azathioprine users had lost their graft (P<0.001). The hazard ratio for functional graft loss was 2.15 (95% confidence interval 1.16-4.02, P=0.016) in azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil patients. Actual graft loss at five years had occurred in 25% of the mycophenolate mofetil patients and 49% of the azathioprine users (P<0.001); hazard ratio 2.04 (95% confidence interval 1.22-3.39, P=0.006). Patient survival was not different in any of the analyses., Conclusion: The data from our observational study suggest that mycophenolate mofetil use was associated with a lower risk of graft loss than azathioprine-based immunosuppression.

Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is a choreographed process leading to delayed graft function (DGF) and reduced long-term patency of the transplanted organ. Early identification of recipients of grafts at risk would allow modification of the posttransplant management, and thereby potentially improve short- and long-term outcomes. The recently emerged "omics" technologies together with bioinformatics workup have allowed the integration and analysis of IRI-associated molecular profiles in the context of DGF. Such a systems biological approach promises qualitative information about interdependencies of complex processes such as IRI regulation, rather than offering descriptive tables of differentially regulated features on a transcriptome, proteome, or metabolome level leaking the functional, biological framework. In deceased-donor kidney transplantation as the primary causative factor resulting in IRI and DGF, a distinct signature and choreography of molecular events in the graft before harvesting seems to be associated with subsequent DGF. A systems biological assessment of these molecular changes suggests that processes along inflammation are of pivotal importance for the early stage of IRI. The causal proof of this association has been tested by a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of steroid or placebo infusion into deceased donors before the organs were harvested. Thorough systems biological analysis revealed a panel of biomarkers with excellent discrimination. In summary, integrated analysis of omics data has brought forward biomarker candidates and candidate panels that promise early assessment of IRI. However, the clinical utility of these markers still needs to be established in prospective trials in independent patient populations.

Background: It is unclear whether the choice of maintenance immunosuppression modulates the negative effect of advanced donor age on outcome after renal transplantation., Methods: All 1829 patients who received their first transplant between 1990 and 2003 at the Vienna Medical Centre and had a functioning graft after 90 days were studied. At this time point, 1587 received calcineurin inhibitors (CNI+), 242 did not (CNI-). Actual and functional graft survival was analyzed in subgroups based on donor age (<36, 36-49, 50-64, and >64 years) and immunosuppressive therapy., Results: The median follow-up time was 7 years. In total, we observed 312 deaths and 275 graft losses. After adjusting for several variables considered as potential confounders, actual graft survival was better in CNI+ patients compared with CNI- patients only if donor age was less than 36 years (adjusted hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.38) or 36 to 49 years (0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.62). Similar results were obtained for functional graft survival. Patient survival was significantly better in CNI+ subjects irrespective of donor age (0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.57)., Discussion: Use of CNI 90 days after transplantation is associated with improved patient survival even after adjustment for confounders, but its beneficial association with actual and functional graft survival is lost or at least reduced if kidneys from donors older than 50 years are used.

Small late-conversion studies found an impressive glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increase 1 year after conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL). This effect could not be detected in the considerably larger CONVERT study, which found a lower rate of malignancies in the SRL group. In the spare the nephron trial patients converted to SRL exhibited a mean measured GFR of 68 mL/min at 1 year compared with 60 mL/min from CNI patients (P<0.05). Accordingly, the CONCEPT study which randomized patients to SRL conversion 3 months after transplantation reported a significant higher GFR in the SRL patients at 1 year. These trials showed that conversion of stable renal transplant recipients from CNI to SRL is safe.

