Mohammaden MH, Souza Viana L, Abdelhamid H, Olive-Gadea M, Rodrigo-Gisbert M, Requena M, Martins PN, Matsoukas S, Schuldt BR, Fifi JT, Farooqui M, Vivanco-Suarez J, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Klein P, Abdalkader M, Vigilante N, Siegler JE, Moreira Ferreira F, Peng S, Alaraj A, Haussen DC, Nguyen TN, and Nogueira RG
Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is part of the usual care for proximal vessel occlusion strokes. However, the safety and effectiveness of EVT for distal medium vessel occlusions remain unclear. We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of EVT to medical management (MM) for isolated distal medium vessel occlusions., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from seven comprehensive stroke centers. Patients were included if they had isolated distal medium vessel occlusion strokes due to middle cerebral artery M3/M4, anterior cerebral artery A2/A3, or posterior cerebral artery P1/P2 segments. Patients treated with EVT or MM were compared with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was the shift in the degree of disability as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day good (mRS score, 0-2) and excellent (mRS score, 0-1) outcomes. Safety measures included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality., Results: A total of 321 patients were included in the analysis (EVT, 179; MM, 142; 40.8% treated with intravenous thrombolysis). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting model, there were no significant differences between EVT and MM in terms of the overall degree of disability (mRS ordinal shift; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.25 [95% CI, 0.95-1.64]; P =0.110), rates of good (mRS score, 0-2; aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.97-1.80]; P =0.075) and excellent (aOR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.94-1.85]; P =0.098) outcomes, or mortality (aOR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.78-1.85]; P =0.395) at 90 days. The multivariable regression model showed similar findings. Moreover, there was no difference between EVT and MM in rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the multivariable regression model (aOR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.21-1.58]; P =0.277), but the inverse probability of treatment weighting model showed a lower likelihood of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.85]; P =0.013) in the EVT group., Conclusions: This multicenter study failed to demonstrate any significant outcome differences among patients with isolated distal medium vessel occlusions treated with EVT versus MM. These findings reinforce clinical equipoise. Randomized clinical trials are ongoing and will provide more definite evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Nogueira reports compensations from Anaconda Biomed for consultant services; from Corindus, Inc‚ for consultant services; from Genentech for consultant services; from Vesalio for consultant services; from Imperative Care for consultant services; from Biogen, Inc‚ for consultant services; from Cerenovus for consultant services; from RapidPulse for consultant services; from Medtronic USA, Inc‚ for consultant services; from Prolong Pharmaceuticals for consultant services; from Perfuze for consultant services; from Ceretrieve for consultant services; from Phenox for consultant services; from Brainomix for consultant services; from Stryker Corporation for consultant services; from NeuroVasc Technologies, Inc‚ for consultant services; and from Viz-AI for consultant services; and reports stock options in Brainomix, Ceretrieve, Viz-AI, Vesalio, Corindus, Inc, and Perfuze. Dr Haussen reports stock options in Viz-AI; compensations from Cerenovus, Stryker, Vesalio Brainomix, Chiesi USA Inc, and Poseydon Medical for consultant services; and compensation from Jacobs institute for data and safety monitoring services. Dr Nguyen received research support from Brainomix, a relation with Idorsia. Dr Ortega-Gutierrez reports consulting fees for advisory roles with Stryker Neurovascular, Medtronic, and Microvention, and receives research support from Medtronic, Carver College of Medicine-University of Iowa, methinks, National Institutes of Health, and Siemens, Stryker, and Microvention. Dr Siegler reports compensations from Ceribell for consultant services and from AstraZeneca for other services. Dr Alaraj reports compensation from Johnson and Johnson for consultant services. Dr Fifi reports compensations from MIVI for data and safety monitoring services and from Stryker Corporation, MicroVention, Inc, Penumbra, Inc, Cerenovus, and Viz-AI for consultant services; and reports stock holdings in Imperative Care. The other authors report no conflicts.