Search

Background--The impact of disease severity on the outcome after complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is uncertain. The objective of this post hoc study was to evaluate the impact of number of diseased vessel, lesion location, and severity of the noninfarct-related stenosis on the effect of fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization. Methods and Results--In the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI study (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization), we randomized 627 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients to fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization or infarct-related percutaneous coronary intervention only. In patients with 3-vessel disease, fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization reduced the primary end point (all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization; hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.64; P=0.001), with no significant effect in patients with 2-vessel disease (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.47-1.26; P=0.29; P for interaction =0.046). A similar effect was observed in patients with diameter stenosis ≥90% of noninfarct-related arteries (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.62; P=0.001), but not in patients with less severe lesions (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.44-1.19; P=0.21; P for interaction =0.06). The effect was most pronounced in patients with 3-vessel disease and noninfarct-related stenoses ≥90%, and in this subgroup, there was a nonsignificant reduction in the end point of mortality and reinfarction (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.08-1.32; P=0.09). Proximal versus distal location did not influence the benefit from complete revascularization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--Pathological early Q waves (QW) are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may therefore be less beneficial in patients with QW than in patients without QW. Myocardial salvage index and microvascular obstruction (MVO) are markers for reperfusion success. Thus, to clarify the benefit from primary PCI in STEMI patients with QW, we examined the association between baseline QW and myocardial salvage index and MVO in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. Methods and Results--The ECG was assessed before primary PCI for the presence of QW (early) in 515 STEMI patients. The patients underwent a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scan at day 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-1) and again at day 92 (IQR, 89-96). Early QW was observed in 108 (21%) patients and was related to smaller final myocardial salvage index (0.59 [IQR, 0.39-0.69] versus 0.65 [IQR, 0.46-0.84]; P<0.001) and larger MVO (1.4 [IQR, 0.0-5.4] versus 0.0 [IQR, 0.0-2.4]; P<0.001) compared with non-QW. QW remained associated with both final myocardial salvage index (β=-0.12; P=0.03) and MVO (β=0.18; P=0.001) after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusions--Patients presenting with their first STEMI and early QW in the ECG had smaller myocardial salvage index and more extensive MVO than non-QW despite treatment within 12 hours after symptom onset. However, final myocardial salvage index in patients with QW was substantial, and patients with QW still benefit from primary PCI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which hypothesized that the effect of exenatide is more pronounced in patients with short system delay. Patients 18 years old and above and presented within 12 hours from the onset of symptoms and signs of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were eligible. It suggests an association between exenatide treatment with a 30% decrease in final infarct size in patients with short system delay.

The article evaluates the effect of ischemic postconditioning applied during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCCI) on the final infarct size using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). It is hypothesized that viable cardiomyocytes will benefit from postconditioning as long as they exist in the ischemic myocardium at the time of reperfusion. It is also suggested that myocardial damage during PCCI in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction is reduced by postconditioning.