Background: The efficacy and safety of converting maintenance renal transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to sirolimus (SRL) was evaluated., Methods: Eight hundred thirty renal allograft recipients, 6 to 120 months posttransplant and receiving cyclosporine or tacrolimus, were randomly assigned to continue CNI (n=275) or convert from CNI to SRL (n=555). Primary endpoints were calculated Nankivell glomerular filtration rate (GFR; stratified at baseline: 20-40 vs. >40 mL/min) and the cumulative rates of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), graft loss, or death at 12 months. Enrollment in the 20 to 40 mL/min stratum was halted prematurely because of a higher incidence of safety endpoints in the SRL conversion arm., Results: Intent-to-treat analyses at 12 and 24 months showed no significant treatment difference in GFR in the baseline GFR more than 40 mL/min stratum. On-therapy analysis of this cohort showed significantly higher GFR at 12 and 24 months after SRL conversion. Rates of BCAR, graft survival, and patient survival were similar between groups. Median urinary protein-to-creatinine ratios (UPr/Cr) were similar at baseline but increased significantly after SRL conversion. Malignancy rates were significantly lower at 12 and 24 months after SRL conversion. Post hoc analyses identified a subgroup with baseline GFR more than 40 mL/min and UPr/Cr less than or equal to 0.11, whose risk-benefit profile was more favorable after conversion than that for the overall SRL conversion cohort., Conclusions: At 2 years, SRL conversion among patients with baseline GFR more than 40 mL/min was associated with excellent patient and graft survival, no difference in BCAR, increased urinary protein excretion, and a lower incidence of malignancy compared with CNI continuation. Superior renal function was observed among patients who remained on SRL through 12 to 24 months, particularly in the subgroup of patients with baseline GFR more than 40 mL/min and UPr/Cr less than or equal to 0.11.

Background: Several studies investigated the association of histologic scores of donor kidney biopsies obtained before engraftment with posttransplant outcomes. Discrimination and goodness of fit of these scores, however, is low., Methods: Thus, we sought to identify and elucidate the performance of molecular rather than histologic markers for this purpose using whole genome gene expression microarray experiments., Results: We identified 80 unique differentially regulated genes in 82 samples, showing no histologic damage versus those with histologic damage, based on the Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) and acute tubular injury. Main biological categories enriched with up-regulated genes in damaged tissue were "immunity and defense," "cell communication," or "apoptosis." Interestingly, genes involved in cell structure, cell adhesion, and protein trafficking were specific for tubular atrophy. Histology (CADI score) explained only 14% of the variability of 1 year creatinine (adjusted R2 for panel-reactive antibodies, biopsy confirmed acute rejection, and sum of human leukocyte antigen mismatches) whereas a combination of three biomarkers without clinical covariables explained 28%. The three molecular markers are the NLR family, pyrin domain containing 2 (NLRP2), immunoglobulin J polypeptide, and the regulator of G-protein signaling 5., Conclusion: In summary, we identified biomarkers in transplant kidney biopsies, which are predictive for medium-term allograft function.

Background: Donor factors such as age profoundly influence long-term graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation, but the molecular signature of these aspects in the allograft remains unknown., Methods: We analyzed the genome-wide gene expression signature of donor kidney biopsies of different ages obtained before transplantation. Subsequent analysis compared expression profiles from allografts with excellent function versus impaired function at 1 yr after engraftment. Differential expression profiles were analyzed on the level of molecular function and biologic role, as well as by analysis of co-regulation through transcription factors, regulatory networks, and protein-protein interaction data utilizing extended bioinformatics., Results: The 15 subjects with excellent transplant function defined as calculated GFR>or=45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 yr exhibited a distinctly different gene expression profile than the matched 16 subjects with impaired function defined as calculated GFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Donor kidneys from recipients with impaired allograft function showed activation of genes mainly belonging to the functional classes of immunity, signal transduction, and oxidative stress response. Two-thirds of these genes exhibited at least one protein interacting partner, suggesting choreographed intracellular events differentiating the two recipient groups. However, donor age may have confounded some of the associations found between gene profiles and graft function., Conclusion: In summary, a distinctive gene expression profile in the donor kidney at transplantation together with donor age predicts medium term allograft function in recipients of cadaveric allografts.

Background: Postischemic acute renal transplant failure occurs in approximately one fourth of all dead donor transplantations. Uncertainty exists regarding the putative association between the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and kidney transplant graft survival in patients with delayed allograft function., Methods: We conducted an open cohort study of all 436 patients who experienced an acute renal transplant failure out of all 2,031 subjects who received their first kidney transplant at the Medical University of Vienna between 1990 and 2003. Actual and functional graft survival was compared between users and nonusers of ACEI/ARB using exposure propensity score models and time-dependent Cox regression models., Results: Ten-year actual graft survival averaged 44% in the ACEI/ARB group, but only 32% in patients without ACEI/ARB (P=0.002). The hazard ratio of actual graft failure was 0.58 (95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.80, P=0.002) for ACEI/ARB users compared with nonconsumers. Seventy-one percent of subjects with ACEI/ARB had a functional graft at 10 years versus 64% of ACEI/ARB nonusers (P=0.027). The hazard ratio of functional graft loss was 0.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.91, P=0.025)., Conclusions: Use of ACEI/ARB in patients experiencing delayed allograft function was associated with longer actual and functional transplant survival.

