Search

A key immunomodulatory cytokine, IL-10 (interleukin-10), has been shown to be dysregulated in preeclampsia, a pregnancy-specific hypertensive disorder, further characterized by multi-system involvement. However, studies have reported inconsistent findings about circulating IL-10 levels in preeclamptic versus normotensive pregnancies. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess circulating IL-10 levels in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies at 2 time points: before, and at the time of preeclampsia diagnosis. PubMED, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched to include all published studies examining circulating IL-10 levels in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. Differences in IL-10 levels were evaluated by standardized mean differences. Of 876 abstracts screened, 56 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Circulating IL-10 levels were not different before the time of active disease (standardized mean differences, -0.01 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.08]; P=0.76). At the time of active disease, women with preeclampsia (n=1599) had significantly lower IL-10 levels compared with normotensive controls (n=1998; standardized mean differences, -0.79 [95% CI, -1.22 to -0.35]; P=0.0004). IL-10 levels were lower in both early/severe and late/mild forms of preeclampsia. Subgroup analysis revealed that IL-10 measurement methodology (ELISA or multiplex bead array) and the sample type (plasma or serum) significantly influenced the observed differences, with the use of sera paired with ELISA technology providing the best distinction in IL-10 levels between preeclamptic and normotensive pregnancies. These findings support the role of decreased IL-10 levels in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Future studies should address the therapeutic potential of IL-10 in preeclampsia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite optimal current therapies, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause for death worldwide. Importantly, advances in peptide engineering have accelerated the development of innovative therapeutics for diverse human disease states. Additionally, the advancement of bispecific therapeutics targeting >1 signaling pathway represents a highly innovative strategy for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. We, therefore, engineered a novel, designer peptide, which simultaneously targets the pGC-A (particulate guanylyl cyclase A) receptor and the MasR (Mas receptor), potentially representing an attractive cardiorenoprotective therapeutic for cardiovascular disease. We engineered a novel, bispecific receptor activator, NPA7, that represents the fusion of a 22-amino acid sequence of BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide; an endogenous ligand of pGC-A) with Ang 1-7 (angiotensin 1-7)-the 7-amino acid endogenous activator of MasR. We assessed NPA7's dual receptor activating actions in vitro (second messenger production and receptor interaction). Further, we performed an intravenous peptide infusion comparison study in normal canines to study its biological actions in vivo, including in the presence of an MasR antagonist. Our in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate the successful synthesis of NPA7 as a bispecific receptor activator targeting pGC-A and MasR. In normal canines, NPA7 possesses enhanced natriuretic, diuretic, systemic, and renal vasorelaxing and cardiac unloading properties. Importantly, NPA7's actions are superior to that of the individual native pGC-A or MasR ligands. These studies advance NPA7 as a novel, bispecific designer peptide with potential cardiorenal therapeutic benefit for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, such as hypertension and heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the controversy regarding whether carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) may be superior for stroke prevention, it is uncertain how recent clinical evidence, guidelines, and reimbursement policies have influenced the volume and outcomes after these procedures.We conducted a serial, cross-sectional study with time trends of patients undergoing CAS (n=124 265) and CEA (n=1 260 647) between 2001 and 2010 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. During the 10-year period, the frequency of CEA declined, whereas CAS use slowly increased. After multivariate propensity score-matched analysis, CAS was associated with an increased risk of death (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.04), stroke (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.23-1.66), and major adverse events including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.13-1.39). In asymptomatic patients, there was no significant difference in major adverse events (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.20; P=0.16 [P <0.001 for interaction between procedure type and symptom status]) between CAS and CEA. Importantly, there was a significant improvement in CAS outcomes during the course of 10 years (reduction in death [OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.49-0.67; P for trend=0.03] and major adverse events [OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.84; P for trend=0.05] comparing years 2010 versus 2001).In US hospitals between 2001 and 2010, CAS was associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, partly attributable to selection and ascertainment bias. Asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS versus CEA had similar adjusted rates of major adverse events. CAS outcomes improved significantly during the course of the decade likely attributable to improvements in patient selection, operator skills, and technological advancements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]