Background: In patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, reperfusion injury accounts for a significant fraction of the final infarct size, which is directly related to patient prognosis. In animal studies, brief periods of ischemia in noninfarct-related (nonculprit) coronary arteries protect the culprit myocardium via remote ischemic preconditioning. Positive fractional flow reserve (FFR) documents functional significant coronary nonculprit stenosis, which may offer remote ischemic preconditioning of the culprit myocardium. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between functional significant, multivessel disease (MVD) and reduced culprit final infarct size or increased myocardial salvage (myocardial salvage index [MSI]) in a large contemporary cohort of STEMI patients. Methods: Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in 610 patients with STEMI at day 1 and 3 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to FFR measurements in nonculprit stenosis (if any): angiographic single vessel disease (SVD), FFR nonsignificant MVD (functional SVD), or FFR-significant, functional MVD. Results: A total of 431 (71%) patients had SVD, 35 (6%) had functional SVD, and 144 (23%) had functional MVD. There was no difference in final infarct size (mean infarct size [%left ventricular mass] SVD, 9±3%; functional SVD, 9±3%; and functional MVD, 9±3% [ P =0.82]) or in MSI between groups (mean MSI [%left] SVD, 66±23%; functional SVD, 68±19%; and functional MVD, 69±19% [ P =0.62]). In multivariable analyses, functional MVD was not associated with larger MSI (P =0.56) or smaller infarct size (P =0.55). Conclusions: Functional MVD in nonculprit myocardium was not associated with reduced culprit final infarct size or increased MSI following STEMI. This is important knowledge for future studies examining a cardioprotective treatment in patients with STEMI, as a possible confounding effect of FFR-significant, functional MVD can be discarded. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01435408 (DANAMI 3-iPOST and DANAMI 3-DEFER) and NCT01960933 (DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Guidelines recommend primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting ≥12 hours of symptom onset in the presence of ongoing ischemia. However, data supporting this recommendation are limited. We evaluated the effect of primary PCI on reperfusion success, using cardiac magnetic resonance, in STEMI patients with signs of ongoing ischemia presenting 12 to 72 hours after symptom onset compared with STEMI patients presenting <12 hours. Methods and Results: We included 865 STEMI patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance just after index PCI and 3 months later. Despite equal area at risk (34±12% versus 33±12%; P =0.370), patients presenting late (n=58) had larger final infarct size (13% [interquartile range, 9–24] versus 11% [interquartile range, 4–19]; P =0.037) and smaller myocardial salvage index (0.58 [interquartile range, 0.39–0.71] versus 0.65 [interquartile range, 0.49–0.84]; P =0.021) compared with patients presenting <12 hours after symptom onset (n=807). However, 65% of late-presenting patients achieved substantial myocardial salvage ≥0.50, and area under the curve for symptom onset to PCI as predictor of a myocardial salvage index ≥0.50 was poor (0.58 [95% CI, 0.53–0.63]; P <0.001). In addition, final infarct size, salvage index and left ventricular function correlated weakly with duration from symptom onset to primary PCI (R 2 values <0.05). Conclusions: STEMI patients with signs of ongoing ischemia treated with primary PCI 12 to 72 hours after symptom onset had less myocardial salvage and developed larger infarcts. However, a large proportion achieved substantial myocardial salvage indicating a benefit from primary PCI in late-presenting patients. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01435408 and NCT01960933. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis frequently have coexisting coronary artery disease. Invasive hyperemic and nonhyperemic pressure indices are used to assess coronary artery disease severity but have not been evaluated in the context of severe aortic stenosis., Methods: We compared lesion reclassification rates of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) measured before and 6 months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the conventional clinical cutoffs of ≤0.80 for FFR and ≤0.89 for RFR. This was a substudy of the ongoing NOTION-3 trial (Third Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention). Two-dimensional quantitative coronary analysis was used to assess changes in angiographic lesion severity., Results: Forty patients were included contributing 50 lesions in which FFR was measured. In 32 patients (36 lesions), RFR was also measured. There was no significant change in diameter stenosis from baseline to follow-up, 49.8% (42.9%-57.1%) versus 52.3% (43.2%-57.8%), P =0.50. RFR improved significantly from 0.88 (0.83%-0.93) at baseline to 0.92 (0.83-0.95) at follow-up, P =0.003, whereas FFR remained unchanged, 0.84 (0.81-0.89) versus 0.86 (0.78-0.90), P =0.72. At baseline, 11 out of 50 (22%) lesions were FFR-positive, whereas 15 out of 50 (30%) were positive at follow-up, P =0.219. Corresponding numbers for RFR were 23 out of 36 (64%) at baseline and 12 out of 36 (33%) at follow-up, P =0.003., Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis, physiological assessment of coronary lesions with FFR before transcatheter aortic valve implantation leads to lower reclassification rate at 6-month follow-up, compared with RFR.