Background: It has become increasingly important to refine therapeutic strategies according to individual patient characteristics. We evaluated the long-term impact of renal function at the time of withdrawing cyclosporine (CsA) in renal allograft recipients receiving sirolimus (SRL), CsA, and steroids (ST)., Methods: At 3 months+/-2 weeks, 430 of 525 patients were eligible to be randomized to remain on triple-therapy (SRL-CsA-ST, n=215) or to have CsA withdrawn (SRL-ST, n=215). Patients were divided into quartiles according to their baseline (last value before randomization) calculated GFR: 45 to 56 ml/min (quartile 2, n=105), >56 to 67 ml/min (quartile 3, n=112), and >67 ml/min (quartile 4, n=107). All data were included (ITT analysis)., Results: At 4 years, calculated GFR for SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST was 22.1 vs. 37.7 ml/min (P=0.017), 38.6 vs. 56.6 ml/min (P<0.001), 50.7 vs. 66.8 ml/min (P=0.006), and 62.7 vs. 71.4 ml/min (P=0.436), for quartiles 1 to 4, respectively. Death-censored graft loss ranged from 21.2% vs. 7.7% (SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST, P=0.092) in quartile 1 to 5.5% vs. 1.9% (P=0.618) in quartile 4. The incidence of death and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection also decreased with increasing baseline GFR, but was not significantly different between treatments. Overall, more patients remained on therapy in the SRL-ST group (46.3% vs. 57.9%, P=0.020)., Conclusions: Early and complete withdrawal of CsA from a combination of SRL, CsA, and steroids was preferable to continuing on this regimen, regardless of baseline renal function. The benefit was most marked in patients with a baseline calculated GFR

In the presirolimus era, cyclosporine withdrawal in de novo renal transplant patients was associated with increased rates of rejections; thus, no improvement in long-term graft survival was achieved. However, those patients who did not reject exhibited longer graft survival than did those on cyclosporine. In recent years sirolimus has been introduced into clinical practice and, so far, 4 randomized cyclosporine withdrawal trials in de novo patients after renal transplantation have been published, together with 3 smaller studies directly comparing cyclosporine with sirolimus. The main finding in all these studies was better renal function after cyclosporine withdrawal. In the largest trial with the longest follow-up there was even a trend toward higher rates of graft survival at 3 years and fewer histopathological findings in protocol biopsies at that time. Whether this success in renal function and graft survival will project to prolonged patient survival remains to be determined. In summary, with the introduction of sirolimus as a potent immunosuppressive but nonnephrotoxic drug, a considerable improvement in graft and patient survival might be possible.

Background: About 30% of cadaveric renal allografts, but almost never living-donor kidneys, develop postischemic acute renal-transplant failure (ARF). We therefore quantified the expression of essential reperfusion regulators in different compartments of cadaveric and living-donor kidney biopsies., Methods: Specimens were obtained from donor kidneys at the end of the cold ischemia time before implantation and categorized into three groups according to donor source and early posttransplant function. Ten living-donor biopsies (LIV) were compared with nine cadaveric kidney biopsies (CAD) with primary posttransplant function (CAD-PF) and to nine with ARF (CAD-ARF). Laser capture microdissection was used to isolate glomeruli from tubulointerstitium. The gene expression of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, interleukin (IL)-1beta, endothelin (ET)-1, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was quantified in glomeruli and tubulointerstitium by real-time polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan)., Results: Tubulointerstitial areas of all CAD kidneys revealed significantly lower mRNA levels of all investigated genes compared with LIV. Tubulointerstitial ET-1, iNOS, and eNOS in CAD-ARF averaged only half of the expression in CAD-PF kidneys. ICAM-1 and IL-1beta mRNA concentrations were equal in CAD-PF and CAD-ARF. Glomerular expression of the investigated genes was equal in CAD and LIV kidneys with the exception of ICAM-1 and ET-1, which were two times higher in CAD-PF compared with LIV and CAD-ARF., Conclusion: These data suggest that CAD compared with LIV kidneys have an impaired expression of immune and vasoregulatory genes in the tubulointerstitium, which may represent reduced cellular vitality and capacity to adaptation. The observed further reduction of ET-1, iNOS, and eNOS expression in CAD-ARF might contribute to reperfusion injury and delayed allograft function.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate early cyclosporine (CsA) withdrawal from a sirolimus (SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen., Methods: Within 48 hr after transplantation, 525 primary (90%) or secondary (10%) renal allograft recipients with cadaveric (89%) or living (11%) donors received 2 mg of SRL (troughs >5 ng/mL; immunoassay), CsA, and ST. Those eligible (430) were randomly assigned (1:1) at 3 months +/- 2 weeks to remain on triple-drug therapy (SRL-CsA-ST group) or to have CsA withdrawn and SRL trough concentrations targeted to 20 to 30 ng/mL (SRL-ST group) until month 12, and 15 to 25 ng/mL thereafter., Results: At 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences in patient survival (94.0% vs. 95.3%), graft survival (91.2% vs. 93.5%), acute rejection after randomization (5.1% vs. 9.8%) or discontinuations (34% vs. 33%) for SRL-CsA-ST versus SRL-ST, respectively. Serum creatinine level was significantly better in patients who had CsA withdrawn (167 vs. 128 micromol/L, P<0.001), as was the slope of 1/creatinine. Similarly, systolic blood pressure was lower in patients who had CsA withdrawn (141 vs. 134 mm Hg, P<0.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly higher in the SRL-ST group, whereas total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were not significantly different. Hypertension, creatinine increase, abnormal kidney function, toxic nephropathy, edema, hyperuricemia, cataracts, Herpes zoster, and malignancy were reported significantly more often in patients continuing CsA. Thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia, abnormal liver function tests, abnormal wound healing, ileus, and pneumonia were reported significantly more frequently with SRL-ST., Conclusion: Data at 2 years confirm that early CsA withdrawal followed by an SRL-ST maintenance regimen results in long-term improvement in both renal function and blood pressure, without increased risk of graft loss or late acute rejection.

