Search

Objectives: Evaluate how total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant design, femoral component size, and preoperative knee range of motion affect retrograde femoral nailing., Methods: Cadaveric specimens were prepared for TKA with a single radius (SR) or medial pivot (MP) design and tested with cruciate retaining (CR), cruciate substituting (CS), and posterior stabilizing (PS) 9-mm liners. Knee extension identified the minimum flexion required to pass an opening reamer without impinging on TKA components. The angle between the reamer path and the femoral shaft was calculated from lateral fluoroscopic images., Results: In SR TKA, the average flexion required was 70, 71, and 82 degrees for CR, CS, and PS, respectively. The required flexion in PS was significantly greater (P = 0.03). In MP TKA, the average flexion required was 74, 84, and 123 degrees for CR, CS, and PS, respectively. The required flexion was significantly greater in CS and PS designs (P < 0.0001). Femoral component size did not affect the minimum flexion required. The entry reamer resulted in 9.2 (SR) and 12.5 (MP) degrees of apex anterior deviation., Conclusions: When performing retrograde nailing through either of these TKA designs with a 12-mm opening reamer, at least 70 degrees of knee flexion is required to avoid damage to the polyethylene liner or femoral component. PS implants require significantly more flexion with both TKA designs. Femoral component size did not affect the flexion requirement. Approximately a 10-degree deviation exists between the reamer path and femoral shaft., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a hip disorder of adolescence, which has the potential for profound implications into adulthood. SCFE patients are at risk of early joint degeneration and subsequent need for arthroplasty. The rate at which arthroplasty is required is not precisely known, but is estimated to be approximately 45% by 50 years after a slip. The femoral neck and shaft displace anteriorly and rotate externally relative to the femoral epiphysis, which remains fixed in the acetabulum. Stabilization of the physis is the goal of acute management. Despite such efforts, accelerated joint degeneration may occur over time. This progression is due to avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, or following years of femoroacetabular impingement. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total hip resurfacing (THR) are options for end-stage hip arthritis due to SCFE. THR is technically more challenging, with very limited ability to address deformity-related issues of impingement, decreased hip offset, and trochanteric malposition. THR, as in any metal on metal arthroplasty, may be associated with local metal sensitivity or systemic metal toxicity. Given the limited utility and potential risks, THR is currently not recommended in the majority of cases. THA, although historically demonstrating poor long-term implant performance in the young patient, has become a more reliable option recently. The potential benefits of THA are considerable, even for the young patient with end-stage hip degeneration. Certain cemented and many cementless stem designs show good long-term survival, as do current cementless cups. Advances in bearing surfaces promise to minimize wear and extend implant longevity. Ceramic on ceramic, metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene, and ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene bearing couples offer promise.