Search

Background: Many animal models can be used to study the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Most of these models rely on a partial denervation of the limb of the animal by ligating a selected nerve. In this study, we performed nerve lesions on three peripheral nerves supplying the plantar side of the rat hindpaw by differentially transecting the saphenous, the tibial, and the sural nerves alone or in paired combinations., Methods: The development of neuropathic pain symptoms at three different anatomical areas (medial, central, and lateral) of the glabrous skin of the hindpaw was evaluated by sensory testing over a 12-wk period. Mechanical hyperalgesia (pinprick), cold allodynia (acetone), and abnormalities of hindpaw posture were continuously present in animals with tibial and tibial and saphenous nerve transection., Results: Transection of the tibial and sural nerves induced cold allodynia and moderate mechanical hyperalgesia. Transection of the sural, the saphenous, or both nerves simultaneously induced no signs of specific neuropathic pain behavior and no abnormalities in posture of the affected hindpaw were noted after adequate stimulation., Conclusions: The overlapping innervation of nerve distribution can complicate the interpretation of nerve ligation studies of peripheral neuropathies.

The clinically available NMDA-receptor antagonist drug, amantadine, has been shown to result in morphine sparing effects in humans after surgery. However, no data are available to describe the exact form of interaction. The present study aims to profile the possible effects of amantadine (0, 12.5, 25 or 50 mgkg(-1) i.p.) pre-treatment on morphine (0, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5 or 5 mgkg(-1) s.c.) induced antinociception in rats. The (automated) formalin test (5% formalin, 50 microl) was used to assess if amantadine enhances the antinociceptive activity of morphine. Possible motor impairment was assessed with a rotarod test. Morphine was measured in serum of amantadine or vehicle treated rats to search for possible pharmacokinetic interactions between amantadine and morphine. Isobolographic analysis provided evidence for a synergistic interaction between amantadine and morphine in the second phase of the formalin test. No evidence was found to indicate that amantadine induced motor impairment at the doses potentiating morphine during the second phase of the formalin test. There was no evidence for a pharmacokinetic interaction between amantadine and morphine. Since, the second phase of the formalin test is dependent on activation of the NMDA receptor system it is concluded that an antagonistic activity of amantadine at the NMDA receptor most likely contributes to the synergistic interaction observed between amantadine and morphine in rats.

Unlabelled: Application of four loose ligatures to the sciatic nerve of a rat (chronic constriction injury [CCI]) induces clear hypersensitivity to non-noxious stimulation and chemical irritants. However, in this study, an injection of formalin in the hind paw of a rat with CCI-induced mononeuropathy resulted in an ipsilateral decreased flinching and licking or biting behavior in both phases of the formalin testing. The effect was independent of the formalin concentration used. This altered behavior was accompanied with smaller plasma levels of adrenocorticotrope hormone and corticosterone compared with sham and non-operated animals. Formalin injection in the contralateral nonligated hind paw of CCI rats also reduced the licking or biting behavior as compared with sham-operated and non-operated control animals only in the second phase of the formalin test. Thus, CCI reduces the pain reactivity and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis activation to ipsilateral and contralateral formalin injection. Further research should investigate whether the decreased pain reactivity by CCI is situated at the peripheral, spinal, or supraspinal level or is result of changes in the stress reactivity and coping strategies., Implications: We evaluated the changes in the behavioral reactions and the hormonal effects of a noxious chemical stimulus, i.e., formalin injection in animals with previously induced chronic constriction injury to the sciatic nerve. The effect in animals injected at the ipsilateral and contralateral site, sham-operated and controls, were compared.

Implications: That IL-6 is an interesting target in the study of pain is underscored by its biomolecular properties, its localization after experimental pain, and its modulating effect on pain after administration.

Unlabelled: Inotropic glutamate receptors in the spinal cord (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid [NMDA], alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid [AMPA], and kainate receptors) seem to play a key role in acute pain transmission and the neuronal plasticity in chronic pain states. Vocalization responses produced by activation of these receptors on the pain pathways can be quantified semiautomatically and thus could be used as a research tool. We studied vocalization responses induced by intrathecal administration of various agonists acting at the glutamate receptors in normal rats and in the presence of peripheral inflammation and a chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain. The nonselective endogenous agonist, glutamate, and the NMDA receptor glycine site agonist D-serine did not produce vocalization, whereas selective agonists acting at AMPA, NMDA, and kainate receptors produced dose-related vocalization responses. The vocalization response evoked by the administration of AMPA was significantly increased in the neuropathic pain model. In conclusion, spinal administration of ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists produce short-lasting, dose-related vocalization responses that can be used as a basic research and screening tool for analgesic studies. However, peripheral inflammation or nerve injury did not substantially alter vocalization responses overall, possibly indicating that the vocalization test is not a good tool for studying the role of excitatory amino acids in these pathological pain conditions., Implications: Vocalization responses evoked by spinal administration of ionotropic glutamate receptor agonists can be used for experimental analgesic studies. However, pathological pain models did not substantially alter vocalization responses, possibly indicating that this test is not suitable for studying the role of spinal excitatory amino acids in central sensitization.