Background: This study compared 2-year health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) outcomes of sirolimus (SRL)-treated kidney transplant patients after elimination of cyclosporine A (CsA) to patients continuing on a combined CsA and SRL regimen., Methods: A randomized, open-label, clinical trial was performed in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Four hundred thirty kidney transplant patients were randomly assigned to sirolimus plus steroids (ST) (n=215) or SRL and CsA+ST (n=215) therapy after 3 months of combined SRL+CsA+ST treatment. HRQL was measured using the Kidney Transplant Questionnaire (KTQ) and the SF-36 Health Survey at month 3 (time of randomization) and months 12 and 24 after transplantation. Repeated-measures analysis of covariance was used to evaluate treatment differences in HRQL scores over the 2-year period., Results: HRQL scores were available for 361 (86%) eligible study patients. Statistically significant treatment-by-assessment time interactions, favoring SRL+ST, were found on KTQ Fatigue (P=0.0158) and Appearance scores (P=0.0007). No treatment differences were observed in KTQ Physical Symptom, Uncertainty-Fear, and Emotion scores. Statistically significant treatment-by-assessment time interactions were observed for SF-36 Vitality scores (P=0.0203) but not other SF-36 scores (P>0.05). For Vitality scores, the SRL+ST group remained stable (mean, 0.4-point change) from month 3 to month 24 compared with decreases in the SRL+CsA+ST group (mean, -6.5-point change)., Conclusions: SRL-based therapy with early elimination of CsA results in fewer appearance-related problems, less fatigue, and better vitality compared with continuous treatment with SRL, CsA, and ST.

Purpose of Review: Postischaemic acute renal allograft failure is among the main risk factors for reduced transplant survival. Although new immunosuppressive protocols have reduced the number of acute rejections, the incidence of acute renal failure remained unchanged. On the basis of histomorphology it is not possible to predict donor kidneys at risk of subsequent failure. Some factors are associated with failure, but even combinations of these risk factors can not precisely predict the development of acute renal failure. Studies have therefore evaluated the influence of demographic donor and recipient factors on acute renal failure. New biotechnology and data mining tools are currently being used to study and identify the molecular predictors of acute renal failure., Recent Findings: Recent studies showed that donor factors contributed to approximately 40% of the variability in early allograft function. Deductive approaches identified some isolated molecular targets, such as adhesion molecules, as risk factors. Explorative analysis of the entire human genome, however, identified several predictive clusters of genes, which can be functionally grouped into categories such as cell death, stress response, cell adhesion, transcription factors, inflammatory response or cell cycle-related genes. Based on this information, preventative strategies using antisense oligonucleotides or antibodies were adopted. Clinical studies identified the use of catecholamines in the organ donor as beneficial. All these efforts aim to reduce renal tubular damage., Summary: A detailed analysis of the molecular events and pathways of renal gene expression in the donor and after reperfusion, together with sophisticated data analysis tools, will provide new insights into the pathophysiology of acute renal failure.

Immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity is among the major contributors to chronic renal allograft failure, which is the primary cause of graft loss. Because of a lack of alternatives to the inherently nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors for maintenance immunosuppression, long-term survival rates for renal allografts have not increased in proportion to the rise in short-term graft survival. Clinical studies have shown that mammalian target of rapamycin-based immunosuppression in combination with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine is safe and efficacious. These data suggest that a target of rapamycin antagonist (sirolimus/everolimus) should be used initially in combination with calcineurin antagonists in order to prevent early acute rejection. After 3-6 months, a maintenance immunosuppressive regimen can then be individually tailored to each patient on the basis of their clinical and histological status. Those patients at high immunological risk should remain on full-dose triple therapy. All other patients should receive either a calcineurin inhibitor or corticosteroid-sparing regimen, with a maintenance dose of a target of rapamycin inhibitor. This regimen should result in less immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity and a reduction in the serious side effects of steroids, such as diabetes and osteoporosis. Whether the proposed individually designed immunosuppressive regimen, based on protocol biopsies and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, will result in prolonged graft and patient survival remains to be determined.

Background: It is unclear whether patients with heart failure and renal insufficiency should receive a simultaneous heart and kidney transplant or whether a single heart transplantation is sufficient to restore native renal function., Methods: We analyzed the renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration of the native and transplant kidneys in eight patients long term after simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation using a dynamic MAG3 radioisotope scan and serum creatinine determinations. All subjects had been hemodialysis dependent before transplantation. Seven patients suffered from an intrinsic renal disease that were diabetic nephropathy in three cases, small fibrotic kidneys of undetermined origin in two cases, one lupus nephritis, and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in one patient who had a previous heart transplant. In one patient renal insufficiency was considered to be solely due to renal hypoperfusion because no intrinsic renal disease could be detected., Results: All patients were on cyclosporine-based triple immunosuppression, transplanted for 4 to 10 years, exhibited cardiac ejection fractions of more than 50% and had normal serum creatinine values. Radioisotopic scan showed no function of the native kidneys in all seven patients with intrinsic renal disease but exhibited normal function of the native kidneys as well as the renal transplant in the patient without intrinsic kidney disease before transplantation., Conclusions: These data suggest that a simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation is necessary in patients with cardiomyopathy and renal insufficiency due to primary kidney disease, but not in those with hemodynamically mediated renal failure, even if an immunosuppressive regimen with calcineurin inhibitors is used.

Background: Renal allograft rejection is associated with the expression of adhesion molecules on vascular endothelial and tubular epithelial cells., Methods: To assess whether the number of cell adhesion molecules expressed in donor kidneys can predict early rejection or delayed graft function, kidney biopsies from 20 living and 53 cadaveric kidney donors were obtained before engraftment into the recipients and the expression of the cell adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule (E-selectin) were determined by immunohistochemistry., Results: All biopsies from living donors showed significantly lower expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 compared to biopsies from cadaveric donors. There was no difference in the expression of adhesion molecules on tubular cells between transplants with primary function compared to allografts with early rejection in living donated kidneys (ICAM-1: 2+/-8 vs. 3+/-8%; VCAM-1: 9+/-7 vs. 1+/-1%), as well as in cadaveric kidneys (ICAM-1: 38+/-29 vs. 39+/-38%; VCAM-1: 55+/-27 vs. 48+/-29%). The expression of ICAM-1 molecules on tubular cells was determined to be a predictor for the occurrence of delayed graft function in cadaveric kidneys (ICAM-1: 65+/-24* vs. 38+/-29% delayed graft versus primary graft function). No delayed graft function occurred in recipients of living donated kidneys., Conclusions: These data suggest that adhesion molecule expression in donor biopsies is not a predictor for early allograft rejection, but can be used as a marker for the development of postischemic acute renal allograft failure.

Infectious diseases in renal transplant recipients are a major issue both from the medical and from the economical point of view. The major risk factor is the immunosuppressive therapy. Infections observed during the first weeks after transplantation are not different from those observed in nonimmunosuppressed patients after surgery. Infections with opportunistic pathogens, however, emerge at the beginning of the second month and are mainly determined by the allograft function.