Several binding studies in rodent brain homogenates have revealed two distinct micro-opiate binding sites based on differences in binding affinity of several opiate peptides and opiate alkaloids. Naloxonazine (NLZ), which preferentially binds to the high affinity micro(1) sites, is often used to discriminate between pharmacological effects mediated by micro(1) and micro(2) binding sites. The present series of experiments were undertaken to compare the opioid antagonistic properties of naloxonazine and naloxone (NLX) (a non-selective micro(1)-antagonist) on intravenous (i.v.) and intrathecal (i.t.) sufentanil (SUF)-induced antinociception and respiratory depression. The opioid antagonists were given either intravenously at 5 min after SUF, or subcutaneously (s.c.) 24 h prior to the opioid. Intravenous NLX and NLZ reduced the i.v. and i. t. SUF-induced antinociception, hypercapnia and hypoxia when given directly after the opioid. There were no major differences in activity between both antagonists. Pretreatment with 30 mg/kg NLX did not reverse the i.v. or i.t. SUF-induced antinociception and respiratory depression. Subcutaneous pretreatment with doses up to 30 mg/kg NLX only partially antagonized the i.v. SUF-induced antinociception, while a complete reversal was present of the opioid-induced hypercapnia and hypoxia. With regard to i.t. SUF, doses up to 30 mg/kg NLZ were unable to reduce the antinociception. The respiratory depression was partially affected; with 30 mg/kg NLZ, the i.t. SUF-induced hypercapnia returned to baseline levels, whereas the SUF-induced hypoxia was only minimally affected. These results challenge the classical view of the selectivity of NLZ for the high affinity micro(1) binding sites. They further fail to conform an exclusive role for micro(2) receptor sites in the respiratory depression and spinal analgesia induced by a strong lipophilic opioid such as SUF in rats.

Background: Epidural administration of an aqueous suspension of n-butyl-p-aminobenzoate (BAB) to humans results in long-lasting sensory blockade without motor block. The dose-response of BAB administered epidurally and intrathecally as a solution was studied in rats to define the local anesthetic properties in an established animal model., Methods: The time course of changes in tail withdrawal latency and motor function were determined in rats after epidural or intrathecal administration of solutions of BAB or bupivacaine. The dose-response relation was determined and median effective dose values were calculated., Results: After epidural and intrathecal administration of BAB solutions, the onset and duration of the antinociceptive action were comparable to bupivacaine. Median effective dose values for tail-withdrawal latency of 6 s or more were significantly greater for BAB. After both routes of administration, BAB clearly affected motor function., Conclusions: When administered epidurally and intrathecally as a solution, BAB is a local anesthetic of relative low potency with onset and duration of action comparable to those of bupivacaine. These findings suggest that the long-lasting action obtained after applying BAB suspension results from the slow dissolution (continuous release) of the solid BAB deposited in the epidural space.

Background: Data on the analgesic properties of alpha 2 agonists and their interactions with opioids are conflicting. Experiments were conducted in rats to evaluate whether various available alpha 2 agonists can potentiate the analgesic properties of opioids and to determine the route of administration needed for optimal interaction., Methods: The tail-withdrawal reaction test was used as an analgesia assay. In separate experiments, the interactions between systemic (subcutaneous, intravenous, and intraperitoneal) and spinally (epidural and intrathecal) administered alpha 2 agonists and opioids were evaluated. The antagonism of medetomidine plus fentanyl with naloxone and/or idazoxan also was studied., Results: All alpha 2 agonists tested, when injected subcutaneously with fentanyl, potentiated the opioid-induced analgesia. In terms of a reduction of the amount of fentanyl needed to produce a deep surgical analgesia (tail-withdrawal reaction latency > or = 10 s) over more than 2 h, the relative order of potency of the alpha 2 agonists tested was: medetomidine > dexmedetomidine > xylazine > clonidine > detomidine. For some of these alpha 2 agonists there was a biphasic effect: at the larger doses tested, a reduction in the fentanyl potentiation was present. The potentiation of the opioid activity with alpha 2 agonists was also demonstrated in terms of a longer duration of analgesia after combined treatment with fixed doses of opioids. The interaction between the alpha 2 agonists and the opioids remained present when a more profound criterion of analgesia (tail-withdrawal reaction latency > or = 30 s) was used. Furthermore, the interactions between the alpha 2 agonists tested and fentanyl or sufentanil appeared to be independent of the route of administration. Potentiations were observed after simultaneous subcutaneous injections of both groups of compounds, after the combination of intraperitoneal (alpha 2 agonist) plus subcutaneous (opioid), intravenous (alpha 2 agonist) plus epidural (opioid) and simultaneous epidural or intrathecal administrations. With regard to antagonism of the analgesic activity of combined treatment with alpha 2 agonists plus opioids, naloxone provided total antagonism, whereas the alpha 2 antagonist idazoxan overcame only the alpha 2 agonist-induced potentiation of fentanyl., Conclusions: The tested alpha 2 agonists can potentiate the analgesic properties of opioids, but they have no intrinsic antinociceptive effects on spinal reflexes on their own. The potentiating activities of the alpha 2 agonists could be measured both in terms of a reduction of the amount of opioid needed to reach a particular level of analgesia and in terms of a longer duration of analgesia with a fixed dose of the opioid. The potentiations were observed with various alpha 2 agonists and opioids and appeared independent of the routes of administration.